Perceptual Development Flashcards
Week 3 (48 cards)
Why is it important to study perceptual development?
- understand how infants/children experience the world
- individual differences
- comparison
What are the 3 trajectories of Aslin’s perceptual develpment diagram? What is an example of each trajectory?
Undeveloped trajectory
* No development in a system until the onset of experience
* Onset of experience can either have no effect or can induce development of a system
* Example: William James environmental/learning = induction as nothing from nature that predetermines ability (all nurture)
Partially developed trajectory
* Leans towards nature argument
* Genetic driver leading the system to be set up
* Onset of experience leads to 3 options in system:
1. Attunement or facilitation: for exposure to environmental experience and how system is operating
1. Maintenance: continues as is
1. Loss: possess ability but aren’t exposed to environment that enables ability/needs ability
* example: Ethological Gibsonian theories - nature and nurture
Fully developed trajectory
* Maintenance
* Loss: something lacking in environment preventing maintenance of skill
* example: face processing - all nature
What are the details of William James’ Environmental/learning theory of perceptual development? What are the critiques of this theory?
Stimuli originally meaningless sensory input meaning learnt through interactions and building associations
Critiques of theory
* Large amount of time/effort required to learn this way – lacks efficiency
* Fails to note how we view before meaning is applied ie why are we interacting with it if it has no meaning to us?
What are the 2 types of ethological/Gibsonian theories of perceptual development? Explain each and how they are related to Aslin’s model of perceptual development.
Overall: Perceptual system pre-set to learn about most important things in environment
Experience-expectant learning
* Biologically biased to attend to critical aspects of environment e.g. faces, danger signals
* Neural circuitry is rapidly tailored to environmental input during critical or sensitive periods
* Neural pruning – removal of non critical information
Experience dependent learning
* Ongoing neural and behavioural plasticity in response to environmental input
* Occurs outside sensitive periods
* May be more gradual or subtle
* Occurs via synaptic connections (rather than neural pruning)
* e.g. learning language as a child vs as an adult
What is perceptual narrowing and why is it thought to happen? What evidence is there for this process?
Neural architecture is initially untuned and then tuned by environmental input
* No need to keep unused abilities
* Critical or sensitive periods
* done for efficiency of cognitive processing
* e.g. kitten studies w/ sensory deprivation for vision
What is neural pruning and how does it impact neural development?
Neural pruning = removal of non-critical information
Impact on development
* Prior to pruning (0-2YO) chaotic and inefficient neural connections which results in a more global experience of input
* Pruning thought to occur from 1-13YO
* results in mature connections being organised and precise leading to improved efficiency in neural connectivity
What are the challenges of measuring perception in infants?
- no language
- must rely on other measures (behaviour, neural, psychophysiological e.g. HR)
- meaning inferred as indirect measures of perceptual processing
What are 3 examples of behavioural measures of infant perception?
- Natural looking (infants vs adults) (e.g. how face is scanned)
- Exploratory behaviour (e.g. how objects held)
- Reaching or other gestures
- Facial expressions (e.g. positive or negative)
- Vocalisations (not words but other noises)
- Habituation-Dishabituation
- Preferential looking
What did Walle & Campos’ (2014) study on infant responses to normal vs exaggerated fear expressions demonstrate about measuring infant perception?
Multiple ways to measure infant perception
* focused on facial expression interpretation as to whether real/fake
Explain the habituation-dishabituation paradigm. What is this paradigm used to infer?
Measuring looking times at novel vs habituated stimlus
Thought to measure whether infant can tell the difference between 2 stimuli
What is the preferential looking paradigm and what is it thought to infer?
- Technique for studying infant vision
- Measuring preference for 1 stimuli over the other
- inferring meaning that they must be able to tell the difference in order to show a preference
What are 2 common neurological measures of infant perception?
- EEG (most common)
- fMRI (starting to be used)
How is vision thought to develop in infants?
- Last sense to develop
- Eye-movement in utero but minimal visual stimulation
- Rely heavily on visual info in 1st few weeks of life = rapid development in ability
What is newborn scanning?
- Non-random scanning of world
- Preference for figure over background and high contrast features
How does colour preferance in infants compare to adults? How is this preference measured?
- Prefer blue/purple - matches adult preferences worldwide
- Preferential looking paradigm
- Unable to tell reasoning behind preference
How is object perception in regards to size constancy measured in infants?
- Peekaboo experiment – measuring size constancy abilities
- Trained to look at object same as retinal size
What preference to infants show for illusory contours of objects?
show preference for ‘correct’ samples
How does depth perception develop in infants?
Kinetic cues 1-3 months
* Motion parallax -> closer objects appear to move faster
Binocular depth cues 4-6 months
* Relies on sensitivity to differences between images seen by left and right eyes
Pictorial cues 7months
What is a practical example of visual development in infants? How is our knowledge of infant/child depth perception used in the real world?
Practical example: looming
* Objects get larger as they travel closer
* Even older children (up to 11YO) have trouble detecting looming at >50km/h
* Especially if the child is moving or not looking directly at the car
* See applications in road rules and teaching to kids
What is the visual cliff experiment and what does it show about infant perception?
- Babies refusing to go to mothers when perceive visual cliff
- Infants can’t determine that cliff is an illusion and perceive as an actual drop
- Demonstrates role of non-verbal communication to determine child’s behaviour in uncertain contexts
What is the evidence showing humans have a preference for faces from birth? What measures are used in these studies and what are the limitations of them?
Evidence:
* Track upright faces more so than scrambled or inverted faces 9 mins after birth
* Can tell mother from other females by 4 days (remove scent and other senses)
* Can discriminate novel faces by 3MO - also some evidence we can discriminate by 3 days (front views)
Measure
* Preferential looking used
Limitations
* might not be preference for faces might be for characteristics key to faces e.g. upright, symmetrical
* Can’t tell us whether infants can tell between different identity faces
How is habituation-dishabituation used to measure whether infants can recognise identity faces?
Logic: same identity shown at different angle, if no response shows know same person
Measure:
Different ID shown at different angle = increased looking time as recognition of new person/novel stimuli
What is the evidence that faces are special for adults?
holistic processing
* disproportionate inversion effect
* part/whole effect (face parts better recognised in original context)
* composite effect (gold standard) - 2 halves of face perceptually integrated giving illusion of new person - more time spent looking at misaligned faces showing holistic processing
Fusiform facial area (FFA)
* thought to be region specifically for face processing
N170
* thought to be ERP that measures face processing
Is it thought that infants show special face processing abilities? What evidence supports this?
Yes:
* Discrimination of novel faces at 3 days for upright faces only
* Preference for attractive faces at 1 weeks for upright faces only
* Thatcher illusion at 6MO - When faces inverted we have trouble determining whether differences between them
* 6-8MO treat a face where features have been combined from 2 previously seen faces as new only if shown upright