negligence Flashcards

1
Q

what needs to be proven to succeed a negligence claim

A

c needs to prove on the balance of probabilities that D owed them a duty of care that they’re in breach of that duty and the damage suffered was caused by the beach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the first stage of negligence?

A

Duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

robinson v ccwy

A

The court can assume a duty exist, if there is existing president or statutory authority covering, stating it does

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

If Robinson does not apply, what will be used?

A

The three part test from caparo v dickman

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what does the caparo test ask

A

whether the damage was reasonably foreseeable as a result of the defendants careless conduct, kent v griffths

whether the defendant is approximate to the claimant due to a relationship be a time and space,
bourhill v young

and finally, whether it is fair, just reasonable to say a duty should exist
hill v cc wy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

kent v griffths

A

Damage was reasonably foreseeable as a result of the defendants, careless conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

bourhill and young

A

whether the defendant is approximate to the claimant due to a relationship or via time and space

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

hill v cc wy

A

Weather is fair just in reasonable to say a duty should exist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

how would it be decided, if there has been a breach in duty?
case

A

their conduct will be compared to the reason
blyth v bww

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are professionals compared to?
and name of test

A

reasonably competent body fellow professionals with that skill
bolam test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are children compared to according to Mullen V. Richards?

A

The recently competent child of the same age and gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Is the test objective or subjective?

A

objective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the factors that Castle consider to see if ex has fallen below the standard?

A

size of the risk bolton v stone
precautions taken lamiter
knowledge of the risk roe v moh
special characteristics paris v stephany
social utility watt v hcc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

it must be decided if the breach was the factual cause of the damage. What is the test for this and what is the case?

A

but for test
barnett v chelsea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

intervening acts
case

A

mckew v holland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

third party

A

knightly v johns

17
Q

natural event case

A

carslogie

18
Q

damage must be reasonably foreseeable. What is the case for this?

A

wagon mound

19
Q

eggshell rule, if the Clarence has any pre-existing conditions that make the most acceptable to harm case

A

smith v leech brain