Negligence Flashcards
(55 cards)
Negligence: Elements
Duty, Breach, Causation (But For + Proximate), Damages
Duty: Steps
Step 1: Is there a duty?
Step 2: What is the standard of care?
Duty: General standard
-Generally, a duty is owed to all people who may reasonably be injured
- There is no liability to unforeseeable P’s
Duty: Affirmative Duty to Act
- If you assume the duty you have to use a duty of reasonable care
- If you place another in danger, you have a reasonable duty
Duty: Authority to Control
If you have authority to control, you have a duty to reasonably control
Duty: Special Relationship
- Common carriers: Upmost Care
- Innkeepers: Reasonable Care
Duty: General Standard of Care
Generally, the standard of a reasonably prudent person under the circumstances
Duty: Standard of Care if Physical Disability
If someone has a physical disability (not mental) they will be measured against others with the same disability to determine the standard of care
Duty: Standard of Care for Drunk People
No different than if they were sober, unless they can show that they did not become drunk voluntarily
Duty: Standard of care for Kids
modified standard, unless the kid was engaged in a specifically dangerous adult activity (like Ricky bobby driving the car)
Duty: Standard of Care for Cardrivers
Reasonable Standard
Duty: Bailor Standard of Care
weird: they must warn of known dangers and if they are the only one receiving the benefit then the standard is lower?
Duty: Standard of Care During Emergencies
Standard of care as specific to the emergency
Duty: Standard of Care to People Coming onto Land: Traditional View
Uses the tripartite scheme
- Invitees (people coming on for economic reasons) - you must inspect, discover, and protect
- licensees (friends) - you must warn of known dangers, but you do not have a duty to inspect
- Trespassers - you have no duty, unless you know of the trespassers, then you have a duty to warn of hidden dangers
Duty: Standard of Care to People Coming onto Land: Modern View
You have a reasonable standard of care to anyone coming onto your land, except to flagrant trespassers (i.e. robbers, people coming to commit a crime). for them, no duty
Breach: Definition for Breach
Generally a violation of the standard of relevant care
this is either going to be the reasonableness standard or the hand formula usually
Breach: Custom Generally
can be admissible, but not dispositive
Breach: Custom for Special Class
For Lawyers, Doctors, Accountants: Custom is admissible and dispositive
Breach: Physicians
Held to a national standard
Breach: Effect of Statutes
Statutes supercede the general standard for breach. If a law imposes a duty, the D violates it, the P is a class protected by the law, harm relates to the law, and the harm violated the statute, then you are guilty
Breach: Excuse of Statutory Breach
You can get out of breach of a statute if you claim that compliance with the statute would have been more dangerous, impossible compared to compliance
Breach: Res Ipsa Loquitur
- Creates an inference of negligence in the case and the case is given to the jury
- means “ the thing that would not have happened unless there was a breach”
- must have been in exclusive control of the D, and P must not have had control
- Med Mal/Products Liability waive the exclusivity requirement; all D’s are jointly liable
But For Causation: Definition
“But For” the negligence, the injury would not have occurred
But For Causation: Exceptions
- Concert of Action: If there are multiple tortfeasors, they are all jointly liable even if “but for” one of their actions there would have been injury
-Multiple Causes: If two negligent acts cause injury, use substantial fact test and ask was the party at issue a substantial factor to the injury
- Alternative Course: If there were two negligent people but only one caused injury and we dont know who, burden shifts to the D’s to prove that they were not negligent.
- Lost Chance: Lost chance of life due to negligence = (percentage of life lost * damages)