Module 4 Flashcards
(42 cards)
Concerns of CPAs
Recurring Concerns for CPAs
At Enron, there were allegations that the audit firm was not objective in its auditing because of links between the CPA firm and Enron’s accounting department and the extent of profitable non-audit services provided by the CPA firm.
Focus of investigations & reviews:
- Non-audit services impairing auditor independence
- Management needs to report on internal controls
- Prevention & detection of fraud
Until 2002, professional organizations, such as the AICPA, (rather than Congress) enhanced minimum expectations through changes to code of conduct and auditing standards.
Concerns of CPAs
Why Ethics
- Compliance required of all AICPA members, even CPAs working as accountants.
- Basis for CPA ethics rules in each state.
- (So noncompliance can affect CPA License, even if working as an Accountant.)
- PCAOB partially adopted as their interim standards.
- Some rules only apply to members in public practice.
- Some Rules only apply to certain types of engagements or to certain class of clients.

Concerns of CPAs
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
Four Sections
- The code is composed of these 4 sections.
- Most interpretations and ethical rulings deal with the first Rule on independence, which primarily applies to CPAs in public practice
Now, let’s look at the guiding principles.

AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
The Principles
As you can see, the Principles are broad and much like Motherhood and Apple Pie. These principles generally apply to all CPAs, like Objectivity, whereas Independence is required only for Attest-type engagements:
- All Attest Engagement
- Audits of F.S.

AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
The Principles
Responsibilities
Responsibilities
In carrying out their responsibilities as professionals, members should exercise sensitive professional and moral judgments in all their activities.
According to the AICPA code:
- CPAs have responsibilities to all those who use their professional services.
- Members also have a continuing responsibility to cooperate with each other to improve the art of accounting, maintain the public’s confidence, and carry out the profession’s special responsibilities for self-governance.
- The collective efforts of all members are required to maintain and enhance the traditions of the profession.
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
The Principles
The Public Trust
The Public Trust
Members should accept the obligation to act in a way that will:
- Serve the public interest
- Honor the public trust
- Demonstrate commitment to professionalism
According to the AICPA code:
- A distinguishing mark of a profession is acceptance of its responsibility to the public. The accounting profession’s public consists of clients, credit grantors, governments, employers, investors, the business and financial community, and others who rely on the objectivity and integrity of certified public accountants to maintain the orderly functioning of commerce. This reliance imposes a public interest responsibility on certified public accountants.
- The public interest is defined as the collective well-being of the community of people and institutions the profession serves.
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
The Principles
Integrity
Integrity
To maintain and broaden public confidence, members should perform all professional responsibilities with the highest sense of integrity.
According to the AICPA code:
- Integrity requires a member to be, among other things, honest and candid within the constraints of client confidentiality.
- Service and the public trust should not be subordinated to personal gain and advantage.
- Integrity can accommodate the inadvertent error and the honest difference of opinion; it cannot accommodate deceit or subordination of principle.
- Integrity is something that is expected of all professionals, like doctors, architects and your home remodeling contractor.
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
The Principles
Objectivity and Independence
Objectivity and Independence
A member should maintain objectivity and be free of conflicts of interest in discharging professional responsibilities
A member in public practice should be independent in fact and appearance when providing auditing and other attestation services.
This is the principle that is frequently mentioned as possibly being violated when the reliability of an auditor’s results are questioned.
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
The Principles
Due Care
Due Care
A member should observe the profession’s technical and ethical standards, strive continually to improve competence and the quality of services, and discharge professional responsibility to the best of the member’s ability.
This is the principle that is frequently cited as being violated when an auditor sued for negligence.
AICPA Code of Professional Conduct
The Principles
Scope and Nature of Services
A member in public practice should observe the principles of the Code of Professional Conduct in determining the scope and nature of services to be provided.
The concept behind this principle is that accountants and auditors should not be providing services for which they are not competent or have a current knowledge of standards they are to follow, such as GAAP or other engagement performance standards.
Rule 101: Independence
Independence
This is by far, the most complex and restrictive of the Rules. Also, this is where the overall guiding “practical” rule applies.
“Do what’s right, even to the CPA’s personal disadvantage.”
Good intentions are not enough since Independence must be in fact and appearance to instill public trust and confidence. In the work and work products of CPAs.
Independence.
Fact and Appearance
Means independence in fact and appearance - so, rules may appear too restrictive.
- Applies to all attest (not just audit) engagements.
- Why is independence important?
Independence
Assurance
CPAs are providing assurance on data reliability to 3rd party users.
On attest engagements, CPAs are generally hired to perform tests of assertions or statements made by client management and issue an opinion as to whether the assertion or statement is fairly stated or reliable. The report is desired generally because the client is providing it to a 3rd party who wants to rely on the assertion to make a decision.
Independence
AICPA Conceptual Framework for Independence
The perspective used throughout is whether a reasonable person, aware of all the relevant facts, would conclude that an unacceptable risk to independence exists.
The framework is a decision flowchart used to evaluate threats to a CPA’s independence. When a threat arises, the approach considers:
- Whether the Code directly addresses the threat and
- If the Code does not directly address the threat, the auditor considers whether adequate safeguards exist to eliminate or mitigate the threat to independence to an acceptably low level.
Independence
AICPA Conceptual Framework for Evaluating Threats to Independence
In determining whether safeguards “sufficiently mitigate” a risk to independence, the CPA is to assess how a relationship with a client would be perceived by that reasonable person.
In the Code, there is at least one example whether the Code provides for such a mitigation: former employment of a CPA by an attest client where the CPA firm’s independence is not impaired if the CPA who used to work for the client is “totally disassociated” from an attest engagement that covers part of the prior employment period.
Independence Impairment
3 Stage Process
3 Stage Process
Determining if independence is impaired for a CPA firm is a 3-Stage Process
Is independence of individual auditor impaired?
- When did it occur?
- What was the relationship?
If individual auditor independence is impaired, is the CPA firm impaired?
- Who in the firm is involved?
Taking an independence problem step-by-step makes it easier to solve.
Note: Interpretation 101-17 defined “Firm” to include network or associated organizations which may be separate legal entities and provided criteria for determining this.
Independence Impairment
When: Period of Professional Engagment
While you are engaged
- Conducting planning and field work
- Rendering opinion/drafting report
- Begins when engagement letter signed or agreement reached, or CPA starts work.
Period engaged continues until attest relationship ends by formal or informal notice from either CPA or client.
Independence Impairment
SEC and PCAOB Independence Rules
Specific Rules:
- Prohibits certain non-audit services.
- Requires prior approval of non-audit services by client’s audit committee.
- Requires lead & concurring partner rotation.
- Prohibits any partner compensation based on obtaining non-audit or non-attest work.
- Requires 1-year gap before someone who worked on the audit can accept job with client for certain positions (cooling off period).
AICPA Rule Responsibilities
Rule 102: Integrity and Objectivity
In the performance of any professional service, a member shall maintain objectivity and integrity, shall be free of conflicts of interest, and shall not knowingly misrepresent facts or subordinate his or her judgment to others.
- This rule applies to All engagements, including tax work.
- This rule even applies to employees who are AICPA members esp. as it relates to integrity and knowingly doing some which is known to be wrong, including an accountant role in:
- Recording transactions and preparing F.S., including taking instructions from his superiors
- Being candid and without misrepresentations or incomplete responses with his employer’s external CPA
- AICPA Ethical Ruling #113: Gifts or Entertainment can impair objectivity if not reasonable in the circumstances. They can impair integrity if CPA knew they violated client or CPA firm vendor policy.
- See supplemental handout for a summary of the applicability of each of the Rules of the Code.
AICPA Rule Responsibilities
ET Section 55, Article IV - Objectivity and Independence
A member should maintain objectivity and be free of conflicts of interest in discharging (all) professional responsibilities. A member in public practice should be independent in fact and appearance when providing auditing and other attestation services.
Objectivity is something that the CPA must use in drawing his conclusions and opinions, while independence is only required when a CPA is providing conclusions or opinions which are likely to be provided to 3rd parties.
AICPA Rule Responsibilities
ET Section 55, Article IV - Objectivity and Independence
.01
Objectivity is a state of mind, a quality that lends value to a member’s services. It is a distinguishing feature of the profession. The principle of objectivity imposes the obligation to be impartial, intellectually honest, and free of conflicts of interest.
Independence precludes relationships that may appear to impair a member’s objectivity in rendering attestation services.
Many students are confused as to the difference between objectivity and independence, and the difference is subtle in that independence represents relationships that might impair one’s objectivity.
AICPA Rule Responsibilities.
Rule 201: General Standards
A member shall comply with the following standards and with any interpretations thereof by bodies designated by Council.
A. Professional Competence
B. Due Professional Care
C. Planning and Supervision
D. Sufficient Relevant Data
This rule applies to all services. Basically says that a CPA must comply with the auditing standards in the General & Field Work categories, except: Independence (already a separate Rule) Understanding internal controls and the client and its environment as such is not applicable to all engagements. Later we will identify the “bodies designated by the AICPA.
AICPA Rule Responsibilities
Rule 202: Compliance with Standards
A member who performs auditing, review, compilation, management consulting, tax, or other professional services shall comply with standards promulgated by bodies designated by Council.
This rule basically says that the CPA must comply with whatever standards cover a particular engagement type.
AICPA Rule Responsibilities
Rule 203: Accounting Principles
A member shall not:
1) express an opinion or state affirmatively that the financial statements or other financial data of any entity are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles or
2) state that he or she is not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such statements or data in order for them to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, if such statements or data contain any departure from an accounting principle . . .
This rule basically requires a CPA to measure what a client has reported when generally accepted accounting principles are the appropriate criteria.