p-block - compounds Flashcards
(56 cards)
why do p-block elements form compounds if they can already form elemental structures that provide them with an octet?
stability - structures of pure elements that allow the octet rule to be obeyed are more stable than unbonded atoms, but compounds formed when combined with other elements are usually even more stable
why are compounds more stable?
heteronuclear bonds tend to be stronger than homonuclear bonds, this is because 2 different elements have an electronegativity difference, so the bond is polar, there is additional electrostatic attraction between the atoms
stronger bonds = lower energy = more stable
give 1 piece of evidence that heteronuclear bonds are stronger than homonuclear bonds?
comparing homonuclear bond strength to X-F bond strengths for p-block compounds shows that the X-F compounds have stronger bonds
- 2 exceptions are Cl and Br, their X-F bonds are weaker than their homonuclear bonds as F has a very small atomic radius, so X-F bonds are significantly shorter, meaning lone pairs are closer and there is greater repulsion, weakening the bond
how does the bond strength of X-F heteronuclear bonds change across a period?
this is opposite to the trend in homonuclear bonds, as F is the most electronegative element and electronegativity increases across periods, the electronegativity difference between the two elements in X-F bond decreases across a period, making the bonds less polar and therefore not as strong
how does the bond strength of X-F change down a group?
there is no consistent trend - this is a battle between 2 factors
- bond strength generally weakens down groups as orbital overlap gets poorer
- electronegativity difference increases going down groups as electronegativity decreases down groups, which should strengthen the bond
between groups either factor can dominate, so there is no real trend
how are oxidation states assigned for p-block elements?
electronegativity is used to assign oxidation states
what is the oxidation state of N in NH3 vs in NF3?
in NH3, N is more electronegative than H, so there is a δ- charge on N, so O.S = -3
in NF3, F is more electronegative than N, so there is a δ+ charge on N, so O.S = +3
- remember, oxidation state doesn’t = actual formal charge, bonds are polar but not so much that N completely transfers its electrons to F
for each group in p-block (not 18), what is the maximum O.S?
maximum O.S is when the atom ‘loses’ all its valence electrons to a more electronegative element, so:
group 13, 3 valence electrons, max O.S = +3
group 14, 4 valence electrons, max O.S = +4
group 15, 5 valence electrons, max O.S = +5
group 16, 6 valence electrons, max O.S = +6
group 17, 7 valence electrons, max O.S = +7
for each group in p-block (not 18), what is the -ve O.S that gives it an octet?
-ve O.S that gives an octet are electrons ‘gained’ from a less electronegative element:
group 13, needs (8-3=) 5 electrons, -ve O.S = -5
group 14, needs (8-4=) 4 electrons, -ve O.S = -4
group 15, needs (8-5=) 3 electrons, -ve O.S = -3
group 16, needs (8-6=) 2 electrons, -ve O.S = -3
group 17, needs (8-7=) 1 electrons, -veO.S = -1
for each group in p-block (not 18), what is the inert pair O.S?
this is the no. valence electrons - 2, all are +ve:
group 13, 3 valence electrons, inert pair O.S = +1
group 14, 4 valence electrons, inert pair O.S = +2
group 15, 5 valence electrons, inert pair O.S = +3
group 16, 6 valence electrons, inert pair O.S = +4
group 17, 7 valence electrons, inert pair O.S = +5
why is it not possible for a group 13 element to achieve its -ve O.S that gives it an octet?
the necessary oxidation state is -5, as it already has 3 valence electrons and 8-3 = 5
however group 13 elements only has 3 valence electrons, so it doesn’t have enough electrons to form 5 bonds
what is the inert pair effect?
going down each group, the O.S that = maximum O.S. - 2 becomes increasingly stable, tends to be the most stable for row 6 elements
in this inert pair O.S the valence s-orbital remains filled giving ns2 valence electron configuration, these electrons are unreactive, they are an inert pair, do not form bonds
this means the maximum amount of bonds that can be formed are just from the electrons in p-orbitals, which is maximum O.S/valence electrons - 2
how does the inert pair effect change the structures of compounds?
the inert pair effect changes the structures of the most stable fluorides for each element going down, e.g. in group 13, BF3, AlF3 … TiF
what bonding models best describes bonding of p-block compounds?
bonding is adequately described by valence bond theory, with bonding occurring mostly through sp3 or sp2 hybrid orbitals - this requires the electrons in valence s-orbitals to be promoted to the p-orbital
why does the inert pair O.S become more stable down the group?
bond strength decreases down the group, and at the bottom it is so low that the energetic pay off for forming 2 extra bonds doesn’t compensate for promotion energy required to form them
how do reduction potentials provide proof of the inert pair effect?
going down group 13, for the reduction half equation X^3+ + 2e- <–> X^+ which brings an element from its maximum O.S to its inert pair O.S, the reduction potential becomes increasingly more +ve, as reduction becomes more favourable as the inert pair O.S becomes more stable
give evidence using reduction potentials for the trend in oxidising power of halogens
for reduction half equation X2 + 2e- <–> 2X^- reduction potential becomes more -ve going down the group, as reduction is disfavoured, meaning oxidising power decreases down the group, they become less strong oxidants
- this is not because of electronegativity as that refers to attraction of electrons in a covalent bond, not free floating ions
- this is because of enthalpy cycles, based on atomisation, electron affinity and hydration enthalpies
disproportionation definition
a reaction in which a species is both oxidised and reduced, its O.S increases and decreases
comproportionation definition
a reaction in which a species with 2 different O.S reacts to form a compound with an intermediate O.S - opposite of disproportionation
what is the purpose of latimer diagrams?
they are used for elements that exist in multiple O.S and can be used to show if disproportionation reactions are favourable, by allowing half equations to be made + Ecell to be determined, which needs to be +ve for the reaction to be favourable
what are frost diagrams + their purpose?
frost diagrams are a graph of -nFE° against O.S
- recall ΔG = -nFE°, where n = no. electrons transferred in reaction, F = faradays constant
these diagrams provide good visual representation of relative stabilities of O.S and whether or not species are prone to disproportionation/comproportionation
the varies O.S of a element are plotted and lines are drawn between any 2 species/states, if a third species lies above the line, that species tends to disproportionate into the neighbouring species on the line
if the third species lies below the line, neighbouring species on the line tend to comproportionate into that third species
coordination number definition
the number of atoms/ligands bonded to a central atom
why do row 2 elements have a maximum coordination number of 4?
this is because row 2 elements are very small
what are the typical coordination numbers + geometries of row 2 p-block elements?
group 13 = B, forms BF4^-, tetrahedral
group 14 = C, forms CF4, tetrahedral
group 15 = N, forms NF3, trigonal pyramidal = tetrahedral derivative
group 16 = O, forms OF2, angled = square planar derivative
group 17 = F, forms F2, linear