Non-Fatal Offences Flashcards

(28 cards)

1
Q

What is the definition of assault in common law?

A

Assault is defined as intentionally or recklessly causing another person to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the actus reus of assault?

A

Causing the victim to apprehend immediate and unlawful personal violence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does ‘apprehend’ mean in assault?

A

It means the victim anticipates or expects personal violence—not necessarily fear it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can words or silence constitute an assault?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does ‘immediate’ mean in assault?

A

It includes violence that could occur in the near future—not necessarily instantly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the mens rea of assault?

A

Intention or subjective recklessness to cause the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful personal violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the definition of battery in common law?

A

The intentional or reckless application of unlawful force to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the actus reus of battery?

A

Application of unlawful force, which may be:

Direct

Indirect

Omission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What level of force is needed for battery?

A

The merest touching can amount to battery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the mens rea of battery?

A

Intent or recklessness as to the application of unlawful force

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the actus reus of s 47 OAPA 1861?

A

An assault or battery

Which occasions (causes)

Actual bodily harm (ABH)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the mens rea for s 47?

A

Intent or recklessness to commit assault or battery. No mens rea is required for the actual bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is considered ‘actual bodily harm’?

A

Injury that is more than trivial

Loss of consciousness

Cutting hair

Recognised psychiatric injury (not mere emotions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Can s 47 be committed by omission?

A

Yes. If D creates a danger and fails to avert it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the actus reus of s 20 OAPA 1861?

A

Wounding or

Infliction of grievous bodily harm (GBH)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the definition of ‘wound’?

A

A wound requires a break in both layers of the skin

17
Q

What is meant by ‘inflict’ in s 20?

A

‘Inflict’ means to cause, and does not require an assault

18
Q

What is grievous bodily harm (GBH)?

A

Really serious harm

Includes psychological harm

Age and vulnerability of victim considered

19
Q

What is the mens rea of s 20?

A

D must intend or be reckless as to causing some harm

No need to foresee or intend serious harm.

20
Q

What is the actus reus of s 18 OAPA 1861?

A

Wounding or

Causing GBH

(The same definitions as under s 20 apply)

21
Q

What is the mens rea of s 18?

A

D must intend to cause GBH.

Intention to wound is not enough

Must be direct or oblique intent

22
Q

Can s 18 be committed recklessly?

A

No. s 18 is a specific intent offence—recklessness is insufficient.

23
Q

What are examples of injuries for s 47 ABH?

A

Minor fractures

Loss of consciousness

Hair cutting

Recognised psychiatric illness (more than distress)

24
Q

What are examples of injuries for s 20 or s 18 GBH/wounding?

A

Broken bones

Fractured skull

Substantial blood loss

Permanent disability or sensory loss

Breaking both skin layers (wound)

25
What are the two types of causation required in criminal law?
Factual causation: “But for” test – R v White Legal causation: Operating and substantial cause
26
What can break the chain of causation?
A novus actus interveniens, such as: Unreasonable medical negligence Acts of third parties Victim’s own act (if unforeseeable) Natural events (only if extraordinary)
27
What is the general rule for omissions in criminal liability?
No liability unless D was under a legal duty to act
28
When is there a duty to act (omissions)?
Statutory duty Special relationship (e.g. parent-child) Voluntary assumption of care Contractual duty D creates a dangerous situation