Trespass To Person Flashcards

1
Q

Assault - Intentional Conduct is Essential

A

LETANG v COOPER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Words, as well as actions, may constitute assault

A

R v IRELAND

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Words may Negate assault

A

TURBERVILLE v SAVAGE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Immediate - Within a minute or so

A

R v IRELAND

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Battery - Intentional - D must only intend his actions not the consequences

A

WILSON v PRINGLE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Direct Application

A

Force must flow almost immediately and without intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Unlawful Force - Generally accepted physical contact in ordinary conduct of everyday life will not be unlawful

A

F v WEST BERKSHIRE HEALTH AUTHORITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Defences - Claimant cannot allege Contributory Negligence as a defence to claims of Assault / Battery

A

COOPERATIVE GROUP v PRITCHARD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Consent - Medical - Consented once been informed of nature of procedure intended

A

CHATTERTON v GERSON

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Consent - Medical - Failure to disclose risks will not invalidate consent

A

CHESTER v AFSHAR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consent - Sport - Within the Rules of the Sport but also conduct outside the rules, but Within Spirt of the Game

A

CONDON v BASI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Defence of the Person

  • Reasonable
  • Proportionate
A

COCKCROFT v SMITH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Defence of Property

- Reasonable steps to eject trespasser

A

GREEN v GODDARD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Necessity

  • Situation existed (emergency)
  • Actions were reasonable
A

F v WEST BERKSHIRE HEALTH AUTHORITY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Rule in WILKINSON v DOWNTON

  • Intention to cause shock
  • C suffers some tangible damage
  • Medically recognised
A

WILKINSON v DOWNTON

WAINWRIGHT v HOME OFFICE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Provocation is not a defence

A

LANE v HOLLOWAY