Performance, Modification, and Excuse (MBE) Flashcards Preview

Contracts > Performance, Modification, and Excuse (MBE) > Flashcards

Flashcards in Performance, Modification, and Excuse (MBE) Deck (52):
1

What is The Preexisting Duty Rule?

Coverage?

A promise to increase compensation for duties already owed under an existing contract is unenforceable because there is no consideration

 

Common law contracts

2

Exceptions to the Preexisting Duty Rule

(2)

1. Mutual Modification

2. Unforseen Circumstances

3

Mutual Modification Requirements?

Effect?

Coverage?

1)   Both parties agree to a performance that is different from the original contract; and,           

2)         Difference is not a mere pretense

 

then, A promise to increase compensation under an existing contract is enforceable as a mutual modification 

Common Law only

4

Unforseen Circumstances Requirements?

Effect?

Coverage?

The preexisting duty rule will not apply if:

                                                                                                                  A promise of increase compensation because performance has been rendered substantially more burdensome than reasonably anticipated

Common Law only

5

Modification requirements under the UCC

an agreement modifying an existing contract for the sale of goods needs no consideration as long as it is made in good faith

6

Seller's Obligation under the UCC

transfer and deliver the goods

7

Buyer's Obligation under the UCC

accept and pay for the goods

8

What are carrier cases

when the parties to a contract agree to use a common carrier 

9

What are Non-carrier cases 

Apply when the parties do not agree to use a common carrier

10

In non-carrier cases, when does the risk of loss pass?

(1)   If seller is not a merchant:

Risk of loss passes to buyer upon tender of delivery

(2)   If seller is a merchant:

Risk of loss passes when the goods are physically in the buyer’s possession 

11

In carrier cases, when does the risk of loss transfer?

(1)   Critical distinction:

(a)   Shipment contract: seller promises to turn goods over to the carrier

Risk of loss passes to buyer once the goods are delivered to the carrier.

(b)   Destination contract: the seller promises to tender delivery at a particular destination point

Risk of loss passes to the buyer when the goods are tendered to the destination point.

12

When will Unilateral Mistake excuse performance?

(a)   Defined: a single party operating under a faulty assumption about a material fact at formation    

(b)   The rule: A single party mistaken is not excused                                                                    

1)   Exception #1: Mistake excused if other party knew or had reason to know the other party’s mistake            

13

When will a Mutual Mistake excuse a contract?

1)   The mistaken assumption relates to material facts;                                              

2)   The mistake is made by both parties; and,                                                            

3)   The disadvantaged party did not bear the risk of mistake

14

When will impossibility excuse both parties from a contract?

Requirement #1: The impossibility must be objective

Requirement #2: The impossibility was not known at formation

15

In what circumstances are we likely to find objective impossibility?

(3)

Circumstance #1: Where the subject matter of the contract is destroyed

 

Circumstance #2: where there is a personal service contract and the performing party has died or become incapacitated

Circumstance #3: When supervening law renders performance legally impermissible

16

Objective impossibility occurs: where 

the performance is literally impossible for anyone because of circumstances beyond the control of the parties        

17

When will the doctrine of impracticability excuse perofrmance?

(a)   The contingency causing the impracticability was unforeseen; and,                              

(b)   The increase in the cost of performance is far beyond what either party anticipated

18

UCC cases where impracticability has been found typically involve (3)

Shortages cause by war or embargo

Crop failure

Unforeseen shutdown of major sources of supply

19

When will doctrine of frustration of prupose excuse performance?

Requirement #1: It must be parties principal purpose of entering the contract is frustrated

Requirement #2: The frustration was substantial in nature. Big frustration, total frustration

Requirement #3: The non-occurrence of the frustrating event, must have been a basic assumption

20

When will Rescission exclude performance

both parties to a contract are mid-performance.  Consideration is provided by the discharge of the other’s duties

21

When will Accord & Satisfaction excuse performance

The parties may make an accord, which is: a contract under which the obligee promises to accept substituted performance in satisfaction of the obligor’s existing duty

 

When obligor performs accord, then there is satisfaction.

22

When is an Accord Valid?

(a)   where the accord involves an agreement for partial or substituted performance: the substituted performance differs significantly from the original performance or it’s obligation is doubtful à cannot be a pre-existing duty.

                                                                                                                 

(b)   where the accord involves an agreement for partial payment: there is a good faith or bonafide dispute about the amount owed. 

23

When may a contract be anticipatoryly repudiated?

a.   a party’s definitive statement indicating it will commit a breach of contract;                                

b.  a party’s voluntary act that renders the party unable to perform its contractual obligations

24

When can a party request an assurance of performance

If anticipatory repudiation cannot be established but there are: reasonable grounds for insecurity, the insecure party can make a demand for adequate assurance of performance.

25

When can a party suspend performance due to insecurity? 

(1)   Upon making a demand for assurances, a party with reasonable grounds for insecurity may suspend his own performance so long as it is commercially reasonable to do so.

(2)   The failure to respond with reasonable assurances constitutes a repudiation by the non-responding party. This can occur where the other party:

(a)   Does not respond to the demand within a reasonable time (30 days under the UCC)       

(b)        Does not respond in a way that provides reasonable assurances

26

Rights of the Aggrieved Party upon Repudiation

(3)

(1)   The aggrieved party can cancel the contract and terminate all obligations under the contact;              

(2)   The party can bring an action for damages or specific performance; and,                                        

(3)   The party can ignore the repudiation and continue under the contract

27

When can a repudiation no longer be retracted?

(3)

A party who has made an anticipatory repudiation to the other party may retract the repudiation unless and until the other party:

(1)   acts in reliance upon the repudiation;                                            

(2)   accepts the repudiation by signaling their acceptance to the breaching party; or                             

(3)        commences a suit for damages or specific performance

28

Express versus Implied Conditions?

 

Failure can excuse performance in...

(1)   Express conditions: Those conditions that are expressly included in the contract as conditions                  

(2)   Implied conditions are: A fiction employed by the courts to deal with the potential effects of breaches of contract

 

Common Law contracts

29

Failure of an express condition will . . . 

discharge the party’s obligation to perform

30

When do failed express conditions not discharge performance?

(3)

1. Waiver: The party who has been discharged by the failed condition, may waive that right and perform anyway

2. Bad Faith Conduct: when a party acts in bad faith as to prevent the condition, his conduct will not be discharged.

3. Gross Forfeiture: Courts will excuse a performance obligations so as to avoid a grossly disproportionate loss for a relatively minor infraction.

 

 

31

Implied conditions fall into two categories

Material Breach 

 

Sbustantial Performance

32

When is an implied condition a material breach?

What is the effect?

If the breach is serious enough, performance is so bad, the court will treat the breach in the same way it would treat a failure of an express condition. This is called: material breach

      - Particular application in construction contracts

- The aggrieved party is discharged from his own performance obligations

33

When has the implied condition been substantially performed?

Effect?

If the breach is less serious, the court will treat the party’s performance as “close enough,” meaning that the party has rendered: substantial performance

The aggrieved party will not be discharged from his own performance obligations

34

Five factors used to distinguish between material breach and substantial performance.

i)    the extent to which the aggrieved party will be deprived of the benefit that she reasonably expected to receive under the contract;

ii)   the extent to which the aggrieved party can adequately be compensated via damages for the defective performance;

iii)  the extent to which the breaching party will suffer forfeiture if a material breach is found;

iv) the likelihood that the breaching party will cure his failure; and

v)  the extent to which the breach was willful or in bad faith rather than merely negligent or innocent.

35

Where a condition has failed and performance cannot be excused, what other methods of enforcement available to mitigate the consequences for the breaching party.

1. Divisibility of the Contract

2. Quantum Meruit

 

Common Law

36

Performance obligations when there is a failed condition in a divisible contract. 

The legal test for “divisibility” of the contract:  The contract is easily apportioned into agreed equivalents

Excused for the divisible part that is breached but not for the other portions.

37

Divisibility of the Contract and Quantum Meruit allow for which party to recover?

The breaching party

 

Common Law

38

Quantum Meruit

 

Applies?

Effect?

Where a party failed to fulfill an express condition or is in material breach, he may still be able to recover in quantum meruit:

i)   The breaching party may recover the reasonable value of the benefits conferred.                                                                                                   

ii)    However, such recovery will be reduced by the damages caused by his breach of contract.

39

Failure of a condition in the UCC

Under the perfect tender rule, the terms of a contract for the sale of goods are enforced exactly. Every contract term is thus treated as an express condition, and a breach by seller will relieve the payment obligation of the buyer.

40

UCC: Seller is in breach of the contract if

the goods fail in any respect to conform to the contract

41

What is the perfect tender rule?

Under the perfect tender rule, in the UCC, the terms of a contract for the sale of goods are enforced exactly. Every contract term is thus treated as an express condition, and a breach by seller will relieve the payment obligation of the buyer.

42

Buyer's options if UCC seller fails to make a perfect tender

(3)

1. Reject Goods

2. Accept Goods

3. Accept Part and Reject Part

43

For a buyer to reject goods, the buyer must

 

...the buyer may then

 

If non compliant?

a)   For a buyer to reject the goods, the buyer must: Exercise the right of rejection within a reasonable time + notify seller               

b)   Once a buyer rejects the goods, the buyer may: Sue for damages; unless, cure applies                                                         

c)   If the buyer does not effectuate rejection in the manner specified above, then he has made a failed rejection, which:

Is a deemed acceptance of the goods by the buyer

44

How does a buyer's acceptance of seller's goods occur?

buyer has had a reasonable opportunity to inspect the goods + signifies acceptance through:

i)   Stating to the seller that the goods conform to the contract;                 

ii)   Taking the goods despite their nonconformance;                          iii)  Failing to make an effective rejection; or,                                        

iv)  Taking any action inconsistent with seller’s ownership.

45

What are the legal consequences of the buyer’s acceptance of the seller's goods?

(2)

i)   the buyer must:

Pay the contract price of those goods                                               

ii)   the buyer may also:

Seek damages for any non-conformity if seller is notified

46

If the buyer accepts part of the seller's goods and rejects part, the buyer can only do so in terms of 

commercial units of the good (cannot accept 1/2 a unit)

47

When does a seller of goods have the right to cure?

If a seller makes a non-conforming tender, but time for performance remains under the contract, then the seller may cure

 

UCC

48

What are the requirements of Seller's right to cure?

i)   Seller must give buyer reasonable notice; and,                                         

ii)   Seller must cure by the contract deadline

49

How can a seller of goods overcome breach of perfect tender?

1. Right to cure

2. Show reasonable grounds to believe delivery was acceptable

3. Proof of Reasonable grounds by seller

50

When can a seller of goods assert reasonable grounds to believe delivery was acceptable?

 

Requirements?

After the deadline for performance under the contract

Two requirements:

i)   Seller must give buyer seasonable notice of intention to cure;                    

ii)   Seller must cure within a reasonable time

51

How can a seller of goods prove that he had reasonable grounds to believe that the buyer would accept nonconformity

evidence of:

i)   express assurances to that effect from the buyer; or,                         

ii)         trade usage, course of dealing, performance 

52

 If an installment contracts and a non-conforming tender, there are three possibilities that the UCC deals with:

a)   If the non-conforming tender substantially impairs the value of the whole contract: there is a breach of the whole contract and it can be canceled                   

b)   If the non-conforming tender substantially impairs the value only of this particular installment: the buyer can reject the installment but cannot cancel the entire contract          

a)     If the non-conforming tender does not even substantially impair the value of this particular installment: The buyer must allow the seller the opportunity to cure