PHI 112-Test 3, Part 1-Kant & Deontology Flashcards
(22 cards)
Did Kant want to show rationalist or empiricists that morality was necessary?
Empiricists
What saying can act-intuitionism be compared to?
“Let your conscience be your guide.”
Categorical imperatives call one to fulfill the duty that has…
Intrinsic value
Hypothetical imperatives give one the opportunity to
Do the act that benefits one self
Categorical imperatives call one to fulfill the duty that has…
Intrinsic value (“duty for duty’s sake”)
Explain the following three influences on Kant: Pietism-Rosseau-Rationalism-
Pietism: Honest deep feeling moral life Rosseau: Human freedoms dignity worth Rationalism: Reason tells us how the world is, independent of experience
Even though Kant believes the good will is good without qualification, it can still be put to…
bad use.
Empiricism
The belief that knowledge comes from experience; our minds are empty slates (tabula rasa)upon which experience writes lessons
Intuitionism
Humans have natural faculty that gives us an intuitive awareness of morality
Act-intuitionism
Theory we must consult our moral intuition or conscience in every situation to discover the morally right thing to do (Butler)
Common statement associated with Butler
“Let your conscience be your guide”
Rule-intuitionism
We must decide what is right or wrong in each situation by consulting moral rules that we receive through intuition
Pufendorf’s three duties and Kant’s use of them
Pufendorf: duty to self, others, and God; Kant: moral duty to self and others, but duties to God are religious, not moral
Categorical imperative
This is a moral imperative that is unqualified and does not depend on one’s desires, it is doing one’s duty for duty’s sake. The action is done because it has intrinsic value.
The good will
the only thing absolutely good without qualification
The principle of law of nature
“Act as though the maxim of your action were by your will to become a universal law of nature.”
Remember these two of the four examples of “practical contradiction” Kant gives to back up his theory.
Making a lying promise and committing suicide.
Remember this counterexample to the Principle of Law of Nature:
Prohibiting permissible actions, like flushing the toilet everyday at a certain time as long as it does not effect the plumbing system.
Prima facie duties
(“at first glance”) Duty that is tentatively binding on us until this duty conflicts with another (Ross)
Actual duty
Ross argued this is the stronger of two conflicting duties (it overrides the weaker one in conflict).
How does Ross’ “prima facie duties” and “actual duties” transform the Kantian system of ethics?
It transforms Kant’s absolutism into a modest objectivist system. (Kant would not allow this.)
What are the three formulations of the Categorical Imperative?
The principle of the law of nature, the principle of ends, and the principle of autonomy.