paper 1 past paper 2024 Flashcards
(52 cards)
Question 1 - Ethical concern of research into social influence, name at least one study. (4)
Deception - Asch, Milgram
Psychological harm - Zimbardo, milgram
Informed consent - Asch, Milgram, Zimbardo
Right to withdraw - Milgram, Zimbardo
Question 2 - Applied Explanations for conformity (6)
People agree with the opinion of the majority in order to be liked and gain approval/avoid ridicule
This leads to compliance which is where people will agree publicly with the group privately but they do not change their personal opinions
Theory related to conformity such as informational social influence and/or internalisation
Identification ; When a person changes their public behaviour and private belief but only when they are in the presence of the group. Short term change the result of nsi.
Question 3 - Applied Explanations for obedience (6)
Credit also the inverse of factors usually used to explain conformity and obedience, eg (lack of) uniform; (increased) distance between participant and victim/authority figure; (reduced) group size; (lack of) ambiguity of task; (lack of) social support.
Authoritarian personality: a collection of traits/dispositions developed from strict/rigid parenting; examples of traits - conformist /conventional/dogmatic; obedient/servile towards people of perceived higher status
Legitimacy of authority: of context/setting; genuineness/status of authority figure.
Agentic shift/state: person ‘unthinkingly’ carries out orders; diffusion of responsibility
Consistency and Flexibility role in minority influence (8)
Consistency is repeating the same message
Flexibility is listening to others and being willing to change an opinion
Minority influence refers to situations where one person or a small group of people change the ideas or beliefs of other people.
Moscovici, Nameth, Martin et al
Use of artificial materials
Other factors may be involved (commitment)
Issues with specific studies (Moscovici had very low % influence)
Applied explain how inferential testing can improve this investigation (3)
Establish a relationship between the two variables
Generalise results to the general population
Quantify results
Establish a conclusion
Explain two differences between episodic and semantic memories (4)
Episodic is knowledge of situations/events, semantic is knowledge of facts
Stored in different locations in the brain as represented by the cases of Patient HM and clive wearing
Episodic memories are time stamped, semantic are not
Episodic memories are related to emotions (strength determined by emotions, semantic are not)
Episodic and semantic memories must be recalled consciously, whereas procedural memories are recalled unconsciously.
Explain retrieval failure as an explanation for forgetting. Outline one limitation. (4)
Forgetting is due to insufficient clues or cues
Lack of external contextual cues - where environment for learning and recall is different (Context-dependent forgetting)
Lack of internal contextual cues - where physical state from learning and recall is different (State-dependent forgetting)
Use of artificial materials in lab studies
— The findings from studies of retrieval failure may lack and ecological validity. This is because Baddeley argued that it is difficult to find conditions in real-life which are as polar as water and land, for example, and thus questioned the existence of context effects in normal life. This suggests that retrieval failure may be best suited to explaining cases of forgetting where the cues associated with encoding and retrieval are uncommonly distinct, thus not providing an accurate depiction of forgetting in day to day life.
Question 1 - Which attachment behaviour is being shown in stem. (1)
Reciprocity
Question 2 - Which attachment behaviour is being shown in stem. (1)
Interactional synchrony
Explain the concepts ‘Critical Period’ and ‘Internal Working Model’ in the context of attachment (6)
Notion of critical/sensitive period up to approx. 2 years
Attachment to primary caregiver provides child with internal working model of relationships (Bowlby). The model represents/gives a mental view of relationship with primary figure and acts as a template for future relationships. Continuity in quality/type of relationship across generations. Credit application of knowledge and research into the origin and/or consequence of the internal working model e.g. Bailey et al
Multiple choice, tick the 2 that are emotional characteristics of OCD (2)
anxiety
low mood
Explain the two process model using STEM (8)
Acquired by classical conditioning - UCS was the breaking the arm/ danger associated with the dog and the NS was the dog which causes the conditioned response.
Leads to avoidance and the phobia is maintained by operant conditioning through positive and negative reinforcement. The Relief felt from avoidance.
when avoiding balloons becomes reinforcing
Description of the two-process theory
Reference to avoidance learning; reference to generalisation.
Name a cognitive approach to explaining depression
Elis’ ABC model
Becks cognitive explanation for depression
What does the ABC model stand for?
Activating event
Belief
Consequence
Explain Elis’ ABC model
A stands for the activating event which happens in someone’s life. B is the belief about why that event occurred. C is the consequence of that belief. If the belief is irrational, then it will lead to to negative emotions like depression. These irrational beliefs come from musturbatory thinking.
Explain Becks cognitive explanation for depression
Beck’s cognitive explanation for depression sees the roots of the disorder as lying in traumatic childhood experiences, such as continual parental criticism and/or rejection by others. These experiences lead to negative cognitive schemas developing, such as expecting to fail in situations similar to those present when the schemas were learned. These expectations lead to depression. Negative schemas and biases maintain what Beck calls the negative triad, a pessimistic and irrational view relating to the self, the world, and the future
What is Beck’s negative triad?
a pessimistic and irrational view relating to the self, the world, and the future
Give a negative of cognitive explanations of depression.
= Both the ABC model and Beck’s cognitive theory of depression share the same disadvantage in that they cannot explain all aspects of depression e.g. hallucinations, anger. This poses a particularly difficult practical issue in that patients may become frustrated that their symptoms cannot be explained according to this theory and therefore cannot be addressed in therapy.
Another problem is that, it is very likely that genetic factors and neurotransmitters are involved in depression. Research has shown that depressed people have lower levels of serotonin. This means that neurotransmitters also play a role in causing depression, and so a diathesis-stress model could be a better explanation for depression rather than cognitive or biological explanations on their own.
Give 2 positives of cognitive explanations of depression.
+ = An increased understanding of the cognitive basis of depression translates to more effective treatments i.e. elements of the cognitive triad can be easily identified by a therapist and challenged as irrational thoughts on the patient’s part. Thus, it translates well into a successful therapy and the consequent effectiveness of CBT (as discussed later on) is merit to the accuracy of Beck’s cognitive theory as an explanation for depression.
+ = The ABC model shares the same advantage as Beck’s cognitive theory in that it provides a practical application in CBT. The effectiveness of CBT suggests that identifying and challenging irrational beliefs are at the core of ‘curing’ depression, which in turn supports the theoretical basis of the ABC model, through a specific focus on the role of faulty cognitions in the development of depression and specifically, in the interpretation of an activating event.
Name a Romanian orphan story
Rutter et al (2007) who investigated the effects of institutionalization on 165 Romanian orphans
Describe Rutter et al (2007) procedure
165 Romanian orphans assessed at 4, 6 and 11 years old in terms of physical, emotional and psychological development. compared to 50 British orphans
Describe Rutter et al (2007) findings
Majority of orphans were malnourished.
IQ dependent on age of adoption. E.G. those adopted at 6 months had 25 more IQ points than those at 2 (as demonstrated by Goldman)
Those after 6 months showed signs of disinhibited attachment - characterized by attention seeking, and affectionate behaviour towards any adults - due to too many caregivers within the critical period to create a secure attachment
Give an advantage of Rutter et al (2007)
The main advantage of Rutter’s study, compared to other adoption studies, is that he was able to study the effects of institutionalisation in isolation through removing the confounding and extraneous variables of PTSD and trauma often associated with war orphans. This increases the confidence that researchers can place in drawing conclusions about the effects of institutionalisation and the displayed differential rates of recovery
Give two weaknesses’ of Rutter
- A key methodological issue with Rutter’s study is the focus on short-term recovery, rather than long term rates. For example, just because a child adopted at the age of 3 does not exhibit normal intellectual development at age 4 does not mean that the child has an intellectual disability or that they will not achieve normal development at a drawn, it would have been to carry out the study across a longer time scale.
- Some researchers have criticised the findings from Rutter’s study as having very low ecological validity because the conditions of the Romanian orphanages were especially poor. For example, the orphanages did not provide any intellectual stimulation for the orphans, which may have had a larger impact on their intellectual development compared to maternal deprivation as a single cause. Cases of abuse were also frequently reported. Since the average orphanage would have considerably better conditions, this suggests that the findings cannot be generalised beyond the research setting they were found in.