Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

AUD > Other Professional Services > Flashcards

Other Professional Services Flashcards

(82 cards)

Start Studying
1
Q

What is the most authoritative source of guidance for compilation and review engagements for nonissuers?

A

Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARS)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Under what circumstances should interim reviews be performed according to GAAS rather than SSARS?

A

(1) The entity’s most recent financials have been audited
(2) The CPA expects to audit the current-year financials
(3) The same reporting framework is used for both annual financials and interim financial info

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why are certain interim reviews performed according to GAAS rather than SSARS?

A

Because, in the right circumstances, such interim reviews are basically extensions of the annual audit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What standard is generally below SSARS in authority?

A

Interpretive publications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Are accountants required to follow interpretive publications?

A

No, they are recommended but not required

Accountants departing from interpretive publications must justify it, however

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who all is included under the heading of “third parties”?

A

Everyone besides management – including those charged with governance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is a compilation?

A

Helping management to present financial data without providing assurance on the statements themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a review?

A

Gathering evidence to provide limited assurance that financial statements need no material changes to comply with a reporting framework

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Does an accountant need to be independent to perform a compilation or a review?

A

Not for a compilation, but independence is necessary for a review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What do audits have that compilations and reviews typically don’t?

A

Testing of:

(1) internal control
(2) fraud risk
(3) accounting records
(4) source documents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

If an accountant compiles financial statements that are not expected to be used by a third party, what is not required?

A

A report on the compilation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the typical structure for a compilation report?

A

(1) Introductory paragraph
(2) Paragraph for management’s responsibilities
(3) Paragraph for accountant’s responsibilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What should compiled financial statements include on each page?

A

A reference to the compilation report (e.g. “See Compilation Report”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If the accountant does something unusual per request (such as leaving out all disclosures), what should he say in the report?

A

There should be an explanatory paragraph after the paragraph outlining his responsibilities explaining the unusual activity

Purpose is not to be misleading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

If the accountant doing a compilation is not independent, how should this be mentioned in the report?

A

As a final paragraph

If reasons for impairment are disclosed (though it’s not required), ALL reasons must be disclosed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In a compilation report, how should the accountant report any material departures from the reporting framework?

A

If the report can be modified to cover all the material departures, then it should be, but if it cannot (because the departures are so extensive), then the accountant should withdraw from the engagement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

If a compilation report is a restricted use report, how should this be mentioned in the report?

A

A paragraph should be added at the end to state that it is restricted, to identify the parties, and to explain that outside parties should not use it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

If an engagement is changed from an audit or review to a compilation, what would be a problematic reason for the change?

A

A change in scope (e.g. the accountant is forbidden from contacting the client’s attorney)

In the case of an attorney, the change in scope is severe, but otherwise a change to compilation is permissible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

If there is a change of engagement to a compilation, what should the compilation report not mention?

A

(1) Original engagement
(2) Audit or review procedures performed
(3) Scope limitations that changed the engagement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

If an accountant is doing a review of an entity’s financial statements, what should he obtain from management?

A

Representations for all financial statements and periods covered by the review report

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is important to know about review reports?

A

They are very similar to compilation reports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the typical structure for a review report?

A

(1) Introductory paragraph
(2) Paragraph for management’s responsibilities
(3) Paragraph for accountant’s responsibilities
(4) Paragraph for review results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

If an accountant conducts a review, what should the reviewed financial statements include on each page?

A

A reference to the review report (e.g. “See Review Report”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Is an accountant permitted to issue a review on only one financial statement?

A

Yes, so long as there is not a scope restriction on his inquiries and procedures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
If financial statements need to be prepared in a "prescribed form," what counts as a prescribed form?
Any standard (and preprinted) form adopted by the body receiving the report, usually gov't or regulatory bodies Does not count as a prescribed form if the entity itself has adopted a particular form
26
What happens if a prescribed form deviates from the reporting framework for a compilation?
It is not a problem, since the body prescribing the form has a reason for it -- however, it should be a restricted use form
27
If a compilation shows that the entity deviates from the prescribed form, what should the accountant do?
Follow the SSARS guidance for an ordinary deviation from the reporting framework
28
Under what circumstances can an accountant be exempt from SSARS when submitting personal financial statements to a client?
If the statements will solely be used to fulfill the client's personal goals (rather than, e.g., to obtain credit) If exempt, the accountant should submit a written report stating that the statements were not audited, reviewed, or compiled
29
Is a successor for a review or compilation required to communicate with a predecessor?
No, though it is recommended in various situations (e.g. if there were frequent changes in accountants)
30
What is the difference between successor-predecessor communications for an audit and for a review/compilation?
For the latter, SSARS includes an inquiry about management's cooperation in providing info, but does not include anything about internal controls (since reviews and compilations don't assess internal controls)
31
If an accountant performs a compilation on specific items (rather than whole financial statements), does he need to write a report?
No, though it would be prudent to dispel any risk that his name might give to the assurance he provides on the info
32
How does a report for a compilation on particular financial items compare to one on whole financial statements?
They are essentially the same, except that the report will mention "items" or "schedule of the items" rather than "financial statements"
33
What should an accountant do if he is compiling pro forma financial info for a client?
Follow the specific guidance on it (AR 120), unless it is presented as supplementary information, in which case he should follow that guidance (AR 80)
34
What is pro forma financial information?
Financial information that reflects what historical records would have been if some event had occurred (e.g. a business combination)
35
How should pro forma financial information be presented?
It should be distinguished from actual historical information with some label (e.g. "pro forma")
36
What must be included with compiled pro forma financial information?
(1) Actual historical financial statements -- which must have been audited, reviewed, or compiled (2) Report on the historical financial statements
37
Does an accountant need to write a report for pro forma financial information?
No, and the guidance here is the same as for compiled financial statements -- it might still be prudent to write a report rather than have his name be associated with the statements without any description
38
If an accountant is reporting on comparative financial statements, how will his report differ?
It will generally be the same as for compilation/review reports on financial statements for one period
39
If an accountant reporting on comparative statements reissues his previous-year report, how should it be dated?
If reissued without modification, it should have the same date, but if with modification, it should be dual-dated
40
If comparative financial statements for one period but not another omit "substantially all" disclosures, can the accountant still report on those comparative statements?
No, since such statements would not be comparable All statements being compared should have the same level of disclosure (or of disclosure-omission)
41
When reporting on comparative statements, what should a continuing accountant do if he has an equal or higher level of service done on the current period than on the prior one?
He should simply update the prior period report
42
When reporting on comparative statements, what should a continuing accountant do if he has a lower level of service done on the current period than on the prior one?
He should either - describe his responsibility for the statements in a separate paragraph in the report - reissue the prior-period report along with the current one (they can be combined or separate)
43
When reporting on comparative statements, what should a continuing accountant do for a changed reference to a deviation from the reporting framework on the prior period statements?
Report should have an explanatory paragraph with (1) the date of the previous report, (2) why the reference was changed, and (3) that the prior statements have been changed
44
Are predecessors permitted to reissue compilations or reviews if requested?
Yes, though not required
45
When reporting on comparative statements, what can a successor do if the predecessor does not reissue prior statements?
(1) Perform the compilation/review/audit himself | (2) Add a reference in the report to the predecessor's report with a disclaimer
46
What should an accountant do if he is compiling or reviewing current period statements when the prior-period statements were audited?
Either (1) have prior-period report reissued or (2) include paragraph in current report describing the lesser responsibility assumed
47
If a prior period is audited when the current period is compiled or reviewed, what should the separate paragraph say about the accountant's assumed responsibility?
(1) That the prior statements were audited (2) Previous report's date (3) Previous report's opinion (4) If opinion wasn't unqualified, the reasons why (5) That no audit procedures were performed after the prior report's date
48
What is the authority for attestation engagements?
Statements on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE)
49
What is an attestation engagement?
An examination, review, or performance of agreed-upon procedures on some information provided
50
What happens if an accountant performs an attest engagement as part of a larger engagement?
SSAE applies only to the attestation part of the engagement, and any report issued by the accountant under other standards (besides SSAE) should be distinguished from the attestation report
51
What different things can be covered by an attest engagement?
(1) Historical information (2) Prospective information (3) Physical characteristics (e.g. square footage) (4) Historical events (5) Analyses (e.g. break-even) (6) Systems or processes (e.g. internal control) (7) Behavior (e.g. regulatory compliance, HR)
52
What is a necessary first step in an attest engagement?
Determining the "responsible party": the party responsible for providing the information which the accountant is assessing Usually is management but not necessarily (e.g. might be another entity's mgmt who is trying to sell property to the client)
53
Is it possible for there to be no responsible party in an attest engagement?
Yes, in which case a party who could reasonably make a written assertion about the info becomes the responsible party The accountant can never be the responsible party
54
What are the five general standards for attest engagements?
(1) Training (2) Knowledge (3) Criteria (by which to evaluate the information in a useful way) (4) Independence (5) Due Professional Care
55
What are the two fieldwork standards for attest engagements?
(1) Planning & Supervision | (2) Evidence
56
Reports for which kinds of attest engagements are usually general use reports?
Reports on examination or review engagements are usually general use, but reports on applications of agreed-upon procedures are usually restricted
57
What is the basic difference between an examination and a review?
They reduce the attestation risk down to different levels: examinations reduce it to an appropriately low level, while reviews lower it only to a moderate level Reviews typically involve only inquiries and analytical procedures, while examinations can involve more
58
Under what conditions should a report for an attestation engagement be restricted?
(1) When criteria are appropriate only for specific parties (2) When criteria are available only to specific parties (3) When a written assertion has not been provided by the responsible party (4) When the engagement is to apply agreed-upon procedures
59
What are the common features of reports on either examinations or reviews?
(1) Title with word "independent" (2) Statement that the responsible party is responsible for the subject matter (or assertion) (3) Subject matter (or assertion) itself, and the identification of the responsible party (4) Restriction of report (if applicable) (5) Signature and date
60
What are prospective financial statements (PFS)?
Financial forecasts or projections, including summaries of significant assumptions and policies Distinct from pro forma statements
61
What is the difference between a financial forecast and a financial projection?
A projection is based more on hypothetical scenarios
62
Are financial forecasts and projections approved for general use, or should they be restricted?
Only financial forecasts are appropriate for general use (though not all are)
63
What is a partial presentation?
Prospective financial information which is less than full PFS
64
What information should be on reports for both forecasts and projections?
(1) That prospective results might not occur (2) That the accountant isn't responsible to update it after the report date (3) Signature & date
65
If PFS lack a summary of significant assumptions, can the accountant still provide a compilation on them?
No
66
What must a document with pro forma financial info include?
The most recent historical financial statements (HFS) These HFS must have been audited or reviewed
67
What level of assurance can an accountant give for pro forma financial info?
No more than the lowest level of assurance provided by the HFS themselves E.g. if HFS have been audited at year-end and reviewed at an interim date, then the accountant could perform an examination of the year-end info but merely a review of the interim info
68
What is the different purpose for an examination on pro forma information than for a review?
As with all examinations and reviews, an examination would provide reasonable assurance that the pro forma info is suitable, whereas a review would provide negative assurance (i.e. nothing came to the accountant's attention that would be problematic about the info)
69
How should a report on pro forma information be presented?
Can be added to the report on HFS, or can be separate
70
What should be included in a report on pro forma information?
(1) Paragraph explaining the limitations of pro forma info (2) Reference to the actual HFS (3) Date
71
Can an accountant provide a review on a client's internal control over financial reporting?
No, he can only perform an examination, not a review
72
What constitutes a material weakness in internal controls?
A deficiency (or combination of them) that results in a "reasonable possibility" that a material misstatement will not be detected or prevented
73
What are the different tests an accountant might perform when examining internal controls?
(1) Inquiry (2) Observation (3) Inspection of documents (4) Recalculation (5) Reperformance
74
What would be an improper report for an accountant to issue upon internal controls?
A report stating no deficiencies were identified, or a report stating that no material weaknesses were identified
75
What is a compliance attestation engagement?
An engagement which assesses the compliance of a client with certain requirements (legal, regulatory, contractual, etc.)
76
What is the "responsible party" responsible for in a compliance engagement?
Ensuring that the entity complies with the applicable requirements (and the effectiveness of internal control over compliance) Also responsible to provide a written assertion regarding compliance
77
For a compliance engagement, what should the accountant do if the responsible party refuses to provide a written representation letter?
If the client is the responsible party, then the accountant ought to withdraw; otherwise it is not necessary
78
What is a subservice organization?
A service organization employed by a service organization
79
What is the carve-out method?
Used when there is a service organization and a subservice organization -- excludes the subservice organization's control objectives and related controls from the scope of the audit engagement
80
What is the inclusive method?
The opposite of the carve-out method -- includes the subservice organization's control objectives and related controls in the scope of the audit engagement
81
What two kinds of reports can an auditor give for an engagement on a service organization?
Type 1 and Type 2 report Both report on management's description of a service organization's system and its design of controls
82
What is the difference between a Type 1 and Type 2 report for service organization engagements?
Type 1 assesses the design of controls as of a given date Type 2 assesses it throughout a given period

AUD (20 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions