Module 1 - Unit 5 (RA2 - Risk Analysis & Evaluation) Flashcards
(29 cards)
Define ‘risk analysis’ according to the IRM (2002)
- Risk analysis is used to provide a risk profile
- Gives a rating of significance to each risk
- Provides a tool for prioritising risk treatments
- Note: risk analysis helps us to determine the severity of the risks an organisation faces by analysing the likelihood of the risk materialising together with the severity of the impact on the organisation.
- It’s the ‘risk rating’ stage of ISO 31000
List four aims of risk analysis
- Prioritises risk for risk treatment
- Achieves a consistent perceptions of significance
- Inform decisions on allocation for scarce resources
- Inform decisions on the viability of strategies, investment and projects
- Facilitates review and monitoring of risk
- Allows all concerned to see the overall risk profile
- To be clear about the difference between residual risk and inherent risk
Define ‘target risk’
Target risk is the risk rating that is within the tolerance and appetite of the organisation (where you want to ‘control’ the risk to).
Define ‘probability’ in terms of likelihood.
Probability is expressed numerically as a value between 0 and 1 (or 0% to 100%).
Define ‘frequency’ in terms of likelihood.
Frequency is expressed numerically as chances of occurrence / a frequency measurement (1 in 100 years, or 1 in 10 chance)
Impact may be described as qualitative and quantitive, state the difference between the two.
Qualitative: high, medium, low (generates non-numerical data)
Quantitative: financial, market
share, number or customers, time, resources (can be measured and hold a numerical value).
State four types of information you can use as a source to determine your impact and likelihood.
- Past records
- Relevant personal experience
- Relevant industry experience
- Published literature
- Testing or experiments (e.g. market research)
- Economic or statistical forecasting
- Expert judgement
- Organisation and performance indicators.
Draw a ‘three by three’ risk matrix, showing appropriate labels and measures of severity
- Square split into 9
- Likelihood on the x-axis (low, medium, high)
- Impact on the y-axis (low, medium, high)
- Green, yellow, and red colours to show the RAG ratings associated to each square
- Likelihood x impact numbers in each square.
Explain one benefit for pre-defined criteria for analysing and quantifying Impact of a risk event.
This helps provide comparability and consistency otherwise the same risk event could place in different cells in a matrix by different people.
What does ALARP stand for?
As Low As Reasonably Practicable
ALARP is one of the fundamental principles of risk management for health and safety.
Describe how you would determine that the risk has been reduced “as low as reasonably practicable.”
- This would be the point at which the costs of any reasonable measures to reduce risks were disproportionate to the benefit that could be achieved.
- Cost of additional controls > benefits
What is a significant risk?
- A risk is significant if it could impact in excess of the benchmark test for significance for that type of risk.
- Benchmark tests can reduce the number of identified risks from hundreds or thousands to those few which are most significant and which we must treat first.
- An example of a benchmark test for significance = FIRM risk scorecard.
Provide examples of a typical benchmark test for significance for the components of the FIRM risk scorecard.
FINANCIAL
• Impact on balance sheet of 0.25%
• Profit and loss impact of 2.5% of annual profit
INFRASTRUCTURE
• Destruction to normal operations of 1/2 day
• Increased cost of operation exceeds 10% budget
REPUTATIONAL
• Share price falls by 10%
• Event is on national TV, radio, or newspapers
MARKETPLACE
• Impact on balance sheet of 0.5% turnover
• Profit and loss impact of 1% annual profit
Define ‘risk analysis’ according to ISO 31000
- According to ISO 31000, risk evaluation is the final element of risk assessment.
- It compares the results of risk analysis with the established risk criteria (appetite) to determine where additional action is required.
- Therefore, it’s a decision point in which we decide whether or not to respond to risk.
Define ‘risk appetite’ according to ISO guide 73.
Risk appetite is the amount and type of risk that an organisation is willing to pursue or retain.
Define ‘risk appetite’ according to IRM (2011).
- Risk appetite is the amount of risk that an organisation is willing to seek or accept in the pursuit of it’s long-term objectives
- Those risks that an organisation actually wants to engage with.
List two aims of risk appetite.
- Aids consistent approach to risk management across the organisation.
- Supports consistent decision making about how to respond to risk.
- Reduces overall risk exposure
- Reduces bias
Who is responsible for defining the risk appetite?
The board
Define the following terms:
A. Risk tolerance
B. Risk capacity
C. Risk universe
A. The boundaries of taking risk outside of which the organisation is not prepared to venture in pursuit of it’s long-term objectives (if push comes to shove, the organisation might just be able to put up with).
B. The maximum level to which the organisation should be exposed, having regard to financial an other resources.
C. All the risks which the organisation might face.
“The risk tolerance (capacity) of an organisation is likely to be a subset of the risk appetite and the risk universe.”
Explain why this statement is incorrect.
- The IRM guide show clearly that the risk appetite is a sub-set of the risk tolerance (capacity)
- Risk tolerance (capacity) is a sub-set of the risk universe
Draw a diagram that links risk with uncertainty (i.e the range of outcomes for different risk exposures)
See Figure 25.2 ‘Risk and Uncertainty’ Hopkin (2018).
• By including all three types of risk (hazard, control, and opportunity) in a single figure, it is possible to demonstrate that the three types of risk are related, interdependent, and form a continuum.
Describe the six stages of Risk Appetite Statement.
- Identify stakeholder expectations
- making reference to CSFSRS - Define Company-wide risk exposure
- through analysis of STOC - Established the desired level of risk exposure
- that will lead to a RAS that provides a set of qualitative and quantitative statements). - Define the range of acceptable uncertainty around each of the types or risks
- leading to a statement of acceptable risk tolerances - Reconcile the risk appetite and risk tolerances with the current level of risk exposure
- and plan actions to bring exposure in line with risk appetite - Formalise and ratify a RAS
- communicate the statement with stakeholders and implement accordingly.
What is the equation for loss control?
LOSS CONTROL = LOSS PREVENTION + DAMAGE LIMITATION + COST CONTAINMENT
- Loss prevention -> focus on reducing likelihood
- Damage limitation -> focus on reducing magnitude
- Cost containment -> focus on reducing impact and consequences
Describe what is meant by the term ‘loss control’.
- Loss control explains the need to identify appropriate control measures to prevent a risk materialising, limit the damage, and contain the costs.
- Loss control describes how we can minimise the potential losses by identifying appropriate control measures to treat HAZARD type risks after having completed risk analysis.
- Designed to reduce the likelihood and magnitude of losses by changing the characteristics of exposure so that is it more acceptable to the firm.
- Loss control is concerned with the mitigation of the magnitude, impact and consequences of an adverse event.