Option 1 : human relationships studies Flashcards
(61 cards)
study for a cognitive explanation for the formation of relationships
Markey and Markey 2007
study for a socio-cultural explanation for the formation of relationships
Buss 1989
2 studies for the role of communication in relationships
Bradbury and Fincham 1992
John Gottman 1986
2 studies for why relationships change or end
Bradbury and Fincham 1992
John Gottman 1986
2 studies for research methods into personal relationships
Bradbury and Fincham 1992
John Gottman 1986
2 studies for ethical considerations into personal relationships
John Gottman 1986
Saxton 2008
2 studies for Cooperation and competition
tajfel 1971
Sherif 1954
2 studies for Prejudice and discrimination (biological and cognitive)
Fein and Spencer 1997
Harris and Fisk 2006
2 studies for Conflict and resolution
Paluck 2009
Sherif 1954
2 studies for research methods into group dynamics
tajfel 1971
Sherif 1954
2 studies for ethical considerations into group dynamics
tajfel 1971
Sherif 1954
Buss aim
- test three evolution-based assumptions about human mate selection:
- As men are searching for women with high reproductive value, they will favour youth and physical appearance
- As women are searching for men who will invest in their offspring, they will favour a man with the resources he can provide
- As men do not want to invest in another man’s child, chastity will be highly valued
test parental investment theory
Buss sample
- 37 samples from 33 countries
- 10 047 participants
- Mean age 23
- Different sampling techniques for different countries
Buss method
- 2 surveys taken
- Questions such as ideal age gap, number of children desired etc then rate 18 characteristics
- Next rank 13 characteristics
- Everything back translated
Buss results
- 36/37 samples women liked financial prospects more than men
- All men valued youth and attractiveness
- Most women like men to be older
- 34/37 men cared more about appearance than women
- 23/37 valued chastity
Buss conclusion
- Generally support the three assumptions
- Not so much the chastity one but that could be more of a cultural then evolutionary factor and is not easily observed
Buss strengths
- Takes lots of nationalities and cultures into account but not representative of the whole population as rural, less educated and poorer regions underrepresented
-Back translated
Buss limitations
- Construct validity and western bias eg. places where couples live together but aren’t married and places with multiple wives
- Cannot say why the preferences exist, could be evolutionary, cultural, genetic differences etc
- Temporal validity
- Just because someone is from somewhere doesn’t mean they have the same values
Markey and Markey aim
Test similarity attraction model
Markey and Markey sample
212 volunteers
Markey and Markey method
- Questionnaire on their values, beliefs, priorities etc
- Also about their dream partner without thinking of anyone in particular
Markey and Markey results
- People attracted to people who are more similar to them
- Follow up of 106 straight couples who had been together for at least a year confirmed this
- Most harmonious relationships when they were most similar
Markey and Markey limitations
-Not generalisable sample
- Self Reported data = demand characteristics
- No cause and effect relationship
Bradbury and Fincham aim
Determine the role of communication in relationships