orphan studies+ influence of early attachment Flashcards

(18 cards)

1
Q

institutionalisation

A

effects of living in an institutionalised setting eg. hospital/orphanage for long periods of time
very little emotional care in these places
thought that living in such settings affects child’s ability to form normal attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Rutter’s ERA study

A

aim of ERA was to investigate extent to which good care could make up for poor early experiences in institutions
study involves 165 Romanian children who spent their childhood years in Romanian orphanages
111 of these orphans were adopted before the age of two
54 of the orphans were adopted by the age of four
Each adoptee assessed at regular intervals to determine physical, social and cognitive development
- group of 52 kids adopted from same time in UK are control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Rutter findings

A

mean IQ for those adopted before 6 months was 102 vs 86 for those adopted between 6 months + 2 years, and 77 for those adopted after 2 years
those adopted after 6 months had disinhibited attachment. symptoms include attention seeking, clinginess and social behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

additional study: Zeanah et al 2005

A

looked at attachment in 95 children aged 12-31 months that spent most of their life in an institution
65% had disorganised attachment (resistant + avoidant)
only 19% had secure attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

effects of institutionalisation
1. disinhibited attachment

A

equally friendly towards people they know and people they have just met
highly unusual beh - most young ppl show stranger anx
caused by living w multiple caregivers during critical period - in orphanage up to 50 careworkers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

effects of institutionalisation
2. intellectual disability

A
  • in Rutter’s study most showed signs of this when arrived in UK
  • but, most children adopted before 6 months had caught up by age 4
  • intellectual development damaged by institutionalisation - but can be reversed by certain age
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

strength of romanian orphan studies
helped understanding of effects of institutionalisation

A

E: led to improvement in way children are cared for in institutions. Children’s homes now avoid having large nums of children being cared for by 1 staff (increased saff:kids ratio). introduced keyworker - 1 person plays central role in child’s care
C: improves the child’s QOL as more kids can develop secure attachments. prevents neglection of child

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

limitation of romanian orphan studies
Rutter - omanian orphan studies are rare

A

E: conditions found in these orphanages were very poor and not typical of what is found in UK
C: can’t generalise findings so they may not tell us about effects of institutionalisation in everyday life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

limitation of romanian orphan studies
Rutter only studied children up to age 25

A

P: little adult related data
E: so there was limited info gathered on how these children developed past age 25, so long term affects of institutionalisation are unclear
C: no clear evidence to suggest whether effects of institutionalisation are long or short term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

internal working model

A

the mental representations that we carry with us of our attachment to our primary caregiver. These affect our future relationships as they form our perceptions of what relationships are like.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

relationships in later childhood

A
  • secure attachment - form best quality childhood friendships
    bullying - secure less likely to be involved. Insecure resistant - bullied
    Insecure avoidant- bully
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

relationships in adulthood
Hazan + Shaver

A

they studied effects of attachment type on later romantic relationships
- analysed 620 responses to ‘love quiz’
- assessed their current relationship, general love experiences and attachment type

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Hazan + Shaver findings

A

56% were securely attached - had good relationships
25% were insecure avoidant - high jealousy + fear of intimacy
19% were insecure resistant - more issues maintaining relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

relationships in adulthood as a parent

A
  • internal working models impact on how we raise our children - generational
  • Bailey et al assessed attachments of 99 mothers to their babies and their own mothers
  • mother-baby attachment assessed using strange situation. Mother-mother attachment assessed via interviews
  • found that women had same attachment style to their babies + their own mothers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

strength of influence on later attachments
questionnaires/ interviews

A

P: most studies that focus on how attachment forms in later life are gathered via interviews / questionnaires
E: answers likely to be true + genuine - no need to lie as not face to face.
C: results more valid as questionnaires are anonymous.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

limitation of influence on later attachments
questionnaires / interviews

A

E: requires person to have lots of knowledge on their early childhood to assess their quality of attachment. Info could be incorrect as may not be fully remembered
C: issues with validity

17
Q

limitation of influence on later attachments
internal working models

A

P: focuses on importance of internal working models in predicting future rels
E: fails to consider other factors that could affect future relationships eg. bad experiences (bullying)
C: limits understanding of influences on future rels. States we don’t have control over our own relationships - deterministic

18
Q

strength of of influence on later attachments
support

A

P: support from Hazan + Shaver
E: ‘love quiz’. 56% had secure attachments and relationships were good. 25% were insecure avoidant + had high levels of jealousy.
C: Suggests our early attachment influences quality of our later relationships