MOG- religious language Flashcards
1
Q
25 mark plan:
is religious language meaningful?
A
intro: flew successfully shows religious language is unfalsifiable but this doesn’t show religious language us meaningless.
Argument against: flews jungle clearing anaology
response: hick eschatological verification
response to hick: god exists is empirically unfalsifiable in this life + we only have empirical evidence to to go on.
response to this: hares blik university lectures example.
conclusion: even if flew shows god exists is unfalsifiable flew doesn’t succeed in showing god exists is meaningless. SO RL is meaningful.
