NAT CEN STUDY Flashcards

(23 cards)

1
Q

What was the overall aim of the NatCen study conducted in 2011?

A

To explore what triggered the youth involvement in the August riots of 2011.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many people were interviewed in the NatCen study?

A

36 people in each of the 5 areas studied and 2 unaffected areas.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What event triggered the Tottenham riots on 6 August 2011?

A

A peaceful protest in response to the police handling of the shooting of Mark Duggan.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What types of participants were included in the NatCen study?

A

Young people from mixed age groups, all ethnicities, and varied socio-economic backgrounds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the four types of individuals categorized by researchers involved in the riots?

A

Watchers, Rioters, Looters, Non-involved.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the subcategories of ‘Watchers’ in the NatCen study?

A
  • Bystanders
  • The curious
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the subcategories of ‘Rioters’ identified in the study?

A
  • Protesters
  • Retaliators
  • Thrill-seekers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the subcategories of ‘Looters’ in the NatCen study?

A
  • Opportunists
  • Sellers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the subcategories of ‘Non-involved’ individuals identified?

A
  • Stay-aways
  • Wannabes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What dispositional factors affect decision making in young people?

A
  • Previous criminal activity
  • Attitudes towards authority
  • Prospects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are some ‘nudges’ (facilitators) that influence decision making?

A
  • Easy to get involved
  • Poor job prospects
  • Cynicism towards authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are some ‘tugs’ (inhibitors) affecting decision making?

A
  • Being caught once
  • Positive experience with authority
  • Having a lot to lose
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What situational factors can influence decision making in young people?

A
  • Group processes
  • Peer pressure
  • Information
  • Circumstances
  • Presence of authority figure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are some examples of ‘nudges’ (facilitators) related to situational factors?

A
  • Feeling disinhibited by the group
  • Seeing events on TV
  • Not otherwise occupied
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are some examples of ‘tugs’ (inhibitors) related to situational factors?

A
  • Active future goal thinking
  • Friends not involved
  • Parents disapproving
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What other factors affect decision making in young people?

A
  • Family attitudes
  • Community attachment
  • Sense of belonging
  • Poverty and materialism
17
Q

What are some facilitators (nudges) related to other factors?

A
  • Relatives not disapproving
  • Attachment to a community with low-level criminality
  • Little sense of ownership in society
18
Q

What are some inhibitors (tugs) related to other factors?

A
  • Disapproving relatives
  • Attachment to pro-social communities
  • Adequate resources to purchase desired goods
19
Q

What are the conclusions drawn about anti-social criminal behavior from the study?

A
  • Influenced by collective behavior/group processes
  • Influenced by situational/social factors
  • Influenced by dispositional/individual factors
  • Influenced by beliefs about right and wrong
  • Influenced by assessment of costs and benefits
20
Q

True or False: Participants in the study may give socially desirable responses.

21
Q

What was a criticism regarding the representativeness of the sample?

A

Difficulty in recruiting participants led to reliance on those sent to prison, which may not represent all involved.

22
Q

What issue was noted regarding the reliability of participants’ memories?

A

Participants were interviewed 5 weeks after the event, leading to potential distortion of memories.

23
Q

What bias may have affected the interpretation of the study results?

A

Researchers had to interpret results to fit categories, which may have introduced bias.