NUTR 3210 Flashcards

1
Q

Iron, folate, vitamin B12 deficiency

A

Anemia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Vitamin D deficiency

A

rickets, defective bone growth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Thiamine (Vitamin B1)

A

beriberi, energy production, abnormalities in nervous sytem

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Vitamin C deficiency

A

scurvy, iron absorption, haemorrhaging

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cl- metabloite

A

electrolyte

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

I-

A

thyroid homrones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Fl-

A

dentine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Br-

A

ECM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

estimated average requirement

A

connentration of nutrient to satisfy 50% of the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

recommended dietary allowance

A

concentration of nutirent required to satisfy the needs of the 97.5% of the population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

hypoatremia

A

metabloic condition in whcih there is not enough sodium in extracellular fluid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

proximate analysis - moisture

A

weight food sample then dry at 105 degrees or freeze dry,
% dry matter = dry/wet x100

errors: over estimates moisture, drying method removes volatile compounds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

proximate analysis - crude fat

A

extract with ether, analyze with gas chromotography
% crude fat= weight of fat/ wet or dry weight x100%

errors: poor extraction of P.L unwanted extraction of cholophyl, carotenoids and waxes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

proximate analysis - mineral content

A

ignite residue,
% ash = weight of ash/ wet or dry weight
errors: loss of volatile minerals (iron, copper, zinc), no info about individual minerals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

proximate analysis- crude protien

A

kjeldal analysis 1. digestion by sulferic acid into N and amonia 2. distilliation - separating the amonia 3. tiration - quantify the amonia with standard

% crude protein = N in smaple x conversion factor/ wet or dry weight x100%

100% protein/ % N = conversion factor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

rproximate analysis- crude fibre

A
  1. extract with ether, boil in acid 2. boil in alaki (small intestine) 3. ignite ash + crude fibre 4. get crude fibre by subtracting amoutn of ash

% crude fiber= (wt of ash + crude fiber) - wt of ash / dry or wet sample x100%

errors: over estimates fiber -> loss of soluble fiber, dosen’t give fermentation potenital

17
Q

crude fiber vs. dietary fiber

A

crude - lignin and cellulose

dietary - cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, gums, lignin

18
Q

proximate analysis - nitrogen free extract

A

% NFE = 100% - (%moisture- %crude fat -%ash - %crude protein - %crude fibre)

errors: accumulates errors, deosn’t differentiate between sugars

19
Q

van soest method

A

alternative to NFE, agriculture use, can differentaite between cellulose hemi- and lignin

20
Q

southgate method

A

more for human use, provides quantification of sugars, starch, fiber (total)

21
Q

total collection method

A

adapt to diet for 7-21 days, measure intake for 3-10 days, measure and wight feces and analyze for nutrient

apparent digestibility coefficiet = totoal intake- total feces/ total intake

limitations: accuracy, labour intensive, costly not ideal for wild animals

22
Q

indicator method

A

requires a marker internal and external

apparent digestbility coefficient = (nutirent/marker in feed) - (nutrietn/ marker in feces) / nutirent / marker in feed

advantages: less labour intensive, small sample, wild animals

23
Q

true digesability

A

swtich to a 0 nutreitn diet, analyze until previous diet is cleared

true digestibility coeffecient = (nutrient/marker in feed) - (nutirent/feces - nutrient/feces after 0 nutirent diet) / (nutrient/marker in feed

24
Q

gross energy, digesable energy, metablizable energy, net energy

A

gross energy: max amount, heat of combustion

digestiable energy: gross energy x apparent digestibility
fat - 95%, protein 92%, CHO 97%

metabloic energy: GE x apparent digestability, (same as DE), protein 1.25 kcal/g loss in urine

net energy: ME- heat increment of food

25
basal metabloic
kcal/24 hours, realtes to lean mass (bone, muscle, organs) BMR = A x M^0.75 A- metabolically active tissue M- body weight in kg
26
physical activity energy expenditure
seditary 1.2 mad 1.55 extra active 1.9
27
measuring totoal energy expenditure - indirect
measure O2, CO2, urinary N loss RQ= Co2 produced/ O2 used need to measure protein component carb RQ= 1 fat RQ= 0.8 proetin RQ= 0.82
28
fisher projection to haworth
left up, right down
29
3 forms of glucose
linear, alpha (1/3, beta (2/3)
30
sucrose
glucose alpha 1- 2 beta fructose | non reducing
31
lactose
galatose b1-4 glucose (alpha or beta) | reducing
32
maltose
glucose alpha 1-4 glucose (alpha or beta) | reducing
33
cellulose
dietary and functional beta 1,4 glucose units poorly fermented by bacteria bran legumes, nute, peas
34
hemi cellulose
alpha or beta pentoses and hexoses solubility depends on sugar comp bran, whole grains
35
pectin
dietary and functionality backbone of unbranched alpha-1,4 F galaturonic acid hihgly fermented rich in fruits
36
fully resistant starch
non digested by humans, resistant to amylase activity
37
brush boarder enzymes
sucrase (invertase), isomaltase (alpha-dexinase), lactase, maltase
38
absoprtion of fructose and glucose
fructose- GLUT5, GLUT2, easy to move through blood since very low conentration glucose and galatose- SGLT1-GLUT2, harder to move glucose due to 6mM concentration, early in S.I some glucose by facilitated diffusion