Page 13 Flashcards Preview

Criminal FYLSE > Page 13 > Flashcards

Flashcards in Page 13 Deck (32):

What is required for the act component to be an accomplice?

Give assistance/encouragement or failed to perform a legal duty to prevent it


Can encouragement happen a long time before a crime is committed and you can still be guilty of accomplice liability?



Is it possible for encouragement under accomplice liability to be communicated to the principal through an intermediary?



What are some examples of giving assistance that would count under accomplice liability?

Providing money, guns, supplies, being a lookout, driving a getaway car, etc.


If you have a duty to prevent a crime, but you don't, can you be liable for accomplice liability?



Under the common-law if you yell words of encouragement someone that is deaf or unaware of your presence, can you be guilty of accomplice liability?



Under the MPC if you aid/attempts to eat a crime, and you no impact on the crime, can you be guilty of accomplice liability?

Yes, because the focus is on the defendant's blameworthiness


What are the two things that are required for mental state for accomplice liability?

- intend to assist the commission of the crime
- intend that the principal actually commit the crime


If you intentionally engage in the act, is that enough to meet the mental requirement for accomplice ability?

No, you must intentionally assist the crime


What Are the three tests to determine your purpose for mental state for accomplice liability?

• nexus
• stake in the venture


What is the Nexus test for accomplice liability?

If there's a connection/relationship between the accomplice and principle, It can show the purpose of aiding


What is the stake in the venture test for accomplice liability?

Look at how much the accomplice sought to gain ie) kickbacks


What is the MPC test to determine purpose for accomplice liability?

Defendant must have the purpose of promoting/facilitating the commission of the crime


If you were misled about the circumstances, and intended to aid, can you be liable for accomplice liability?

Sometimes no


If you help to break into a house that you were told you had permission to enter, Will you be guilty of accomplice liability?

Probably not


If you act as an accomplice with the intent to report the person to the police, will you be liable for accomplice liability?

No, if you don't have the mental state to commit the act


What two things are required to be an accomplice?

Aid plus knowledge


How does willful blindness play into accomplice liability?

To be an accomplice, the defendant must of wanted the venture to succeed, which implies that he knew what it was


What is the split in authority over mental state for accomplice liability?

- CL: defendant had to intend to give aid, and intend that a crime take place
- other view: defendant had to intend to help with the mental state required for the completed offense (could be recklessness)
- MPC: defendant had to act with knowledge that another was committing a crime, and knowingly facility its commission


Because a principal must know of the accomplice's intentions, what kind of things are not enough for accomplice liability?

Just being present at the scene, refusing to intervene, prior relationship, presence plus flight, approving of another's conduct


How can the act component of accomplice liability be satisfied even without a physical act?

Assisting/encouraging reckless or negligent behavior


Example of assistance/encouraging reckless or negligent behavior that could be considered an act for accomplice liability:

Allowing a drunk person to drive your car


What is the split of authority on assisting reckless/negligent behavior being an act for accomplice liability?

- some courts say giving assistance to someone that will engage in conduct dangerous to life is enough
- others say it isn't because you have to have actual intent to assist the crime


What happens for compass liability in a situation where a person gives assistance in knowing a crime will result, but doesn't care if it actually happens?

- CL: knowledge is enough if it was enough for the completed crime
- MPC: knowledge isn't enough, must have intent for crime to happen. Defendant must have knowledge plus a stake in the venture


If you sell sugar to someone knowing they will make whiskey, and the target offense involves knowingly making illegal liquor, what does the MPC and the common law say about this?

- CL: guilty of accomplice liability
- MPC: must've had a stake in the venture, or intent for the crime to happen


Currently the majority position is what as far as principle's guilt determining accomplice's guilt?

Accomplices can now be convicted even though the principal was acquitted, but guilt of the principal must be shown as proof against the accomplice


What are three exceptions to accomplice liability?

• protected class
• MPC necessary party rule
• crime's definition


What is the protected class exception to accomplice liability?

You can't be an accomplice if you assisted a crime that you're part of the protected class of


Why can't a girl who seduced an older man to have sex with her not be liable as an accomplice to statutory rape?

Because she is part of the class that the statute was meant to protect


What Is the MPC necessary party rule?

If the crime requires two people and the statue only punishes one of them, you can't convict the other as an accomplice ie) Bribery/prostitution


What is the definition exception to accomplice liability?

Some crimes can only be committed by certain people ie) incest/rape


Can someone that can't directly commit a crime be liable by acting as an accomplice to someone that can?

Yes, like in a rape situation