moral panics Flashcards
1
Q
moral panics
A
- moral panic is a sociological concept that seeks to explain a particular type of overreaction to a perceived social problem
- it’s principal aim was to expose the processes involved in creating concern about a social problem
- the idea of “moral panic” was central to stanley cohen’s research and became a frequently used term which has been used by sociologists to understand the negative portrayal of stereotyped images of “demonised groups”
- it is usually the media who have the power to create a panic or paint a subculture in a negative light
- an important element in this process is the creation of a moral panic - an exaggerated overreaction by society to a perceived problem, this is usually driven or inspired by the media
2
Q
folk devils and moral panics
A
- cohen found that while there were some minor scuffles when the different subcultures met on a bank holiday, the media created a story out of these which turned it into a much more significant phenomenon
- the reaction meant that the police responded to future conflict more forcefully
- other people wanted to join in and have their “five minute of fame”
- the mods and rockets are a good example of how societal reaction to deviance can amplify that deviance
3
Q
strengths of study
A
- his work made it easier to explain how the powerful groups in society can introduce “control legislation” which would probably be rejected under normal circumstances
- the theory is sociologically useful because he explains the development of a panic, he shows how the language used by the media was vastly exaggerated
- cohens theory is useful in explaining how the media are involved in the process, and how they can exert power in society
4
Q
weaknesses of study
A
- in yvonne jewkes’ book, she argues that there are different levels of deviancy that are not accounted for in cohens work
- for example, one cannot compare the moral panic about the use of cannabis to that about child sexual abuse
- morality is not fixed, what might have led to a moral panic in the 70s may be completely different from what causes a moral panic now
- it doesn’t seem to explain what cause the behaviour in the first place, only why people continue to do it