Organisation and Information Management Flashcards
(70 cards)
Definition: organisation (by Pride - not preferred by Baisch)
a group of two or more people working together to achieve a common set of goals
Definition: organisation (by Jones - preferred by Baisch
a tool used by people to coordinate their actions to obtain something they desire or value – that is, to achieve their goals. People who value security create an organisation called a police force, an army, or a bank.
Why do we organise?
- Increase quality – by specialisation
- Reduce cost – by reducing transaction costs and by generating economies of scale
- Prevent fraud – by better control of power (compliance)
- Increase speed – by faster processes
- d
Explain the organisational principle of congruence
The following should be congruent:
- Task / job
- Responsibility
- Power/authority
Avoid:
- Suicide squad: high task/job, high responsibility, low power
- Land of milk and honey: high task/job, high power, low responsibility
- Jumping Jack Director: High power/authority, low task, low responsibility
- d
What defines a job/task
FOPMTL
- Function – what to do?
- Object – on what do we work?
- Person – who does it?
- Means, tools – with what?
- Time – when?
- Location – where?
What are the two kinds of competencies needed to fulfil a task?
Operational competence
Leaders competence
What is operational competence?
PAAD
- permission to do something
- being available (Verfügungskompetenz)
- to ask for
- to decide
What is leaders competence
Authority to:
- give directives
- set compliance rules
- monitor and check
- d
Define Responsibility
RACI Method:
Responsible – for the doing
Accountable – for getting the permission
Consulted – to be involved
Informed – to hand over information
Two concepts:
- Own up to your actions – I did it
- Take responsibility for the consequences
Definition: functional structure (organisational structure)
DBEER
A design that groups people together on the basis of their common expertise and experience or because they use the same resources.
E.g. CEO
Then: materials management, manufacturing, sales and marketing
Functional structure:
Where is this typical?
What are it’s characteristics
Where typical: small to medium sized business
Characteristics
- Based on scope of one’s duties. Focus on competence and performance
- One-line design – only 1 boss for everybody.
From where does the functional structure of an organisation derive?
Oldest organisational design in industry: derives from the split in technical or commercial focus of the founders of a company.
6 Advantages of a functional structure
TOSCRS PL
- CEO in touch with all operations (good information transparency)
- Simplifies control mechanisms
- Clear definition of responsibilities (due to 1-line structure)
- Specialists at senior and middle management levels (deliver high quality because they are experts in their field)
- High productivity in each single function (but overall customer to customer…not?)
- Deep learning for skills might form core competencies
Functional structure:
6 Disadvantages
Don’ scam
- Difficult to cope with diversity (especially product / market diversity)
- Senior managers overburdened with routine matters => bottle necks
- Senior managers neglect strategic issues (too far away from markets)
- Coordination between functions difficult (many interfaces in order fulfilment – slow cycle times)
- Failure to adapt (no market drive in most of the functions)
- Difficult to measure the contribution to company’s overall profitability
Divisional structure: what is this
Head office (central services to the side) Then: Division 1, 2, 3...(like companies within a company, e.g. Daimler trucks)
Divisional structure:
Where
Characteristics
History
Where: big, diversified companies
Characteristics:
- One-line design: 1 boss for everybody
- Focus on products and markets/customers
History: 2nd half of 20th century
Divisional structure:
Advantages
FCCSSD
- High flexibility (good for M and As): invest or de-invest in product groups = divisions.
- Better control by unit’s performance for each unit possible: like a company with margin/profit line: Profit Centres
- Better contribution to company strategy (through market contact, sees customer and competitor perspectives)
- Specialisation in products helps to develop core competencies
- Development of division managers: so able to manage whole company if promoted.
Divisional structure:
Disadvantages
ErEcsEcELs
- Expensive redundancy in resources that are installed in each division (HR, Mgmt team, purchasing…)
- Expensive central services to coordinate the divisional functions (e.g. finding synergies…)
- Expensive Bureaucratic cost and transaction cost
- Egoism of the divisions or the attempt of the central services to dominate the decisions may paralyse the organisation.
- Losing synergies in…purchasing, HR…
Matrix structure: what is it
Line 1: CEO
Line 2: Functional structures: VP Purchasing, VP Manufacturing, VP Sales and marketing
Other side of level 3, to the left of the line structure: Product managers, Divisions, Process managers, Project managers…
E.g. Daimler is multi-dimensional
Matrix structure: Focus
Object and performance
Matrix structure: Advantages
CEFICQIK
- Reduce functional barriers by communication between functions, stimulated by product managers
- Overcome egoism in divisions
- Make the (high-tech) organisation more flexible and able to respond quickly
- Improve cost and quality at the same time (functions for high quality, product managers for speed and cost)
- Integrate knowledge: the two lines and teams are more open to learning
Matrix structure: Disadvantages
Suc-Fruc
- The decisions become slow (discussion between 2 dimensions)
- Unclear job and task responsibilities (e.g. finding synergies…)
- High degree of conflicts, high transaction costs
- Cost and resource allocation becomes fuzzy
- Lack of rules and Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) leads to uncertainty
- Tendency to more centralisation to get more authority and control.
Agency theory history
1973, Ross ‘Theory of Agency’
Agency theory assumptions
- Individuals maximise their personal benefit
- Information asymmetry between principal and agent; agent generally knows more in their area of expertise (so inflate the costs, don’t pass on bad performance information…)
• Different interests
/ incentives / preferences: conflict in objectives; profit v maintain collegiate relationships, finish early…
• Assume people are naturally bad: malice, fraud, opportunistic behaviour.