Page 5 Flashcards
(44 cards)
What are the two questions you should always ask when dealing with proximate cause?
- Was the harm foreseeable?
2. Were there intervening acts?
If you drive 90 km/h in a 50 km/hour zone and your passenger has a heart attack, are you proximate cause of his death?
Unless you should have reasonably foreseen that your culpably negligent driving would cause a heart attack, you shouldn’t be guilty of manslaughter
What is the substantial factor test?
If two people inflict mortal wounds on a victim and either is enough to kill him, it must be asked whether the defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in bringing about the result
If there are multiple assailants that aren’t working together, how does guilt work?
Each are as guilty as the other
If you hasten someone’s death, what does that mean for liability?
You are the cause of death
If you prematurely pull the plug on a terminally ill patient, how does that affect your liability?
You were the cause of death
If April goes on a desert trek and you poison her water, but Bo steals the water and April dies of thirst, who is the cause of death?
Bo, because he was the actual cause
If there is a small difference between what you meant to happen and what actually happened, are you still the direct cause?
Yes
What is an intervening cause?
When your intended result is achieved in an unintended way because of an intervening act
If there is a coincidence that wasn’t foreseeable as an intervening cause, are you liable?
No
If there is a response to your actions that is an intervening cause, are you liable?
Yes
If there is no evidence that your act caused or accelerated the victim’s death, are you liable?
No
What is a superseding intervening act?
An intervening act that breaks the chain of causation
If an act is foreseeable, will it be superseding?
No
If an act is unforeseeable, will it break the chain of causation?
Probably
What is a dependent intervening act?
Intervening act that doesn’t break the chain of causation
What are the four different intervening cause categories?
A. Victim
B. Third person
C. Defendant
D. Nonhuman source
How can a victim be an intervening cause?
If the victim in someway contributes to his own death after the defendant’s attack
What are the ways a victim can contribute to his own death?
- trying to escape
- impulsively acting to avoid harm
- acting voluntarily to refuse treatment
- committing suicide
If the victim contributes to his own death, how does that affect the guilt of the defendant?
Usually means the defendant is still guilty
How can a third person be an intervening cause?
- negligent treatment by a doctor
- another defendant coming along and also harming the victim
If a doctor negligently treats a wound, does that make him the proximate cause of death?
Only if the negligence was gross negligence, because ordinary negligence is not abnormal and doesn’t cut off liability
If you shoot someone and leave them to die, and another stabs them and hastens the death, that person is guilty of murder. Are you?
Yes because at the time of death both wounds were contributing to the life shortening process, or your intent to kill that person made him unable to defend himself against the other, so you proximately caused the death
How can the defendant be an intervening cause?
If the defendant thought he killed the victim, but didn’t, and actually killed him while trying to dispose of the body