philosophy ethics test Flashcards
(39 cards)
define ethics
the study of morality
- determines which things are morally good and what actions are morally right
- principles of right and wrong behaviour
define morality
- standards that an individual or group has about what is right or wrong good or evil
- set of values and principles that guide someones choices
define moral
that which is goof the way we ought to behave
define immoral
that which is bad the way we ought to not behave
define amoral
those actions which are neither good or bad not but are morally neutral
what are the 4 basic moral principles
- do good avoid evil
- do unto others as you would have done onto you
- does the end justify the means
- follow what natures intendeds
do good and avoid evil
- most basic principle
- first articulated by Aristotle
- agreed by most religions
- all moral principles comes from this
do unto others as you would have done onto you
- commonly referred to as golden rule
- all religions share this belief
- treat others how you want to be treated
Follow what nature intendeds
- make decisions that respect the nature of things
- follow what is natural for human beings and the rest creation
who is Lawerence kholberg? what his theory?
Lawerence kholberg (1927-1987)
- he conclued there are 6 stages of moral reasonings
what are the three levels to kholbergs theory
- pre conventional (childhood) morality
- conventional (adolescent) morality
- post conventional (adult) morality
stage 1 of khohlbergs - punishment and obedience “reward, punishment”
- based actions on consequences
- avoidance of punishment or a gaining a rewards motivates
“I am not going to run a red light because I will get a ticket”
stage 2 of kholbergs theory - personal usefulness “me first”
- what is right is only what satisfies one self
- the needs of others only matter if they affect MY needs
“ill scratch your back if you scratch mine”
” I am not going to run the red light because I need to use the car”
stage 3 - conforming to the will of the group “peer pressure”
- what is moral is what ever pleases and gets approval from the group
- conforms to the standard or norm
- right and wrong depends on what pleases or displeases others
” I am not going to run a red light because my friends expect me to stop and they want to feel safe in my car”
stages 4 - law and order “its your duty” stage
- one sees obedience to make rules as necessary to maintain order
- individuals do not think for themselves
- right behaviour consist of doing ones duty and respecting authority
- legally right = moral right
” I am not going to run a red light because its the law and I respected the law
stage 5 - social contract the “what society stands for”
- right action is described in terms of general values that have been out upon the whole society (charters of rights and freedoms)
- societies standards of behaviour
- laws are justified based on general principles but one may work to change the law for society
stage 6 - personal conscience “its the principle of the thing”
- decisions are based upon universal justice equality respect and dignity
- choices are grounded in genuine moral interests willing to risk punishment for what is right
- willing to accept disproval of others
“sometimes I may chose to run a red light for greater purpose I will admit to breaking the law and accept my punishment”
what are the consequetlist (teleological) theories
- egoism
- hedonism
- utilitarianism
what are the non consequentialism theories (deontological)
- divine command theory
- natural law ethics
- categorical imperative
what’s another word for consequenlist and where does it come from?
teleological
- comes from greek word “telos” for end
what’s another word non consequentialist and where does it come from
deontological
- comes from greek word “deon” for duty
Egoism
- believe that when deciding morality we should consider the good and bad consequences for ourselves
- believes that we act morally when it promotes our long term interest
short term suffering - long terms pleasure
problems w egoism
- conflicting interests
- is moral point of view realistic? no one can be impartial
- underestimates moral point of view
hedonism
- only pleasure is only worthy having its own sake
- short term benefits - long terms suffering