Perception Flashcards
-Evolution -Audition -Vision (203 cards)
What is evolutionary anachronism?
• Evolutionary anachronism- attribute of living species best explained as a result of having been favourably selected in the past due to coevolution with other biological species that have since become extinct
Who should we compare ourselves to when looking at human cognition and why?
• When looking at cognition, we shouldn’t compare ourselves to computers or gods, but to animals because we are animals
o We have the same ancestors as animals
o Understanding ourselves means looking at the antecedents of our parts and processes in our ancestors
o Our ancestors evolved to win competitions
o Darwin suggests that we are no different from animals, as any cognitive ability we have is in some shape of form also in lower animals
Have we evolved from modern monkeys?
o We have common ancestors with modern monkeys, we haven’t evolved from modern monkeys
What is the problem of studying animals for human cognition?
Can’t look at animals today as we haven’t evolved from them, and ancestral monkeys we have evolved from are dead
What is a primary adaptation?
• Primary adaptation- original adaptations
What is a vestigial adaptation?
• Vestigial- Was an adaptation for the organism’s ancestor, but evolved to be non-functional because the organism’s environment changed
What is an exaptation?
• Exaptation-Trait that has been co-opted for a use other than the original adaptational use due to a difference in environment
What is a secondary adaptation?
• Secondary adaptation-enhances the exaptation function
Describe the adaptation and vestiges of the human spine
o For example, the spine
Coccyx and tailbone- tail useful in trees to grasp branches
Curved spine- shock absorber for walking
Spine exapted to hold us up
Secondary adaption to improve shock absorbance
What type of adaptation is piloerection for humans?
o For example, piloerection
Good for animals with spines, but vestigial for us
What is the blink reflex (reactions and purpose)
o For example, the blink reflex
A bright light suddenly shone into the eyes, a puff of air upon the sensitive cornea or a sudden loudnoise will produce immediate blinking of the eyes
Purpose- to protect the eyes from foreign bodies and bright light
May be associated tensing of the neck muscles, turning of the head away from the stimulus, frowning and crying
Is our brain made for modern uses?
• Most (99%) of our brain was made to suit the needs of our animal ancestors, not what we’re trying to do with it now- evolution is slow
In what ways is animal psychology and human psychology percieved differently?
o Animal psychology Foraging and food choice Predator avoidance Mate choice and courting Communication o Human psychology Perception Cognition Intelligence Language
Describe the bag of tricks metaphor for our brains and why it is useful
• Bag of tricks metaphor-
o Computer metaphors are used a lot for cognition, but we should not be looking at computer metaphors as computers can do a lot of general things- we can only do specific ones
o We have a specific collection of tools/cognitive faculties
o Bag of tricks has more animal perspective
o Big concepts are not a useful unit for analysis
• Question of what cognition evolved for may be too general
What are the 4 types of explanation for a phenomenon?
- Proximate explanation-closest explanation to the event that is to be explained
- Developmental explanation
- Neuroscientific explanation
- Functional evolutionary explanation
What is the central interest of evolutionary psychology?
o Evolutionary psychology is interested in which, and how many, behaviours and mental processes, evolved as the result of specific issues that our ancestors faced
What are barriers to people accepting functional evolutionary explanations?
o Barriers to the functional evolutionary explanation
People think they are more like gods than animals
Lack of understanding of evolution
Belief that human qualities are not qualities animals have -> tend to identify with higher cognitive abilities that we believe animals don’t have
In modern times, is the mentality that we are far away from animals cognitively increasing or decreasing?
• However, this mentality is decreasing in some instances and increasing in others
o There is greater acceptance of similarity of animals to ourselves- when people are vegan or vegetarian for ethical reasons
o Feminism is not animalistic-due to our history and culture, we want to close the gap between man and woman whilst in terms of the animal kingdom, there is a large difference between the two sexes
How can we find if something is innate rather than learned?
• To find if something has evolved or is learned, need to examine something important in our ancestral environments, but not so important in the environment of kids and adults today, so that a special response to it is unlikely to be learned
Describe New, Cosmides and Tooby 2007 study, as well as potential confounds
o Animals were very important for almost all humans and their ancestors, until very recently (when we started living in species)
o Animals are especially important to keep track of (prey and predators), so arguably should be attended to more
o If evolutionary demands shaped specific aspects of attention, then attention should be spontaneously directed to animals more
o New, Cosmides and Tooby 2007 study
Change blindness study
If evolutionary history dictates what we turn our attention to, then images with changes involving subjects should be detected in this hierarchy
• People
• Animals
• Plants
• Moveable/manipulable artifacts designed for interaction with human hands/body
o Brain is responsive to tools
• Fixed artifacts construable as topographical landmarks
o Important for navigation but don’t expect these things to move
Results of upright condition-
• People and animals had a significant detection advantage- attention was drawn towards them when they changed
Confounds-
• Backgrounds, locations, visual features, color differences, texture differences, spatial frequency differences of the target are changed between pictures
To address confounds, did inverted conditions
• Found that people and animal advantage was removed
Hence can conclude that confounds not reason that people and animals drew increased attention from subjects
Describe the New and German 2015 study as well as potential problems with it
o New, German 2015 study-
In an evolutionary psychology view, should be less susceptible to things that are real threats now if it was learned rather that evolved
Claimed that spiders can surmount inattentional blindness by using different spider shapes and comparing them to needles
Inattentional blindness model
Found that only the certain spider shapes had a detection advantage over non-spider shapes, except for the flower shape which puts in question the results
There is a problem with these results as we don’t know what visual features the brain responds to the most
This experiment was also done on adults, so the innateness of spider detection is questionable-do we learn to be afraid of spiders due to our cultural education or is it innate
Describe which part of the brain is extremely responsive to faces
• Part of temporal lobe (fusiform gyrus) extremely responsive to faces
Describe the Kanwisher, Chun and McDermott (1997) experiment on facial recognition
• Experiment- Kanwisher, Chun, McDermott (1997)
o Showed faces to people and would look at responsiveness in the brain compared to other objects such as hands or other visually similar objects (to control for visual features)
o Scrambled stimuli as a control condition with the intention of preserving the visual features
So stimuli were arranged as a face vs not face but using the exact same shapes
But maybe manner in which stimulus was broken up disrupted visual feature that the brain area cared about
o Larger responses to faces in all conditions
Describe why inversion is a better design than scrambling to eliminate visual feature bias
• Inversions of something makes it harder to recognise them as an object (although visual features are maintained and no disruption occurs)-less confounds than scrambling features
• Inverting photos perfectly preserves their lower- level stimulus properties but makes identifying the semantic category to which a target belongs more difficult
o The low level stimulus properties (colours, textures, shapes) are still processed very similarly but the system no longer easily recognises what is a person and what is an animal
o With the system not recognising the people and animals as people and animals in the inverted case, it is therefore no longer predicted that the people and animals should have an advantage
• If lower level properties are causing the animate attention advantage, then it should appear even when photos are inverted. In contrast, if the attentional bias is category-driven, then manipulations that interfere with categorization but preserves lower-level perceptual features should eliminate the animate change-detection advantage