perception Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

what is sensation

A

physical stimulation of the sensory receptors is processed by the sense receptors
our brain interprets the information from our five senses which leads to perception

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is perception

A

organisation and interpretation of sensory information by the brain
information received from sense receptors is combined with the brains interpretation of what the information means

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the difference between sensation and perception

A

sensation is the detection of a stimulus in the environment such as light or sound waves

perception is the brain interpreting and understanding these sensations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the ponzo illusion

A

misinterpreted depth cue. two separate horizontal lines of the same length one above the other surrounded by two lines converging, gives the appearance of depth. people perceive the top horizontal line as longer than the one below because it appears to be more distant.

converging lines gives the illusion of distance. the brain uses size constancy and mentally scales up the more distant line while mentally scaling down the closer line

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the muller lyer illusion

A

misinterpreted depth cue. two separate horizontal lines of the same length, side by side. one with outgoing fins and one with ingoing fins. vertical lines with outgoing fins is perceived as longer than the vertical lines with ingoing fins.

outgoing fins are shaped like the inside corner of a room stretching away from us.
ingoing fins are shaped like the outside of a building projecting out.
we mentally scale up the line that appears closer so it appears longer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is rubins vase illusion

A

an ambigious figure. images of two faces and a vase in the same picture. both are correct so the brain cannot decide which image is shown.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is ames room

A

misinterpreted depth cue
room looks normal but is actually trapezoid shape. when two people stand on either side of the back wall, one appears to be much bigger than the other even though their both the same size.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the necker cube

A

the same image of a cube can be percieved as either pointing upwards to the right or downwards to the left

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is size constancy

A

the brain perceives familiar objects as a constant size despite the size of the image they produce on the retina changing with distance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what are misinterpreted depth cues

A

objects in the distance that appear smaller are scaled up by our brain so they look normal size. sometimes the brain sees distance when there isnt any which creates a visual illusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

whats an ambiguous figure

A

a type of visual illusion where there are two possible interpretations of the same image and the brain cannot decide which one to choose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is fiction

A

a type of visual illusion that causes the brain to see something that isnt there

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what is the kanizsa triangle

A

illusory contours to create the impression that a second triangle is overlapping the first one

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are visual cues

A

features of the environment that give us information about movement and distance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are visual constancies

A

objects look the same despite seeing them from different angles and distances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is retinal disparity

A

a binocular depth cue. each eye sees things differently as they are about 6cm apart on the face. retinal disparity is the difference between the left and the right eyes view. the brain uses this information to work out depth and distance

17
Q

what is convergence

A

a binocular depth cue. the eyes become closer together (converge) when objects are closer to us. muscles in the eye work harder when objects are close. this information is sent to the brain to give information about depth and distance.

18
Q

what is height in plane

A

objects that are higher up in the visual field appear further away

19
Q

relative size

A

smaller objects in the visual field appear further away

20
Q

occlusion

A

objects that are in front of others appear closer to us whilst objects behind seem further away

21
Q

linear perspective

A

when parallel lines converge in the distance the point at which they come together is perceived to be further away

22
Q

Describe Gibson’s theory of perception

A

Direct perception: sensation and perception are the same thing. the eyes detect everything we need to judge depth, distance and movement. we dont need past experience.

Optic flow patterns: when moving, the point we are moving towards is stationary, and everything else rushes away from it. this monocular depth cue is detected by our eyes which tells the brain we are moving, so we know the speed and direction we are moving in.

Motion parallax: this is another monocular depth cue which tells the brain the speed we are moving at. objects closer in the visual field move faster than objects further away.

the influence of nature: gibsons view is that the ability to perceive is inborn - we dont learn it. the eyes detect fine changes in light, texture, movement and depth so we can understand distance and depth.

23
Q

evaluate gibsons theory of perception:

A

one strength of gibsons theory is that it has real world meaning. research was based on the experience of pilots from the second world war. this makes it more relevant to explaining how we perceive the world on a daily basis.

a weakness of gibsons theory is that it struggles to explain visual illusions. gibson proposed that we will always perceive accurately where as visual illusions tricks the brain into misperception. this suggests that there is more to perception than his theory proposed.

another strength comes from gibsons and walks study. very few infants would crawl off a visual cliff. this suggests that infants have an ability to percieve depth, which shows that some perception in innate.

24
Q

Describe Gregorys theory of perception

A

the brain uses incoming sensory information plus information that we already know about the world. perception is therefore a construction.

inference: the brain uses sensory information that is available and then fills in the gaps. past experience means we infer what should be there and draw a conclusion.

visual cues: when making inferences, features of the environment (visual cues) give the brain information about depth, distance etc. visual illusions occur because the brain has drawn the wrong conclusion from the cues.

past experience: gregory proposes that perception depends on experience - learning. for example learning to see a chair as a chair. the more we interact with the world, the more sophisticated our perception becomes.

25
evaluate gregorys theory
one strength is that gregorys theory has support from studies of cultural differences in perception. for example, hudsons study showed that experience affects how visual cues are interpreted. this means that their difference experiences have affected their perception. one weakness relates to gregorys use of visual illusions to support his theory. they are artifical two dimensional images that are designed to fool us. as a consequence, his theory may not tell us much about how perception works in the real world. another weakness is that gregorys theory cannot explain how perception started. research has shown that babies have some perceptual abilities at birth. therefore not all perception is a result of past experience.
26
what is perceptual set
tendancy for our brain to notice some aspects of the environment more than others
27
what is culture
the social world that surrounds you
28
describe the study of culture affecting perception
aim: hudson aimed to find out whether people from different cultural/educational backgrounds percieved depth cues in 2D images differently method: south africans were shown 2D drawings - native black people (schooled and unschooled) and europeans ( schooled or unschooled) participants had to say which man the animal was trying to spear. depth cues (height in visual field and relative size) suggest that the spear was being aimed at the antelope not the elephant. results: many believed the spear was being aimed at the elephant. schooled participants were more likely to percieve depth than unschooled participants. white schooled participants were more likely to percieve depth than black schooled participants conclusion: people from different cultural/ educational backgrounds use depth cues differently and have a different perceptual set. this supports gregorys theory as it shows that depth cues are learned
29
evaluate the study of culture affecting perception
one weakness is that the instructions may lack sense. the language barrier means that translations may have been unclear. this therefore lowers the validity of the results another weakness is that some of the participants may have been confused seeing the drawings on paper. when more familiar materials such as cloth were used they gave different answers. this shows representation affects the results.
30
what is perceptual set and emotion
the tendency for our brain to notice things that are exciting, interesting or unusual. but block things that make us anxious or we find threatening
31
describe the study that emotion affects perception
aim: McGinnies wanted to see whether things that cause anxiety are less likely to be noticed than things that are emotionally neutral method: 8 male and 8 female students were shown some neutral and some offensive / taboo words that flashed on a screen. participants had to say each word out loud. the amount of emotional arousal was measured through their galvanic skin response (GSR) results: participants took longer to say offensive words than neutral ones. taboo words produced bigger changes in the GSR than neutral words conclusion: this shows that emotion affects perceptual set. perceptual defense is used by the brain when dealing with words that cause offence or anxiety
32
evaluate the study of emotion affecting perception
a strength of the study is that it used an objective measurement of emotion. a scientific method was used - the galvanic skin response - to test biological anxiety responses. this produces results that are less biased than for example rating scales. a weakness of rhe study is that delayed recognition may be due to embarrassment. participants may have hesitated in giving their response as they were uncomfortable repeating words in the study. this suggests awkwardness may have been an extraneous variable. another weakness of the study is that the results are contradictory. sometimes perceptual defence occurs but sometimes it doesnt. but we do not know why. this makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions
33
describe the study of motivation affecting perception
aim: gilchrist and nesburg aimed to find out if food deprivation affects the perception of food pictures. method: two groups of students : one deprived of food for twenty hours, and one not hungry (control group) students were shown four slides of meals. the slide was shown for 15 seconds. the picture was then shown again, but the participants had to adjust the lighting to what it was before- as the picture was shown to be dimmer. results: participants perceived the food as brighter if they were deprived of food. the control group did not perceive the images of food to be brighter conclusion: being deprived of food increased perceptual sensitivity. this shows that hunger is a motivating factor annd affects the way food is percieved
34
evaluate the study of motivation affecting perception
a strength of the study is that similar studies have found similar results. sanford deprived participants of food and showed them ambigious pictures. the longer the food deprivation, the more likely they were ro see food. this incrases the validity of gilchrist and nesburgs results. a weakness of the study is that it is unethical. this is because depriving participants of food and water could lead them to feel uncomfortable. this is an issue as you should not do this in psychological research. another weakness of the study is that it does not relate to everyday life. participants were asked to judge pictures of food rather rhan real food. rhis makes the results harder to apply to the real world.
35
describe the study of expectation affecting perception
aim: bruner and minturn aimed to find out whether an ambigious figure was seen differently if the context of the figure was changed method: an independent groups design was used where participants were either presented with a sequence of letters or a sequence of numbers with the same ambigious figure in the middle. the ambigious figure could either be seen as the number 13 or the letter B results: those who saw a sequence of letters were more likely to report the figure as being the letter B. if shown numbers they were more likely to see the number 13. conclusion: this shows that expectation of what the figure represented was affected by the context the figure was presented in
36
describe the relationship between perceptual set and motivation
the force which drives your behaviour (motivation) can affect how you perceive things. wanting something can increase its attractiveness
37
evaluate the study of expectation affecting perception
one weakness of the study is that it used an artificial task. an ambiguous figure is designed to trick perception. this means the results lack validity. another weakness relates to the fact there may have been individual differences in participants within the groups. this is because an independent groups design was used. this is an issue as differences in participant variables may have caused differences in perception rather than expectation- which is an extraneous variable.