Neo Weberian Flashcards
(15 cards)
What do Weberian theorists argue about the cause of social inequality?
Weberians argue that social inequality exists due to differences in class, status, and power — not just wealth alone. People with more influence and respect dominate others, reinforcing inequality.
How does Weber’s theory expand on Marxism?
Weber developed Marx’s theory by adding that inequality isn’t just about ownership of wealth, but also about status (social honour/respect) and political power (influence over decision-making and rule creation).
What’s an example of power and status reinforcing inequality?
A religious leader may not be wealthy but holds high status due to moral or spiritual authority. Similarly, people in political roles can influence laws or decisions — reinforcing their power over others in society.
What does this suggest about Weber’s view of society?
Weberians argue society is stratified into hierarchies, where some individuals have more social power than others, making inequality not only economic but also cultural and political.
What is a criticism of Weber’s concept of status?
A limitation is that status is subjective — it’s difficult to measure. Some groups might value wealth, others education or moral character. This makes it hard to compare inequalities or apply Weber’s theory universally.
What do Weber and Pluralists argue about inequality and power?
Weberian and Pluralist theories argue that inequality arises from unequal access to different forms of power — including class, status, and political influence — rather than just economic wealth.
How does Weber develop beyond Marxist class theory?
Unlike Marx’s binary class system, Weber identifies four social classes:
• The propertied class (wealth, status, power)
• The professional class (status, some wealth and power)
• The petit bourgeoisie (small business owners with local respect)
• The working class (low status, income, and power)
What does Weber say about divisions within the working class?
Weber acknowledges that even within the working class, people differ in their access to resources. For example, skilled workers (e.g. plumbers) may command more income and status, while groups like the unskilled, disabled, elderly or young often lack all forms of power.
How does Weber explain discrimination in opportunity?
Weber argued that those in power may restrict access to resources through class, race, or gender bias. For instance, an employer may favour a job applicant who went to the same elite school — showing how power is used to reproduce advantage.
What does this say about society according to Weber?
Weber presents a view of society as fragmented and competitive, where multiple social groups vie for status, wealth, and influence — reinforcing structural inequalities beyond simple class conflict.
What do Weber and Pluralists argue about inequality?
Weber and Pluralists argue inequality comes from differences in class, status, and political power, not just wealth. Power is split across many competing groups.
How does Weber go beyond Marx’s class theory?
Weber says there are four main classes, not just two. The propertied class have wealth and influence. Professionals have status and some power. Small business owners have community respect. The working class have the least power, though some skilled workers may earn more than others.
How does inequality show within the working class?
Some workers, like plumbers, are valued for skills and earn more. Others, like the unskilled or disabled, are stuck at the bottom with no power or job security.
How is opportunity restricted?
Weber says those in power protect their status by hiring people like themselves — e.g. from the same school or background — keeping others out.
What does this mean for society?
Weber sees society as divided and competitive, with groups fighting for status and influence. This structure keeps inequality in place.
