paper 3 Flashcards
(37 cards)
what statistical tests should be done if data is in 2 groups?
parametric: t-test
non-parametric: Mann-Whitney U test
what statistical tests should be done if data is categorical not numerical?
compare 2 variables: Chi-squared
test proportions: Z-test (binomial)
what statistical tests should be done if data is paired?
parametric: paired t-test
non-parametric: Wilcoxon signed-rank test
what statistical tests should be done if data is more than 2 groups?
- parametric: ANOVA
- non-parametric: Kruskal-Wallis test
what statistical tests should be done if data has multiple variables you are seeking the relationship between?
- parametric: Pearson correlation regression
- non-parametric: Spearman correlation
what are the key points to include for Q1 central aims?
- overall aim, identifies what paper set out to do, and what it proves: reword title
- specific aims that recap each experiment
- summarise main findings
- highlight IMPORTANCE, what is unique about the study
- did they use interesting techniques?
- place aim in context of the field
- what they tested, which led to what they found
what are the key points to include for Q1 key figure?
- the figure which recaps the central aim + best proves results they set out to find
- describe what they did, what they found
- explain techniques + validation of those techniques
- why does data in the figure support the central aims
- can the results from the figure demonstrate causality?
when describing the experiment/technique, include what?
- specificity!!
- chronologically explain experiment
- why was experiment designed in the way it was
- data analysis + post-hoc analysis
- why was it conducted?
- how should results be interpreted?
advantages + disadvantages of Cre transgenics
- A: highly specific expression under a tissue-specific promoter
- D: every cell with gene expressed can be activated
- sometimes lack of full transfection
- numerous controls + postmorterm to validate expression specificity
- insertions of seqs can disrupt endogenous genes, disrupt cognitive/emotional circuitry
advantages + disadvantages of viral injection transgenics?
- A: spatial specificity based on site of injection
- temporal specificity
- target specific cell types if combined with cre recombinase lines
- D: success depends on levels of transduction in target neurons, variability common
- off-target effects due to non-uniformity of light scattering
- potential damage + inflammation
advantages + disadvantages of behavioural studies?
- D: difficult to interpret in some rodents
- genetic modification can alter normal behaviour, or cause more general deficits
advantages + disadvantages of electrophysiology?
- A: combine brain + muscular activity measurements
- monitor brain states
- quantifiable
- good temporal resolution
- D: poor spatial resolution
- passive recordings don’t confer causal information
advantages + disadvantages of viral GFP labelling
- A: labels whole cell (axons + dendrites)
- can be used in living preparation, which can be exposed to multiple techniques
- target injections to region of interest
- D: injections damaging + inflammatory
- retrovirus can infect other cells
- BrdU is more efficient in labelling dividing cells
- variable amount of virus injected (precision + accuracy)
- GFP not always fluorescent, may require IHC
advantages + disadvantages of 2p microscopy
- A: allow imaging at depth 10x confocal bc longer wavelength
- less photobleaching + phototoxicity
- very good spatial resolution bc narrow plane of focus
- live imaging, non-damaging
- different colours
- within subject comparisons
- D: stress caused to animal with multiple recording devices
- tracers can interact with each other
advantages + disadvantages of optogenetics
- A: can manipulate neural activity in freely moving animals (close to physiological conditions)
- reversible
- high temporal + spatial specificity
- animal serves as its own control
- activation is more selective than direct electrode activation
- D: need to check for lesions at surgical site, correcti fibre optic positioning
- light scattering –> not all cells equally activated/inhibited
- need to implant the optical fibre
advantages + disadvantages of chemogenetics
- A: longer timeframe, better for behavioural studies
- fully reversible
- high temporal + spatial res
- non-invasive compared to optogeneics
- animal can be its own control
- D: need strict controls
- need to target the entire population of cells expressing the gene
- neurons can respond variably to GPCR action, need to do electrophys in vitro to see how neurons respons
what is chemogenetics?
- uses genetically engineered receptors to modualte neural activity/pathways using specific small molecule drugs
- uses chemical ligands rather than opsin channels
- before this, TMS and DBS were used to study relationship between neuronal activity and behaviour
what are the most common GPCRs used in chemogenetics?
- DREADDs, get activated solely by drug of interest
why is chemogenetics now favoured over optogenetics?
- C does not require expensive light equipment
- resolution in O declines due to light scattering + illuminance declining over distance -> leads to lower spatial resolution
- C represents a pharmacological avenue
what to consider when critiquing data
- are methods appropriate?
- is actual data good?
- have multiple techniques been used?
- are statistics valid?
- have results been overinterpreted?
- are controls good?
- correlation vs causation, necessary vs sufficient?
- propose methods to improve weaknesses
what to look for in stats?
- what do error bars represent?
- check for independent means, not subsamples
- is data normally disitributed (if n > 10, central limit theorem kicks in)
- spread of data
- is test appropriate? same variances?
- what about the power of the study?
how to increase power of statistical test?
- increase sample size
- reduce measurement error
- increase effect size
- increase significant level
- use one-tailed instead of two-tailed
what is effect size and how can you increase it?
effect size = a measure of strength of relationship between 2 variables in a population i.e. correlation, regression coefficient, mean difference, risk
increase it: reduce standard deviation of it, removing irrelevant particiapnts, optimising experimental designs + measures
works well when massive sample sizes are not feasible, for example in psychologically interesting phenomena
what is a big or small effect size?
- small: d < 0.5
- medium: 0.5 < d < 0.8
- large: 0.8 < d < 1.3