Phenomenology & Hermeneutics Flashcards

Husserl, Gadamer, Heidegger (85 cards)

1
Q

Exegesis

A

(from the Greek “to lead out”) is a critical
explanation / interpretation of the Bible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Exegesis focused

A

on the written text

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hermeneutics is

A

a “classical discipline concerned
with the art of understanding texts.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Typological reading

A

g interprets Old Testament events
as prefiguring the New Testament events.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

A typological theory of poetry…

A

rests on the idea that
great poems are not random in structure, but are
both meaningful and purposeful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Scripture operates on four levels of meaning.

A

1) literal (or historical); 2)
te allegorical; 3) tropological (or moral); and
4) anagogical (from Greek anagoge, meaning
“elevation, spiritual or mystical
enlightenment”).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the literal or historical level refers

A

to the event
itself;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the allegorical level relates

A

the literal event to
events in the New Testament;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

the moral level refers to

A

the fate of the individual
soul;

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

the anagogical level refers to

A

universal history
and eschatology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Modern hermeneutics, as a theory of
interpretation

A

has its philosophical roots in
phenomenology.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Phenomenology is

A

a school of philosophy which
studies the world’s phenomena as perceived by
the consciousness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Phenomenology is concerned

A

with the
examination of consciousness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Husserl

A

developed
phenomenology as a
philosophical method. The phenomenological
premise questions
our assumptions
about the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Phenomenology is the study of

A

the essential
structures of experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Husserl was interested in

A

what makes our
experience, our knowledge of objects possible,
what makes the necessary presuppositions of
experience possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Consciousness is

A

intentional (i.e. oriented towards
the world); it is a consciousness of something.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Phenomenology focuses on the issue of

A

perception
(i.e. the relationship between the individual
consciousness and the world).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Intentional consciousness is consciousness in
relation

A

to the Other (e.g. things of the world,
human beings, etc.).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

In phenomenological reasoning

A

consciousness
constitutes the world and the world constitutes
consciousness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Constituting

A

denotes a process in which
consciousness not only reflects creation, but also
participates in it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

The body is a meeting place for

A

self and the Other
(i.e. to be corporeal is to exist with others, to
understand one’s freedom and its limits).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

The Other is also experienced

A

as a bodily manifestation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Phenomenological reduction or epoche

A

Greek
epekhein “to pause, take up a position,” from epi-
“on” + ekhein “to hold.” - i.e. phenomenology
brackets off all preconceived ideas about the nature
of the world, suspends all judgment and simply
seeks to describe objects of experience.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Phenomenology analyses
the immanent consciousness (cf. Formalism and Structuralism approach texts as an immanent structures).
26
Phenomenology suspends objective relations...
and studies intentional, rather than empirical objects.
27
Phenomenological analysis is concerned with
the essences of the human experience of the world, not the existence of things.
28
To understand a phenomenon is to....
understand what is essential and unchanging about it.
29
Phenomenology aims to
return to the world as it is before it is contaminated by either the categories of scientific inquiry or the psychological assumptions of the scientist.
30
Phenomenological reduction
brackets off our assumptions about the world and inquires back into consciousness.
31
Phenomenological determination of meaning
is always tentative, incomplete.
32
Phenomenology is concerned
with possible human experiences by holding universality and particularity in tension.
33
In Derridean terms, phenomenology is logocentric because
it is oriented towards essential meaning.
34
Phenomenological analysis
lays bare the deep structures of the human mind and the phenomena they perceive.
35
Heidegger
Heidegger formulates a hermeneutical ontology.
36
The ontic dimension
is concerned with beings, i.e. entities.
37
Ontology
is the study of Being as such, and it also includes the study of the being through which beings come into question
38
Heidegger reflects on human existence as a
Dasein, man’s actual, historical being-in-the-world, being-there.
39
Dasein
a place where being reveals itself (i.e. man exists by engaging with the world)
40
Heidegger’s philosophy is interested in
what it means to be alive.
41
Reality encompasses both
subject and object.
42
Epoche is unproductive because
man is always engaged in the world.
43
Dasein (man’s being) is
hermeneutical because in it and for it there unfolds the meaning of its being.
44
Dasein is hermeneutical
it interprets both itself and the world.
45
World and Dasein
unfold their meaning in the hermeneutic circle.
46
Language is that which brings the world to being,
the dimension in which human life moves. Dasein participates in language.
47
Human subjectivity unfolds in and through
its intersubjective relations with the world.
48
Consciousness becomes accessible to itself....
only by way of the Other: “consciousness has its meaning beyond itself.
49
Gadamer (1900-2002)
rethinks Heidegger’s ideas. Hermeneutical interpretation shows how understanding takes place within tradition.
50
Gadamer’s hermeneutical approach is
rooted in Heidegger’s observation that understanding is man’s way of being in the world.
51
For Gadamer, hermeneutics is
an unfolding of and reflection on understanding rather than a method of ‘correct’ interpretation.
52
Hermeneutics rethinks
Kant’s ideas about art.
53
Rather than being a ‘purposeless purpose’ that renders aesthetic pleasure, in Gadamer’s reasoning...
art uncovers the truth about the world.
54
Art presents
an autonomous world.
55
Transformation into structure
raises the question of the meaning of representation as “transformation into the true”
56
Interpretation participates in bringing to light
“the event of being that occurs in presentation”.
57
Our interpretation is always historically situated,
thus entailing a horizon.
58
Interpreting always involves
projections and preconceptions.
59
Gadamer shows that the interpreter has a
horizon of understanding which is defined by his or her relation to the past.
60
Interpretation is a process based on
the structures of pre-understanding (cf. Heidegger)
61
In hermeneutics, the anticipation of meaning that shapes the understanding of a text is
rooted not in subjectivity, but in our binding relation to tradition.
62
To understand a text is to understand it as an answer to a question, where the answer leads to another question, etc. Interpretation, thus:
1) explains meaning; 2) claims a certain truth; 3) reconsiders the thing that the text is concerned with.
63
Our understanding of meaning conforms to
the logic of question and answer (i.e. meaning is never static, uniform, or foreclosed).
64
A hermeneutic reading is
a process of question and answer.
65
Understanding is based on that
which can be articulated, can be expressed, i.e. shared with the Other.
66
Gadamer’s hermeneutics brings out
the dimension of trust
67
Understanding is based on
he premise of the possibility of meaning (cf. deconstruction highlights the principle of misunderstanding).
68
The hermeneutic circle
denotes a process of understanding where individual features are intelligible in terms of the entire context, and the entire context becomes intelligible through the individual features.
69
To access the hermeneutic circle adequately
is to illuminate pre-understanding and use it in the course of explanation.
70
The hermeneutic circle is not
a formal structure or a methodological gesture.
71
Isotopy
a term referring to the semantic redundancy in texts (i.e. certain semantic elements are repeated in different variants).
72
The fusion of horizons is
like a form of play in which the participants are absorbed.
73
As a theory of interpretation, hermeneutics
has its roots in medieval exegesis, Husserl’s phenomenology and Heidegger’s philosophy.
74
Phenomenological analysis focuses on
how the world unfolds its essence in the human consciousness through phenomenological reduction.
75
Phenomenology postulates understanding as
an intersubjective relationship between consciousness and the world, the Other.
76
Heidegger has shown that
human interactions with the world are mediated through language.
77
Language has a hermeneutic function because
it is the medium through which the world becomes meaningful to humans.
78
Language is intersubjective
(i.e. language is a place where we meet the Other).
79
All interpretation is
situational, shaped and constrained by the historically relative criteria of a particular culture; there is no possibility of knowing the literary text ‘as it is’.
80
Understanding is productive:
it is always understanding ‘otherwise’, making a difference to the text.
81
Understanding entails a
fusion of the reader’s horizon with that of the text.
82
Interpretation is an unfolding
of the text’s meanings in the course of our dialogue with it.
83
For Gadamer, to understand a text is to
understand it as an answer to a question, where the answer leads to another question etc.
84
Interpretation of a text is a gradual build-up of
understanding within the structure of the hermeneutic circle.
85
The hermeneutic circle is a process of
understanding where individual features are intelligible in terms of the entire context, and the entire context becomes intelligible through the individual features.