OR Qs Flashcards

1
Q

Interpret the above OR with the 95% CI

A

(OR Interpretation): Odds Ratio (OR) = (Odds of exposure in cases) /(Odds of exposure in controls) = (a/c) / (b/d) = ad / bc.
Interpretation: Children from the estate sector have 4.3 times the odds ofbeing undernourished compared to children from the rural sector. The95% Condence Interval (CI) is 3.2 - 5.7. Since the CI does not include 1.0,this association is statistically signicant at the p<0.05 level. Being fromthe estate sector appears

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Advantages/Disadvantages of Case-Control

A

Advantages: Ecient for studying rare outcomes (if undernutrition wasrare), relatively quick and inexpensive, can study multiple exposures/riskfactors simultaneously, requires smaller sample size than cohort studies,good for diseases with long latency. (Com Med Notes, pg 63)
Disadvantages: Prone to selection bias (choice of cases/controls), prone■ to information bias (recall bias regarding exposures), cannot calculateincidence or RR directly, temporal relationship between exposure andoutcome can be dicult to establish, not suitable for rare exposures.(Com Med Notes, pg 64)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Risk factors for colon cancer:■ Study Design

A

Case-Control Study. Colon cancer can have a longlatency and may not be extremely common, making case-control ecient.Recruit colon cancer patients (cases) and controls, compare pastexposures (diet, family history, etc.). Alternatively, a Cohort Study(especially retrospective using existing records if available) could be usedbut would be more resource-intensive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the first criterion for instituting a screening program?

A

The disease should be an important public health problem with high prevalence/incidence and serious consequences. It must have a recognizable latent or early symptomatic stage, and its natural history should be adequately understood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the second criterion for instituting a screening program?

A

A suitable screening test must be available that is safe, acceptable to the population, accurate (valid with good sensitivity and specificity), reliable, and relatively inexpensive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the third criterion for instituting a screening program?

A

Effective and acceptable treatment must be available for individuals identified with the disease in its early stage, leading to better outcomes than later treatment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the fourth criterion for instituting a screening program?

A

Facilities for diagnosis and treatment must be available, and the cost of case-finding should be economically balanced in relation to medical care as a whole.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What should case-finding be considered in the context of a screening program?

A

Case-finding should be a continuous process, not a one-off project, with benefits outweighing the risks (physical, psychological, financial). There should be an agreed policy on whom to treat as patients.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the RCT?

A

RCT stands for Randomized Controlled Trial, which is considered the gold standard for interventions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the advantages of RCTs?

A

RCTs minimize bias and confounding through randomization and blinding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the disadvantages of RCTs?

A

RCTs can be expensive, face ethical constraints, and may lack generalizability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Endemic?

A

The constant presence of a disease or infectious agent within a given geographic area or population group; may also refer to the usual prevalence of a given disease within such area or group. Baseline level.

(e.g., Malaria was endemic in parts of SL)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Epidemic?

A

The occurrence in a community or region of cases of an illness, specific health-related behaviour, or other health-related events clearly in excess of normal expectancy. A sudden increase above baseline.

(e.g., Dengue epidemics in SL)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Selection Bias?

A

Selection Bias occurs when cases or controls are not representative of the general population.

Examples include selecting cases only from one major cancer hospital (Maharagama) or selecting controls from a different surgical ward (NHSL).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Referral Bias?

A

Referral Bias is a type of selection bias where cases are selected from a specific location that may not represent the broader population.

Example: Selecting cases only from Maharagama may not represent all breast cancer patients.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Berksonian Bias?

A

Berksonian Bias occurs when hospital-based controls differ systematically from the source population.

Example: Controls from a surgical ward may differ from the general population.

17
Q

What is Information Bias?

A

Information Bias occurs when there are inaccuracies in the data collected about exposure or outcome.

Types include Recall Bias and Interviewer Bias.

18
Q

What is Recall Bias?

A

Recall Bias is when cases recall past weight or lifestyle factors differently than controls.

Example: Breast cancer patients may remember their past differently than non-cases.

19
Q

What is Interviewer Bias?

A

Interviewer Bias occurs when interviewers probe exposure history differently based on their knowledge of case/control status.

This can lead to skewed data collection.

20
Q

What is Confounding Bias?

A

Confounding Bias occurs when extraneous factors are associated with both the exposure and outcome, affecting the results.

Examples include age, parity, and lifestyle factors.

21
Q

Conducting a Cohort Study (on factory workers, e.g., exposure to a chemicaland asthma(33pg epid myanswers))

A

1.Define Cohorts: Select a group of workers exposed to the factor of interest (e.g., the chemical) and a comparable group of workers not exposed to the factor. Both groups must be free of the outcome (asthma) at the start of the study. 2. Baseline Data: Collect baseline information on exposure levels, potential confounders (e.g. smoking, age, pre-s existing conditions), and confirm absence of the outcome. 3. Follow-up: Follow both the exposed and unexposed cohorts over a specified period (prospectively). The follow-up methods could include periodic health examinations, questionnaires, or checking medical r records. Ensure follow-up SS consistent for both groups. 4. Outcome Ascertainment: Monitor the development of the outcome (asthma) in both groups using standardized diagnostic criteria. 5. Analysis: Compare the incidence of the outcome (asthma) in the exposed group with the incidence in the unexposed group. Measures (Rates) Calculable from a Cohort Study: ◦ Incidence Rate (or Cumulative Incidence) in Exposed Group (le): (Number of new asthma cases in exposed) / (Total person-time at risk in exposed OR Total number initially disease-free in exposed). Iincidence Rate (or Cumulative Incidence) in Unexposed Group (lu): (Number of new asthma cases in unexposed) / (Total person-time at risk in unexposed OR Total number initially disease-free in unexposed). 9 Relative Risk (RR):le /lu. Measures the strength of association between exposure and outcome. Attributable Risk (AR) / Risk Difference: le - lu. Measures the excess risk of the outcome in the exposed group attributable to the exposure,
Atributable Fraction (AF) / Attributable Proportion: (le-lu)/ le * -100%. The proportion of the disease in the exposed group that is attributable to the exposure. Population Attributable Risk (PAR): It (ncidence in total population) jU- Measures the excess risk in the total population attributable to the exposure.
2/4

22
Q
  1. Recall Bias
A

Use blinded, structured questionnaires with neutral language
Keep recal period short whenever possible.

23
Q

Selection Bias

A

Use multiple control groups to assess consistency of results

24
Q

Interviewer/Observer Bias

A

Blind the interviewer to case/control status.
Use standardized questionnaires

25
Describe how you would conduct an epidemiological study to find thecause for cough and difficulty in breathing in the adults living in this area.
34pg
26
A group of researchers were interested in testing a new vaccine to preventmeasles in infants in SriLanka. They planned to conduct a randomizedcontrol trial for this. The intervention group will receive the new vaccine. Theresearchers considered the options of giving no vaccine, giving a placebo, orgiving the existing Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine to the control group.Describe briefly giving reasons which of the options is preferred for thecontrolgroup.
Best Option: Existing MMR vaccine Reason: It is unethical to withhold a proven vaccine when one already exists. Using the existing MMR vaccine helps compare the effectiveness of the new vaccine—whether it's better, similar, or not worse than the current one. A placebo or no vaccine can only be used if no effective vaccine is available
27
In analyzing the risk factors, the researcher obtained the following results:OR 6.0 (95% CI-5.38-6.69).Interpret the OR with the CI. (30 marks)
An OR of 6.0 means that the odds of havingdiabetes are 6 times higher among those with low physical activity comparedto those with moderate/high activity. The 95% CI (5.38-6.69) does not include1.0, indicating that the association is statistically signicant (p < 0.05). Theresult suggests low physical activity is a signicant risk factor for diabetes inthis study population.
28
1.1.3 To determine the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Sri Lanka Most Appropriate Study Design: Cross-Sectional Study,explain
Explanation: A cross-sectional study is best for determining the prevalence of a condition at a specific point in time. In this design, a representative sample of participants from Sri Lanka is assessed for the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus. It provides a "snapshot" of the frequency of diabetes in the population, making it suitable for prevalence studies.
29
Reasons for Selecting Newly Diagnosed Pancreatic Carcinoma Patients as Cases
Minimize recall bias Reduce survival bias Consistent case definition (Improves study validity) Ensure temporality (it is essential to ensure that the exposure occurred before the outcome ) Generalizability(Results apply to current population)
30
Explain with an example the reason for collecting many variables for pancreatic carcinoma even though the main risk factor under study is smoking (30 marks)
To identify and control forconfounding factors. Even if smoking is the main factor of interest, othervariables (e.g., age, diet, alcohol use, occupational exposures) might beassociated with both smoking and pancreatic cancer, potentially distorting thetrue association between smoking and the disease. Collecting data on theseallows for adjustment during analysis (e.g., stratication, multivariate analysis).