Module 3 Flashcards
(37 cards)
Business Ethics
Common Business Stakeholders
- Owners/Shareholders (existing & potential) (stock value)
- Creditors/Suppliers (credit or investment)
- Employees (jobs, pensions)
- Customers (products, private info)
- Society at large (environment, products)
- Government Agencies (IRS, SEC, EPA, Funding)
Decisions by accountants and auditors can affect many different groups who rely on their work products. Many of these stakeholders are obvious, but others are not so obvious to everyone. Vendors and suppliers grant credit based on financial data provided directly or from credit rating agencies who use published or available financial data.
Employees or job applicants may rely on financial data in deciding to stay with a company or starting to work for one. Decisions on selecting their 401k plan investment selections that include company stock could also be made in error if provided financial data or auditor reports is unreliable.
Taxing, regulatory and funding agencies also frequently rely on data provided by accountants and auditors in carrying out their responsibilities.
Business Ethics
Ethical Issues in Business
- Honesty:
- Should be part of one’s moral values – generally checked by background checks
- Many people are actually dishonest at time if immaterial are involved (e.g., office supplies, don’t tell cashier of error in their favor)
- Abe Lincoln once said: “No man has a good enough memory to be a successful liar.” That’s one reason why auditors compare evidence for inconsistencies and potential untruthfulness.
- Fairness:
- Sometimes, we use a lower standard in dealings with competitors.
- Fairness is the standard for presented F.S.(GAAP compliant)
- Fairness is also being objective in interpreting GAAP.
- Fairness is basis for the Truth in Negotiations Act in federal contracting.
- Conflicts of Interest:
- A common solution: Disclosure & then recuse oneself.
- State of CA has reporting of financial relationships by designated officials.
- Most research also requires disclosure of potential conflicts of interest.
- Discrimination: This is all about treating everyone with equal respect.
- Information technology: Very important now as it relates to data privacy.
- Fraud – see the next slide
Business Ethics
Seven Signs of Ethical Collapse
According to Marianne Jennings, ethical collapse in financial reporting occurs when any organization has drifted from the basic principles of right and wrong.
- Pressure to maintain numbers
- Fear and silence
- Young staff and bigger than life CEO (loyalty)
- Weak board of directors
- Conflicts of interests overlooked or unaddressed (Enron’s SPEs)
- Innovation like no other company (better than others)
- Goodness in some areas atones for evil in others (rationalization)
Business Ethics
Ethical Dissonance Model
- Represents situation where your personal ethical values are at odds with that of your employer, which could mean that you may make different decisions at work than you would in your personal life.
- Four potential fit options:
- 1: high-high (high organization & high individual ethics) = ethical decisions
- 2: low-low (low organization & low individual ethics) = unethical decisions
- 3: high-low (high organization & low individual ethics) = conflict; go either way
- 4: low-high (low organization & high individual ethics) = conflict; go either way
- When employer and personal ethical values differ, there can be a difference between what one believes is the ethical thing to do and what they actually do.
- This frequently occurs when one rationalizes that the end result justifies the means – a rationalization of the decision actually made.
- Ethics hotlines can be used to mitigate such risks IF top management or those charged with governance have similar personal ethical values.
Fraud.
Types of Business Fraud
- Corruption (bribes, kickbacks, gratuities)
- Misappropriation or Theft of Assets (embezzlement, theft, misuse)
- Fraudulent Financial Report (including F.S.)
(Association of Certified Fraud Examiners = all 3; AICPA = 2 & 3)
Except for number 1, virtually everyone considers these actions to be unethical. For bribes, some people do not see these as unethical if such is considered commonplace in a location. In the U.S. and many other countries, bribing government officials is illegal both domestically and internationally.
Vendor kickbacks or gratuities to employees are also rationalized as not impacting their judgment and not increasing the prices their employers pay.
Fraudulent financial reporting is what transpired at Phar_Mor.
Fraud
Detection of Fraud
- Tips – About 40 – 50%
- Since 2010, management review 2nd – 15%
- Internal (14%) & External Auditors (4%)
- Accidental – 7%
These statistics about business fraud detection comes from the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners in their latest Annual Report to the Nation.
Because of concealment actions made by perpetrators, the most common way to detect fraud is not from auditors and reviewers, but from tips from insiders. These individuals are commonly referred to as “Whistle Blowers”.
Fraud
External Auditor Overall Responsibility
This responsibility applies to all financial statement audits and the level of responsibilities have increased over the years after significant fraud has went undetected and expanded responsibilities were desired by stakeholders. But, as you can see from the limiting words like “reasonable assurance” versus “absolute assurance” and “material” versus “any fraud”, there is a significant risk that auditors will not detect all fraud.
Aids to Increase Fraud Detection
- Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) Requirements:
- Implementation of control procedures
- Corporate Governance
- Hot Lines (internal, external, regulatory)
- Increased whistle blowing avenues
- Codes of ethics with reminding & training
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other legislation passed, and regulations implemented, after the financial crisis of the mid-2000s has increased fraud detection abilities, especially with whistle blowers.
However, do whistle blowers always go far enough to root out fraud they are aware of? How about Sherron Watkins at Enron? She only reported the fraud internally, although she did go to the Chairman of the Board of Directors. Was she too much concerned about her own interests rather that those of others?
Some organizations not only have codes of conduct, but also require annual refresher training – like UC.
Fraud
Protection of Whistle Blowers
These whistle blowers highlighted fraud or other wrongdoing. Cynthia Cooper at WorldCom stopped major F.S. fraud by not stopping within her change of command and went to several independent board members. Coleen Rowley was an FBI employee that reported a number of FBI lapses in missing opportunities to stop the 9/11 terrorists attacks. She also went beyond her change of command to Congress Elevating concerns to higher levels or to persons outside of one’s employer can be perceived as too great a risk to one’s self interests.
Fraud
Impact of SOX on Fraud
- More fraud detected by management reviews
- More Accountability (CEO & CFO & Below)
- More Emphasis on Internal Controls (risk assessment & testing by companies)
- Required policies and procedures
- Maintenance of records
- Recording of transactions
- Prevention or detection of fraud
- Estimated fraud losses reduced 70 to 96%
Most people believe that SOX did reduce the likelihood and severity of financial statement fraud in the U.S. and also the ability to detect fraud that has occurred by both insiders and the external auditors. SOX not only requires more preventions and detection tools, but it also added more accountability.
CEO & CFOs must certify both the financial statements and related internal controls over financial reporting. Some CFOs flow-down the certification to their subordinates as well.
External auditors for issuers (public companies) have their audit performance inspected by a governmental agency rather than another CPA firm. Poor external auditor performance can result in the CPA firm or individual auditors being suspended or banned from doing audits of issuers.
Corporate Governance
AICPA Definition
For corporations, these persons are generally the members of the board of directors. For all issuers, this board MUST include non-management or independent members and the board’s audit committee is to be composed of only these independent members. Also, the audit committee for issuers must oversee not only the financial reporting process, but also the hiring and overseeing of the external auditors.
Management is also defines as the person(s) with executive responsibility for the conduct of the entity’s operations. For some entities, management includes some or all of those charged with governance; for example, executive members of a governance board or an owner-manager. Non-issuers do not have to have independent board members, unless required by their lenders or corporate bylaws.

Corporate Governance
Protecting Investors
- Defines relationships among:
- Stakeholders
- Management
- Board of Directors
- Influences how company is run.
Although the concept of corporate governance is not new, it is now a formal term and has the interest of many stakeholders.
Since the passage SOX, the SEC and the PCAOB have also realized the importance of competent corporate governance in protecting investors.
Corporate Governance
Pillars of Corporate Governance
- Responsibility
- Accountability
- Fairness
- Transparency
The foundations of corporate governance is generally considered to include the proper assignment of responsibility, holding individuals accountable for their actions or inactions, the concept of fairness that we covered earlier and the concept that most corporate actions should not be secret, but shared as appropriate, otherwise known now as transparency.
Corporate Governance
Benefits of Good Governance
- More Confidence/Less Risk (perception of stakeholders)
- Better access to capital
- Aids economic growth
- Positive impact on stock prices
- Ensures business operates fairly & transparently
- Ensures that management is held accountable
- Helps ensure sustainability (profitability, growth)
There are many benefits to having sound and competent corporate governance and the overall benefit is that the various stakeholders have more trust in their dealings with the corporation. And good organizational governance offers similar to other organizations like universities, nonprofits and governmental entities.
For financial reporting reliability, the attributes of accountability, fairness & transparency generally active involvement of the external members of the board of directors/those charged with governance as their performance is not reported on in the F.S. – unlike that of management.
Corporate Governance
Corporate Governance Systems
- Corporate governance systems establish control mechanisms to ensure organizational values guide decision-making and ethical standards are being followed. Characteristics include: Accountability, Oversight and Control.
- Corporate governance can be seen as a set of rules that define the relationship between stakeholders, management and board of directors and influence how that company operates.
Corporate Governance
Corporate Agency Theory
- Managers & directors are agents of the shareholders.
- Shareholders are the principals.
- Rules & incentives should encourage behavior of agents that satisfy desires of the principals.
Corporate agency theory is the concept that management and other employees of a corporation are acting as agents of the shareholders or owners and owners should be able to expect that their interests are being protected by their agents.
With the stock option back dating scandals around 2006, management did not protect the interests of stockholders, but that of other executives.
Corporate Governance
Why doesn’t agency theory always work?
- Desires and goals of agents and principals may not be in agreement as sometimes reward systems for agents are short-term.
- Difficult to verify the activities of the agents as they develop & control reporting, plus there are significant limits on sharing information with stakeholders under SEC rules.
- These shortcomings to the agency theory are the primary reasons why we have auditors, especially independent auditors
Corporate Governance
Agency Cost
- Agents are somewhat more likely to place personal goals ahead of corporate/shareholder goals.
- Consistent with egoism theory.
- Conflict of interests between agents and principals – esp. in financial statements.
- Increases if the Board of Directors fails to exercise due care in their oversight and governance.
These costs can be minimized by ensuring that the shortcomings discussed earlier are avoided or minimized. However, principals generally hope that linking the compensation and rewards to organizational financial performance should add value for the principals in the future. However, financial performance reporting can be manipulated. This is where the accountants and auditors must be good agents for the principals.
Corporate Governance.
Stakeholders other than Stockholders
- Employees (job security, pensions)
- Employee Governance
- Employee share ownership
- Employee representation on Board of Directors
- Employee involvement in governing committees
Accountants and auditors sometimes do not think about employees as stakeholders in their work and work products. But they frequently are as the result of many financial frauds is company layoffs or decrease in the value of company stock that employees may own. Enron went out of business and the employee 401k plan was heavy on Enron stock. Enron’s external audit firm, Arthur Andersen, also went out of business.
Governance Mechanisms
Internal Governance
Internal:
- Independent Directors
- Audit Committee (public companies: independent Dir)
- Management
- Internal Controls
- Internal Audit
Corporate or organizational governance is primarily the responsibility of groups that are part of the corporation or organization. Many board members are from management (officers of the company), but “Independent “members are not part of top management of the organization. However, sometimes the charisma of a CEO can effectively reduce their independence. For public companies, Audit Committee members are only independent directors. Internal audit is more effective when they have a direct link to Audit Committee.
Governance Mechanisms
External Governance
External:
- Financial markets and analysts
- Stock exchange listing requirements
- State &federal laws and regulations
- Court decisions/penalties (FCPA)
- Shareholder proposals/Large shareholder
- External auditors
- SOX-Required CEO/CFO Code of Ethics
The existence of external governance mechanisms is primarily at issuers or public companies or public organizations like state universities and colleges. After SOX, external auditors are more linked to Audit Committee and PCAOB is trying to increase communication between them, including sharing of PCAOB inspection results
Governance Mechanisms
Role of Board of Directors (BOD) & Officers
- BOD has ultimate responsibility for success or failure of company.
- Principles must be part of the culture:
- Ethical and honest behavior
- Compliance with laws and regulations
- Effective management of resources and risks
- Accountability of personnel
- Establish ethical culture and code of conduct.
- Communicate these principles within organization.
- Board members have fiduciary duty to safeguard assets and make decisions that promote shareholder interest.
- Business Judgment Rule – managers and BOD immune from liability so long as decisions made in good faith and with reasonable skill and prudence.
Governance Mechanisms
BOD’s Audit Committee
- Independent directors
- Oversight of financial reporting, internal audit & external auditors
- SOX mandated – independence; financial expertise
- Listing requirement of NYSE
- Seen as the one body that should be able to prevent fraudulent financial reporting.
- Committee should meet separately with the senior executives, internal auditors and the external auditors.
Governance Mechanisms
Best Practices of Audit Committees
- Focus on financial reporting & strong internal controls.
- Review company’s whistleblower processes & compliance program.
- Understand significant risks to the company’s operations and financial reporting.
- Consider whether the company’s disclosures provide investors with the information needed to understand the state of the business.
- Set clear expectations for the internal audit function and communication with the external auditors.
- Understand the audit committee’s role in information technology.