Parts of a Research Proposal Flashcards

(25 cards)

1
Q

The introduction should include the following except,

○ Problem described
○ Rationale of the study
○ future studies that addressed the problem
○ Deficiencies or gap in the previous studies
○ Significance of the study described

A

○ future studies that addressed the problem (malamang, dpaat previous)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. clear and specific
  2. TOF. The general objective cannot be specifically
    measured.
  3. TOF. You measure the specific objective by way of formulating the general objective.
A
  1. Objective
  2. T
  3. F (You measure the general objective by way of formulating the specific objective)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  • Should be described in sufficient details such that other competent researchers will be able to repeat the study. Details are important!
  • DO NOT USE VERBS IN THE PAST TENSE!
A

Methodology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

○ Is it a descriptive study or an analytic study?
○ Is it an observational or experimental study? If
observational, specify, cross-sectional, case control or
cohort. If experimental, specify.

A

Research design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  • population where your study will be applied to
  • Describe/define who is your target population.
  • For example, if your target population is stroke patients, describe or define how do you determine patients have strokes?
  • Is there a set of criteria used to make the diagnosis? If so, did you follow the criteria?
  • If it is a case-control, describe/define as well who is the control, and how they will be diagnosed.
A

Target population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND THE TIME PERIOD

TOF.
1. INCLUDE the participants who have fulfilled the inclusion criteria but have characteristics that can influence the outcome or results of the study.
2. exclusion criteria IS NOT the opposite of the inclusion criteria
3. DO NOT put those who refuse to sign the informed
consent, those who are not willing to participate

A
  1. F (exclude)
  2. T
  3. T
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

STUDY PROCEDURE

  • Recruitment of participants.
  • Method of assignment to study groups.
  • Description of procedure/s for the experimental and control group.
  • Laboratory procedures
  • Follow-up procedures.
A

INTERVENTIONAL STUDIES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  • Sampling methodology
  • Recruitment of participants.
  • Data collection and method
  • Data to be collected
  • Instrument/s to be used for measuring exposure and/or outcome
  • Instrument/s used
  • Laboratory procedures, if applicable.
  • Follow-up, if applicable.
  • Biosafety Clearance
A

OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

VARIABLE DESCRIPTION or OPERATIONAL DEFINITION

TOF.
1. Define only the variables you will collect
2. DEFINE the participants of the study here
3. Dependent, independent, and confounders should be defined operationally.

A
  1. T
  2. F
  3. T
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

TOF. The sample size based on the methodology.

A

F (objectives)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ETHICAL CONSIDERATION

  • Anticipated risks and ———-
  • Expected ———- to the subjects, et al.
  • Assurance of ———- and ———-
A
  • discomforts
  • benefits
  • confidentiality and anonymity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES

Better presented as a

A

Gantt chart

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

FORMULATING THE TITLE

TOF.
1. It is recommended to choose complex and erudite language
2. Sound research titles are written in a straightforward, uncomplicated language, easy to read and understand

A

F
T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

RULES IN MAKING A TITLE

Max of words

A

12

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

From what manual states:
* title should summarize the main idea of the manuscript simply and, if possible, with style
* A title should be fully explanatory when standing alone.
* A good title is easily shortened to the running head used within the published article
* Titles are commonly indexed and compiled in numerous reference works.
* Occasionally a term such as a research synthesis or a meta-analysis or MRI study of conveys important information for the potential reader and is included in the title.
* Avoid using abbreviations in a title
* title should be typed in uppercase and lowercase
letters, centered between the left and right margins, and positioned in the upper half of the page.

A

FROM THE AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION (APA) MANUAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

From the?

  • The title provides a distilled description of the complete
    article and should include information that, along with the
    abstract, will make electronic retrieval of the article sensitive
    and specific.
  • Reporting guidelines recommend and some journals require
    that information about the study design be a part of the
    title (particularly important for randomized trials and
    systematic reviews and meta-analyses).
  • Some journals require a short title, usually no more than 40
    characters (including letters and spaces) on the title page or
    as a separate entry in an electronic submission system.
  • Electronic submission systems may restrict the number of
    characters in the title
A

THE INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF MEDICAL JOURNAL EDITORS (ICMJE)

17
Q

The contents of the introduction may be remembered with the mnemonic IMRAD:

A

○ Introduction—Why did you study?
○ Methods—Who, What, When, Where and How did you study?
○ Results–What did you find?
○ And Discussion–What do the findings mean?

18
Q

The introduction consists of 5 parts

A

○ The research problem
○ Studies that have addressed the problem
○ Deficiencies/inconsistencies in the previous studies
○ The significance of the study
○ The purpose/aim of the study

19
Q

PURPOSE OF INTRODUCTION

Should consist of the:
○ Background of the problem
○ Magnitude of the problem
○ Implications of the problem

A

THE RESEARCH PROBLEM

20
Q

PURPOSE OF INTRODUCTION

  • Review studies that have examined the problem
  • In the review of literature found in the introduction, large
    groups of studies are summarized instead of individual
    studies.
    ○ This is in contrast to the ROL section, individual studies
    are discussed.
  • The purpose of the reviewing studies in the introduction is to
    justify the importance of the study and create distinction
    between past studies and the current study.
A

STUDIES THAT HAVE ADDRESSED THE PROBLEM

21
Q

PURPOSE OF INTRODUCTION

  • May exist because topics have not been explored in a
    particular group, sample or population.
  • Voice of the underrepresented groups has not been
    heard in published literature.
  • Flaws in the methodology, like research design, sampling
    methodology, absence of a control in clinical trial,
    inappropriate statistical tests, etc.
  • Sample size may be small.
  • Mention too how the present study will remedy or
    address the deficiencies.
A

DEFICIENCIES IN THE PAST LITERATURE

22
Q

PURPOSE OF INTRODUCTION

  • Practical application of the study
  • Improvement in the practice of the profession
A

SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

23
Q

PURPOSE OF INTRODUCTION

  • State the aim or direction of the study.
  • State here too your hypothesis and objectives
A

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

24
Q

WRITING THE INTRODUCTION IN A MEDICAL JOURNAL

REMEMBER the three-paragraph rule.

A

1ST PARAGRAPH The Problem
2ND PARAGRAPH Gap in the Literature
3RD PARAGRAPH Your Hypothesis/ses

25
PITFALLS IN THE INTRODUCTION
* Overlong and unnecessary background in introduction section * Exaggerating or understating the importance of your work. * Extensive listing of references and review * Too many objectives and not clearly stated * Inclusion of results and conclusion in the introduction section * Use of improper tenses–introduction is largely PRESENT tense