people Flashcards
(40 cards)
david cyranowski 2014
fraud and wook suk hwang 2004;
- fraud not that serious
- he continued to work
shiela jassanoff
the fifth branch + technologies of humility
- expert beahviour in public; fear of experts
- facts cant be seperated from values
- uncertainty always there hence open discussion needed
fraud/misconduct damages scientific credibility
- today is the age where science has to be justified to the public
regazzi 2004
publications are for global reserach community; hence quality is improved by peer review
john zimman
- post academic science (uni/industry and government)
PLACE norms: properiety, local, authoiry, commisssion, expert - science is individual and ethos not ethics
norms are internalized
scientific WORTH determined by PUBLIC reaction and recogition
norms are dynamic and applicalb ein different situations/different people
shapin
productiona nd communication of knolwedge are intertwined
manhattan project; oppenheimer and public moralists
bethe
public moralsit that went back to work on nuclear reserach as responsbility
picarra 2016
public reserach is public knowledge as publicly funded; hence SHARED software
science CULTURE changes
jerome ravetz 2016
uncertainity unkown; hence important to discuss in public intercourse
- murphys law= its a way of knowing
donald rumsfeld
iraq secretary of defense; ‘unknown unknowns’
stirling 2007
risk= probability ofo an event x magnitude of an event
ambiguity and uncertainity and ignorance
slovic 1987
perception of RISK; nuclear power study and misprection
gigerenzer
9/11 increased unintend consequences
gillinsky 2017
2017; unlikely events/consequeunces such as Japan 20011 nuclear meltdown
alvin weinberg
bs is ruining big science
big science; is very visual
nuclear power plants are uncertainity as risk asseasments are based on experience
ulrich bech 1992
risk society
risks as a way of dealing with modernism; source of risk in society always changes
source of risk changes
londa schiebinger
participation/culture and results of science
gendered science affects output of resources
different feminism is unhelpful
contradictions of englightenment ojbective view
bio vs pjysics
policies at fixing women not fixing science
micheal hulme
climate change controversies challenge conceptions and beliefs
a third of the public doesnt trust climate scientists to tell truth
scientists must demonstrate norms to public
trends vs policy vs impact vs attribution sceptivism
science is a cultural instition that evolves to survive
norms are a dynamic rhetoric
science works by value adjustments/behavioural changes
naomi klein
stealth advocay makes climate science bad
parents ask kids to fix stuff
daniel sarewitz
= more uncetainity by more knowledge in climate science
- 1960s policies on enviornment where visible and clear
politics about comprosies
have more facts fuels both sids
climategate just showed the naked, myth of pure science
humes guillotine 1739
values vs facts
knowing something doesnt give you the right to do something
roger pielke
honest broker (in situation of high uncertainity with severa; options)
abortion vs tornado politics
value and ethics are different things
gibbons 1994
mode one and mode two science
coodepence of public and science
science for public good vs inherent value
robert merton 1974
cudos/functionalism
science constist of professionalization, method and socialization
reward systems
quantity over qualtiy of publications
moral structures and communication systems
iam mitroff 1973
apollo moon scientists and norms as personal and human and as in balance with counter norms
