Module 6: a transdiagnostic perspective on compulsivity & habit-based interventions Flashcards
1. Module background 1-7, 2. Lecture 8-48, 3. Gardner 2024 49-72, 4. Verhoeven 73-79 (80 cards)
Habit-based interventions aim to promote lasting behavior change, by doing (2)
- buiding desirable habits
- breaking undesired ones
self-report measures of habit (12) / the self-report habit index (SRHI) items, for now just aim to list the 3 broad categories that these items are divided into
Has been used most extensively to study real-life habits
1. I do frequently
2. I do automatically
3. I do without having to consciously remember
4. that makes me feel weird if I do not do it
5. I do without thinking
6. that would require effort not to do it
7. that belongs to my (daily, weekly, monthly) routine
8. I start doing before I realize that I’m doing it
9. I would find hard not to do
10. I have no need to think about doing
11. that is typically me
12. that I have been doing for a long time
categorized into:
1. Repetition
2. Automaticity
3. identity
The Self-Report behavioral automaticity index
4-item subscale from the SRHI consisting of items 2,5,8,10
Implementation intentions are
if-then plans that can help people achieve their goals by specifying critical situations and linking these to the desired behavior
e.g., If I watch television and feel hungry, then I eat fruit
Concrete II’s work better than
goal intentions
e.g., I’m going to eat healthier/do sports/go jogging
According to the ‘instant habit’ theory, II’s work so well because
II’s describe the desired S-R habit or a mental association that is made between the critical cues and the desired behavior
–> this ensures that behavior can be triggered automatically
II’s are also effective because they focus on
critical cues so that every opportunity to carry out the desired behavior is recognized and used.
Compulsivity broad definition
behavior that is continued despite the person being aware of the detrimental consequences
- these can be health-related, social or professional functioning
what is the lecture about?
a transdiagnostic perspective on compulsivity & habit-based interventions
Definition of a transdiagnostic perspective on compulsivity
common psychological/neurobiological processes are thought to underlie behavior that is continued despite explicit knowledge of devastating negative consequences in various disorders
in part 2 of the course, you will look for those transdiagnostic processes including: (3)
- learning processes
– Pos vs neg reinforcement vs punishment
– Pavlovian versus instrumental conditioning - cognitive control processes
- neurobiological processes
Endophenotype
biological or psychological phenomena of a disorder believed to be in the causal chain between genetic contributions to a disorder and diagnosable symptoms of psychopathology
Our course’s transdiagnostic perspective on compulsivity is in line with that of the Research domain criteria institute’s framework which…
considers mental health and psychopathology in the context of major domains of psychological neurobio processes rather than within established diagnostic categories
–> both emphasize interactions between different processes as constituting a disorder
the possible utility of a transdiagnostic perspective
may open up new ways of exploring not only their development, co-morbidity, but most importantly this may provide new targets for prevention and treatment
intention-behavior gap
the phenomenon that people have explicit decisions to change their behavior but fail to take action
- medium-large change in intention -> small-to-medium change in behavior
how does the intention-behavior gap pose a challenge for motivational models
motivational models posit that intention is the main determinant of behavior but the intention-behavior gap goes against that
intention does not always lead to a behavior
examples of motivational models:
* health belief model
* theory of reasoned action
* theory of planned behavior
the intention-behavior gap also points to limitations of what types of interventions
purely information-driven behavior change interventions
(and ofc the motivational model inspired interventions)
Habits can explain the gap between intentions and behavior
As behavior repeatedly takes place, habit increases and becomes a better predictor of behavior than behavioral intentions
- Triandis, 1977
using habits we could study how to effectively change behavior through interventions
Habits general information (3)
A) Almost half of our daily behaviors is performed in the same manner in the same situations
B) Habits allow for efficiency
C) Habits can also be disadvantageous because they make behavior inflexible
Investigating habits in real life can be done in 2 ways
A) field experiments
- Neal’s popcorn experiment
B) Self-report measures
- SRHI: taps into the subjective experience of habit/automaticity
The 4-item self-report behavioral automaticity index of SRHI items, suitable for when?
2) I do automatically
3) I do without having to consciously remember
5) I do without thinking
8) I start doing before I realize I’m doing it
suitable for everyday assessment of automaticity of behavior (its short)
example of an experiment using the SRHI
The role of habits in a snacking experiment + results
Phase 1: habit strength measure (SRHI) and intention regarding snacking (+a power of food questionnaire)
Phase 2 (1 month later): 7-day snack diary
Results: Habit strength was the best predictor of unhealthy snacking
Using questionnaires to track habits: repeated measurement of automaticity across behavioral repetitions shows that
with repetition, automaticity (habits) increases
reinforcement in the role of habit formation + example
short-term reward (or absence of aversive consequences) are also an important determinant of habit formation
e.g., self-reported automaticity of a new habit of flossing was predicted by how pleasurable participants found this behavior to be (fits with the law of effect)
in contrast the perceived health benefits did NOT predict how fast the flossing became a habit