Negligence: Defences Flashcards

1
Q

Volenti - D must prove;

(1) C had Full Knowledge of Nature and Extent
(2) C Willingly Accepted the Risk

A

NETTLESHIP v WESTON

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Volenti - Rare for Employers to succeed with this against Employees

A

SMITH v BAKER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Volenti - Rare for this to succeed against Rescuers - Compelled by Moral Instinct

A

HAYNED v HARWOOD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Volenti - Knowledge must be Sufficient

A

DANN v HAMILTON

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Illegality - C involved in an illegal enterprise at the time of the injury

A

PITTS v HUNT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CN - Defendant must prove…

A

C was Careless and Careless Behaviour Contributed to C’s Harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

CN - Courts rarely reduce Employees’ damages

A

CASWELL v POWELL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CN - Child must be Blameworthy

A

GOUGH v THORN

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

CN - Rescuers must have shown a ‘Wholly Unreasonable Disregard for his Own Safety’

A

BAKER v TE HOPKINS & SONS LTD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

CN - Driving - Causal Link

(1) Seatbelts
(2) Crash Helmet
(3) Drunken driver

A

(1) FROOM v BUTCHER
(2) CAPPS v MILLER
(3) OWNES v BRIMMELL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

CN - Dilema Rule - Situations of Imminent Danger - Where C’s response is
(1) Reasonable (2) Unreasonable

A

(1) JONES v BOYCE

(2) SAYERS v HARLOW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly