Strict Liability and Products Liability Flashcards

(14 cards)

1
Q

Strict Liability: Application

A
  • Abnormally Dangerous Activities

-Animals (both wild and domesticated, sometimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Strict Liability: Abnormally Dangerous Activities

A

-Look to Severity, location, and risk to discern if it is abnormally dangerous

  • The harm has to flow from the risk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Strict Liability: Wild Animals

A
  • Liable for harm from dangerous propensities
  • No liability to trespassers, just invitees/licensees
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Strict Liability: Domesticated Animals

A
  • Dog Bites are usually strict liability
  • Known Dangerous Domestic Animals (If Owners Know it is dangerous)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strict Liability: Trespassing Animals

A
  • Liable for reasonable damages to others land

-unless the animal was a household pet and the owner did not know it was out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Strict Liability: Defenses

A
  • Contributory Negligence: Doesn’t work

-Comparative Negligence: Depends on jurisdiction

-Assumption of Risk: Bars Strict Liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Products Liability: Application

A

Three types of Products Liability

-Normal Negligence
-Strict Products Liability
-Breach of Warranty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Products Liability: Strict Liability Elements

A

Must show

  • The product was defective
  • the defect existed when it left the D’s control
  • P was injured by the defect when using product reasonably
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Products Liability: Types of Strict Liability

A
  • Manufacturing Defect (defective compared to design/specs)
  • Design Defect (consumer expectations test: was it less safe than an ordinary person would expect, Risk Utility Test: Was it a reasonable design and did the risk outweigh the benefits?)

-Failure to Warn (was there a foreseeable risk that was not obvious to the user, and the manufacturer did not take steps to warn)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Products Liability: Who is liable under strict liability ?

A

Any one in the chain of business is liable so long as they were (1) a merchant and (2) the defect existed when they had the thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Products Liability: Damages for Strict Liability

A

Damages for PI or Property; no purely economic damages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Products Liability: Defenses to Strict Liability

A

-Contributory Negligence: Courts Hesitate to apply

-Comparative Negligence: reduces recovery amount

-Assumption of risk

-Substnatial Change in Product: Is a defense, but a seller is still liable for reasonably foreseeable modifications and different uses

  • Compliance with governmental standards: Admissive but not dispositive

-State of the art: if it is the best twe can do, can bar recovery

-waivers: Does not work

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Products Liability: Warranty Types

A
  • Express Warranty: A fact affirmation or promise that is the basis of the bargain

-IWM: Implied warranty that the good is suitable for the ordinary purpose for which it is sold

-IWFPP: Implied warranty that the good is good for the specific purpose when the seller is relying on the sellers expertise for a specific purpose and the seller knows this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Products Liability: Waivers Defenses

A
  • Same as in Contracts (i.e. Conspicuous writing, Oral with Mechantiability, buyer chance to inspect, etc.)

-tort defenses: Contrib./Compar. Neg., Assumption of Risk, Misuse of product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly