Module 6: a transdiagnostic perspective on compulsivity & habit-based interventions Flashcards

1. Module background 1-7, 2. Lecture 8-48, 3. Gardner 2024 49-72, 4. Verhoeven 73-79 (80 cards)

1
Q

Habit-based interventions aim to promote lasting behavior change, by doing (2)

A
  1. buiding desirable habits
  2. breaking undesired ones
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

self-report measures of habit (12) / the self-report habit index (SRHI) items, for now just aim to list the 3 broad categories that these items are divided into

A

Has been used most extensively to study real-life habits
1. I do frequently
2. I do automatically
3. I do without having to consciously remember
4. that makes me feel weird if I do not do it
5. I do without thinking
6. that would require effort not to do it
7. that belongs to my (daily, weekly, monthly) routine
8. I start doing before I realize that I’m doing it
9. I would find hard not to do
10. I have no need to think about doing
11. that is typically me
12. that I have been doing for a long time

categorized into:
1. Repetition
2. Automaticity
3. identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The Self-Report behavioral automaticity index

A

4-item subscale from the SRHI consisting of items 2,5,8,10

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Implementation intentions are

A

if-then plans that can help people achieve their goals by specifying critical situations and linking these to the desired behavior

e.g., If I watch television and feel hungry, then I eat fruit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Concrete II’s work better than

A

goal intentions

e.g., I’m going to eat healthier/do sports/go jogging

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

According to the ‘instant habit’ theory, II’s work so well because

A

II’s describe the desired S-R habit or a mental association that is made between the critical cues and the desired behavior

–> this ensures that behavior can be triggered automatically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

II’s are also effective because they focus on

A

critical cues so that every opportunity to carry out the desired behavior is recognized and used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Compulsivity broad definition

A

behavior that is continued despite the person being aware of the detrimental consequences

  • these can be health-related, social or professional functioning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the lecture about?

A

a transdiagnostic perspective on compulsivity & habit-based interventions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Definition of a transdiagnostic perspective on compulsivity

A

common psychological/neurobiological processes are thought to underlie behavior that is continued despite explicit knowledge of devastating negative consequences in various disorders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

in part 2 of the course, you will look for those transdiagnostic processes including: (3)

A
  • learning processes
    – Pos vs neg reinforcement vs punishment
    – Pavlovian versus instrumental conditioning
  • cognitive control processes
  • neurobiological processes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Endophenotype

A

biological or psychological phenomena of a disorder believed to be in the causal chain between genetic contributions to a disorder and diagnosable symptoms of psychopathology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Our course’s transdiagnostic perspective on compulsivity is in line with that of the Research domain criteria institute’s framework which…

A

considers mental health and psychopathology in the context of major domains of psychological neurobio processes rather than within established diagnostic categories

–> both emphasize interactions between different processes as constituting a disorder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

the possible utility of a transdiagnostic perspective

A

may open up new ways of exploring not only their development, co-morbidity, but most importantly this may provide new targets for prevention and treatment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

intention-behavior gap

A

the phenomenon that people have explicit decisions to change their behavior but fail to take action

  • medium-large change in intention -> small-to-medium change in behavior
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

how does the intention-behavior gap pose a challenge for motivational models

A

motivational models posit that intention is the main determinant of behavior but the intention-behavior gap goes against that

intention does not always lead to a behavior

examples of motivational models:
* health belief model
* theory of reasoned action
* theory of planned behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

the intention-behavior gap also points to limitations of what types of interventions

A

purely information-driven behavior change interventions
(and ofc the motivational model inspired interventions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Habits can explain the gap between intentions and behavior

A

As behavior repeatedly takes place, habit increases and becomes a better predictor of behavior than behavioral intentions
- Triandis, 1977

using habits we could study how to effectively change behavior through interventions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Habits general information (3)

A

A) Almost half of our daily behaviors is performed in the same manner in the same situations
B) Habits allow for efficiency
C) Habits can also be disadvantageous because they make behavior inflexible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Investigating habits in real life can be done in 2 ways

A

A) field experiments
- Neal’s popcorn experiment

B) Self-report measures
- SRHI: taps into the subjective experience of habit/automaticity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

The 4-item self-report behavioral automaticity index of SRHI items, suitable for when?

A

2) I do automatically
3) I do without having to consciously remember
5) I do without thinking
8) I start doing before I realize I’m doing it

suitable for everyday assessment of automaticity of behavior (its short)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

example of an experiment using the SRHI

The role of habits in a snacking experiment + results

A

Phase 1: habit strength measure (SRHI) and intention regarding snacking (+a power of food questionnaire)

Phase 2 (1 month later): 7-day snack diary

Results: Habit strength was the best predictor of unhealthy snacking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Using questionnaires to track habits: repeated measurement of automaticity across behavioral repetitions shows that

A

with repetition, automaticity (habits) increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

reinforcement in the role of habit formation + example

A

short-term reward (or absence of aversive consequences) are also an important determinant of habit formation

e.g., self-reported automaticity of a new habit of flossing was predicted by how pleasurable participants found this behavior to be (fits with the law of effect)

in contrast the perceived health benefits did NOT predict how fast the flossing became a habit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
disadvantages of self-report measures (3)
* Subjective * Self-report of automatic behaviour * Nonetheless, there is evidence that such measures can reliably predict behaviour
26
the role of habits in other behaviors (6)
* consumer behavior * unhealthy snacking * smoking * drinking alcohol * fruit consumption * exercise
27
Real world habit research in humans corresponds to animal research in identifying 3 determinants of habit formation
1. repetition - overtraining leads to insensitivity to outcome devaluation of 'behavioral autonomy' 2. context - insensitivity to outcome devaluation due to overtraining is context specific 3. reward - habits form faster with drug rewards than with natural rewards
28
Therefore our daily behavior is not always determined by intentions, habits also play a role. When do habits override intentions and vice versa?
That depends on the availability of self-control resources --> behavior is determined by the interaction between intentions, habits and self-control resources
29
when self-control is high (3)
– Intentions determine in the absence of habits – Habits can support intentions: when habit for the intended behaviour is strong, this renders strong motivation/intention at the choice point unnecessary, thereby freeing up cognitive resources. – Conflicting habits can compete with intentions --> the balance between these competing forces determine behavior
30
when self-control is low (due to fatigue, stress, distraction)
habits are the main determinant of behavior so making healthy behavior a habit may shield against momentary motivation loss (when your goal is to be healthy)
31
Interim summary (4)
* Behavior change is challenging -> ‘Intention-behavior gap’ * Much of our daily behavior is habitual. * Real-life habits can be investigated in field experiments and self-report measures (SRHI, SRBAI) * Intention X Habit X Self-control interaction
32
You’re conducting an investigation of the formation of an exercise routine. During 6 weeks, you want to obtain a daily measure that reflects the subjective experience of habit formation. Which measure would be optimal to use? 1. Primed lexical-decision task 2. Self-reported habit index 3. Self-reported behavioral automaticity scale
Answer: 3) Self-reported behavioral automaticity scale - since 6 weeks is a long time, it's better to administer a short questionnaire like the SRBAI since it has fewer items
33
How are current behavior change interventions lacking?
interventions and campaigns that try to motivate, change goals and provide information do not directly impact on S-R associations motivation is what gets you started but habit is what keeps you going
34
Goal intentions vs implementions intentions
Goal intentions: I will lose 5 kilos Implementation intentions: If I'm in situation X, then I will take my medication * II's are if-then plans that link a critical cue to an instrumental action * specific if-then structure is important
35
why are goal intentions usually ineffective?
they force you to be motivated ALL the time in order to do the intended behavior
36
how do implementation intentions work?
In implementation an S-R formation forms over time just like in habits so it's almost like an instant habit but in II's the S-R association is formed differently - instead of repetition like in habits II's form S-R associations through conscious planning - it is strategic automaticity
37
2 working mechanisms of II's
1) If: heightened cue accessibility -> detection of situation 2) If-then: strong stimulus-response link -> automatic activation of instrumental response + II's promote behavioral repetition in a stable context, so also gradual habit formation happens
38
# 7 steps of behavior change Step 1
Choose a behavior that you are highly motivated to change - strong intention and intrinsic motivation are crucial for effectiveness of implementation intentions - combination of MI could be beneficial
39
# 7 steps for behavior change Step 2
Determine the critical cue: in which situation do you carry out the "bad habit" - identifying the 'if' - preferably the cue or behavior reliably precedes the behavior and can be easily noticed - can be external vs. internal cue
40
# 7 steps for behavior change Step 2: external vs. internal cues (Adriaanse et al., method + results)
Adriaanse, de Ridder & de Wit: II's with cue provided by researcher OR personal cue Method: * situational cues *If I come home and feel like snacking, then I will eat an apple* * motivational cue (comparable with internal cues) *If I am bored and I feel like snacking then I will eat an apple* dependent variable = *change in snacking* Results: Implementation intention: * more healthy snacks * less unhealthy snacks **but only when a personal, internal motivational cue was used**
41
# 7 steps for behavior change Step 2: two strategies for determining critical cues
Strategy 1: Cue monitoring diary helps to identify critical cue Strategy 2: Mental contrasting = contrasting positive future with negative reality - raises awareness of the distance from the goal -> goal commitment - aids identification of obstacles/critical cues that hinder goal realization -> 'if!'
42
# 7 steps for behavior change Step 3
Can the critical cue easily be avoided/changed? / Could we just avoid and change the cue to stop a behavior?? **Habit discontinuity hypothesis:** avoiding the old context disrupts old S-R habits, which may allow one to rethink new behaviors and choices
43
# 7 steps for behavior change Step 3: experimental evidence for habit discontinuity hypothesis
* T1: intervention sustainability (info, motivating, goal setting) * after 8 weeks: T2: post measurement sustainable behavior Results: the intervention was most successful for people who had moved house recently (< 3 months)
44
# 7 steps for behavior change Step 3 changing the context: nudging (3)
changing the context to promote the desired behavior - e.g., availability of popcorn vs. apples determines which is eaten more --> more apple available --> you eat more apple - also placing healthy fruits is accessible places can nudge healthy choices
45
# 7 steps for behavior change Step 4
Link the right action to your critical cue - the 'then's - usually making the action a negation of something doesn't work (e.g., "then don't sleep) = **Ironic process theory** = attempts to suppress a thought actually renders it more salient and makes one more conscious of it instead habit substitution/replacement: replacing the old, unwanted response to a cue with a new, wanted, competing response
46
# 7 steps for behavior change Step 5
Continue to monitor your behavior and adjust your plan if it is no longer optimal * II's as metacognitive strategy * e.g., if one behavior alternative isn't effective anymore, change it
47
# 7 steps for behavior change Step 6
Once you have formed this habit, you can consider changing other habits multiple II's at the same time are not effective for behavior change esp when it pertains to the same behavior
48
# 7 steps for behavior change Step 7
don't forget to celebrate your success by rewarding yourself
49
Boundary conditions / could habit-based interventions work for all target populations and behaviors?
* when daily structure/regularity is low, it is challenging to build new routines (van de Vijver et al., 2023). * Vice versa, in highly conscientious people, the added benefit of a habit-based intervention may be low because they adopt the strategies mentioned above spontaneously (van de Vijver et al., 2023). * When motivation is low, motivational interviewing can – for instance - be a valuable addition to the intervention
50
What does the review by Gardner et al. strive to do?
to narrow the gap between habit theory and the reality of human behavior 'in the wild'
51
What kinds of critiques has the habit theory received? (3)
1. Persistence of habitual responses even when they no longer serve valued goals is not reliably replicated in humans in real-world contexts 2. There is a question of whether complex behaviors can ever be truly automated 3. Some research suggests tha habit gains dissipate over time, instead of becoming long lasting and behavior changing Gardner and colleagues strive to answer these critiques thereby closing the gap between habit theory and 'in the wild' behavior
52
# 2.1 Habit is not habitual behavior According to the preferred definition in the source, how does habit generate behavior?
**habit is a cognitive process** whereby a (contextual) cue automatically triggers an impulse to act based on a cue-behavior association (learnt through consistent repetition in the presence of the cue) - Habits generate behavior by activating impulses, which then compete with other impulses to determine action --> so habit does not trigger behavior directly but activates impulses that energize behavior
53
# 2.1 Habit is not habitual behavior PRIME theory
frustrating/activating an impulse arouses a conscious desire to act furthermore all psychological influences on action operate through impulses and these compete with one another. Behavior is the result of an impulse that wins. - habit is only one source of impulses and impulses from other psychological processes may win
54
# 2.1 Habit is not habitual behavior What is the key difference between "habit" and "habitual behaviour"
"Habit" is the underlying cognitive construct that generates behavior, while "habitual behaviour" refers to the action that is produced by the habit process.
55
# 2.2 Multiple habits can contribute to any given action What is the difference between an instigation habit and an execution habit
* Instigation habits trigger an episode of behavior (e.g., taking a shower after encountering the cue of waking up) * Execution habits automate the performance of the steps within that episode of behavior (e.g., executing the actual steps necessary for taking the shower, running water, using soap etc.) !!! the authors use 'habitual behavior' to refer to these two types of habits interchangeably
56
# 2.2 Multiple habits can contribute to any given action Implications of instigation habits vs. execution habits for changing a given behavior
Associations that habitually instigate action affect *whether* a behavior is enacted Associations between subservient behaviors affect *how* the behavior is performed
57
# 2.3 Complex behaviors can be habitually triggered why is the argument that effective habit formation interventions need to make complex behaviors fully habitual wrong?
a behavior can be both habitual and intentional * complex behaviors take longer to become a habit, yes * but the *start* of a complex behavior can become a habit because complexity of behavior is about execution, not instigation * **so forming instigation habits (the start of complex behaviors) should promote frequent repetition of simple and complex actions alike**
58
# 2.3. Complex behaviors can be habitually triggered example that shows a behavior can be both habitual and intentional at the same time
A person who consciously decides to take a shower (intentional instigation) may enact the in-shower sequence automatically (habitual execution) Remember that instigation habits and execution habits still refer to the same underlying psychological mechanism
59
# 3.0 The role of habit and intention in behavioral frequency What is the "habit-intention interaction hypothesis
The habit-intention interaction hypothesis proposes that as habit strengthens, the influence of intention on behavior in the presence of habit cues decreases, suggesting habit can override intention
60
# 3.1 Habit and intention can complementarily determine action selection Explain how intention and habit can come together to promote action selection + why does this happen?
If habit and intention align, they interact to strengthen the translation of intention into action - e.g., people who intend to use sunscreen are more likely to act if they have strong sunscreen use habits - habit forms through consistent in-context repetition, which assuming free will, is likely driven by strong enduring intentions --> habits are a locked in response that while no longer triggered by intention is nontheless aligned with it
61
# 3.2 Strong counterhabitual intention may override habit in long term When especially can stable and strong counterhabitual intentions override habits in the long term? (3)
especially when there is sufficient self-control, motivation and opportunity for inhibition
62
# 3.2 Strong counterhabitual intention may overrise habit in long term What are some reasons for why the potential for habit to override counterhabitual intentions fail to replicate in real-life contexts
1. lab tasks restrict people's self regulatory capacities which when available, consistently allow for inhibition of habit tendencies 2. lab tasks focus on simple behaviors that don't correspond to real-life behaviors in which opportunity for inhibition is greater 3. even when 'action slips' happen (habit overrides counterhabitual intention), these are by definition, exceptional failures to act as intended --> instead, with sufficient motivation and self-regulatory capacity (+ inhibition), intention generally overpowers habit
63
# 4.1 Habit formation may be neither necessary nor sufficient for change 3 reasons fow why habit formation may be neither necessary nor sufficient to sustain long-term behavior change
1. Habitual behaviors are cue-dependent so environmental changes that disrupt cue exposure will discontinue habitual action 2. any newly adopted behavior can be sustained by non-habit mechanisms like (enhanced liking or satisfaction with the decision to change) 3. strong counterhabitual intentions may override habits
64
# 4.2 habit formation creates memory traces that may reactivate behavior Are unenacted habit associations fully extinguished according to the source? What is the implication of this?
No, unenacted habits are argued to be weakened but not fully extinguished. This means they retain the capacity to be reactivated, which explains why old habitual behaviors can reappear after periods of not being performed.
65
# 5.1 Disrupting habitual behavior Describe the habit disruption strategy known as "habit inhibition."
Habit inhibition involves consciously and willfully stopping oneself from acting on a habit impulse. This can happen either before initiating the action sequence or during the sequence but before completion.
66
# 5.1 Disrupting habitual behavior Reducing behavioral accessibility and habit cue discontinuity
limit availability of a habitual behavior after the impulse is triggered or diminish the likelihood that a habit impulse is activated they can be temporary, permanent, purposeful or incidental in nature
67
# 5.1 Disrupting habitual behavior Reducing behavioral accessibility
adding friction so an action becomes unavailable or otherwise prohibitively effortful to enact - requires capability and opportunity to modify access in advance of the habit impulse being activated - purposeful: intentionally blocking gambling transactions - incidental: casino payment services failing, precluding gambling
68
# 5.1 Disrupting habitual behavior habit cue discontinuity
purposeful: knowingly limiting exposure to cues - requires awareness of potential cues - also requires for it to be easy to avoid cues incidental: naturally occurring context changes
69
# 5.2 What is the key mechanism of "habit substitution" for disrupting unwanted habits?
Habit substitution works by consistently performing an alternative, desired behavior in response to the cue that previously triggered the unwanted habit. The goal is to form a new, stronger association that displaces the old one.
70
# 6.1 Implications for habit formation interventions habit formation interventions should do: (3)
1. automate wanted actions 2. protect against dips in motivation 3. augmented with strategies to sustain favorable motivation
71
# 6.1 Implications for habit formation interventions when a habit formation approach is unfeasible? and what to do
with people with unpredictable or unstructured everyday lives --> non-habit mechanisms may better support lasting behavior change
72
# 6.2 Implicatio for habit disruption interventions what to consider about habit disruption
1. use only when a behavior is truly habitual 2. there needs to be sufficient self-regulation across many occasions so it may be unsuitable for those with long-term impairments in self regulation 3. lapses should be framed as temporary, permissible setbacks (they easily happen when there is not enough self-control or cue discontinuation is temporary)
73
# 6.2 Implications on habit disruption interventions Habit substitution, things to consider
1. whether 2. when 3. and how to employ inhibition or behavioral inaccessibility strategies to block established habitual behavior most effectively and how to best promote context-consistent repetition necessary to form a new alternative habit
74
what are the three generally regarded essential criteria for defining a habit?
* repetition (learned behaviours), * context stability (presence of specific cues), * automaticity.
75
How does Verhoeven et al describe automaticity in the context of habits, citing Bargh (1994)?
Automaticity, as proposed by Bargh (1994) and described in the text, includes four essential features: unintentionality, uncontrollability, lack of awareness, and efficiency.
76
What is the key difference between goal-directed behaviour and habitual behaviour according to dual-process theories?
Goal-directed behaviour is flexibly guided by current motivation and sensitive to changes in outcome desirability, whereas habitual behaviour is controlled by stimuli and is less sensitive to the current goal status of the outcome.
77
Based on the text, how is habit strength typically measured in health psychology research?
using self-report measures such as the Frequency x Context measure, the Self-Report Habit Index (SRHI), and the Self-Report Behavioural Automaticity Index (SRBAI).
78
Provide one example from the text of how implementation intentions have been successfully applied in a clinical population to increase adaptive behaviour.
increasing psychotherapy attendance by planning to overcome attendance-related negative affect.
79
what are two personality trait that has been found to negatively predict the effectiveness of implementation intentions?
* socially prescribed perfectionism (preoccupation to reach ideals and standards set by significant others) * impulsivity dimension urgency. (tendency to act impulsively under circumstances when negative affect is experienced)
80
How can implementation intentions enhance cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT), particularly for complex behaviors like addiction or rumination?
by forming clear "if-then" plans that link specific triggers to desirable responses, making behavior change more automatic and reducing reliance on effortful coping strategies. This supports habit formation and can reduce maladaptive responses like rumination or relapse.