Philosophy Final Flashcards

(55 cards)

1
Q

he ancient philosophers knew there were 4 elements. Name these elements

A

Water
Air
Fire
Earth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which country was home to the activities of the earliest known philosophers?

A

Greece

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the definition of the word ‘Philosophy’?

A

Love of wisdom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Monists believed that the world is composed of:

A

One thing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Anthropomorphism

A

assigning human attributes to non human objects or entities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How did Anaximander believe this element became the other four elements (that is, what caused it to become those four elements)?

A

Entropy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Thales

A

-The first of the monists: Reality is composed of one thing.

-Thales’s assumption: If there is change in the world, there must be
­ something that does not change.

-Thales chooses water as the primary element from which all others are
derived.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Anaximander

A

There must be a hidden abstract element—the “boundless,” the “unlimited”—from which all other elements are derived.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Anaximenes

A

-Air is the fundamental element from which all others are derived.

-The world as it appears to us is composed of air in more or less condensed
or “rarified forms.” (Quality is determined by quantity: more or less air in a
given space.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Pythagoras

A

Number is the fundamental building block of reality.

All explanations must be mathematical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Xenophanes

A

A criticism of the religious views in Greek mythology: On Olympus, the gods
are like very strong, badly behaved, immoral humans.
If there are gods, they don’t look and dress like humans, any more than
they look and dress like cows or lions (attack on anthropomorphism in reli-
gious thought).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Heraclitus

A

-Fire is the basic element from which all other elements derive (or, more
likely, fire is a metaphor for the nature of reality).
-Change is the key feature of reality. (“You can’t step in the same river twice.”)
-Heraclitus is “the Dark One”: His philosophy was interpreted as pessimism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Parmenides

A

The opposite of Heraclitus: Nothing ever changes; motion is an illusion.
Only Being is real, because “nothingness” and “change” are self-contradic-
tory concepts.
Being is uncreated, unchanging, eternal, immovable, indivisible, solid, and
spherical (equally real in all directions).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Zeno

A

Defender of Parmenides’s philosophy using reductio ad absurdum argumen-
tation against Parmenides’s detractors.
Zeno’s paradoxes are proofs that motion and change are impossible.
Overview: In the face of the powerful Parmenides’s revelation of the implica-
tions of monism, either Parmenides’s conclusions will have to be accepted
or monism will have to be abandoned. In the face of the powerful logical
arguments of Zeno, future philosophers who believe in change and motion
will have to explain how these phenomena are possible.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Empedocles

A

The first of the pluralists: Reality is composed of an irreducible plurality of elements.

The “four roots”—fire, air, earth, and water—cannot be reduced to some-
thing more basic.
Motion and change are real, produced by two forces: a positive force (Love)
and a negative force (Strife).
First recorded theory of evolution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Anaxagoras

A

Pluralism continued: Everything produced from “infinite seeds” (replacing
Empedocles’s “four roots”).
Motion and change are caused by Nous (Mind or Reason).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Leucippus and Democritus

A

Pluralism and materialism.

Atomism: The world is composed of “atoms”: invisible, indivisible particles of matter in constant motion traveling in pre-determined paths, colliding,
grouping, and scattering according to rigid natural laws.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

The Sophists

A

Goal: To replace philosophy with rhetoric and the pursuit of truth with the pursuit of rhetorical victory for the power it might bring; to replace
objectivity with subjectivism, objective truth with relativity , and knowledge
with skepticism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Protagoras

A

Relativity: “Man is the measure of all things.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Thrasymachus

A

Power, not law or morality, should be everyone’s goal. Might makes right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Callicles

A

Power, not justice, is good. Power is good for survival. Survival allows
pleasure. Food, drink, and sex are the meaning of life.
Morality is the weapon of the weak masses to shackle powerful individuals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Critias

A

Clever rulers control their subjects by encouraging the fear of non-existent
gods.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Socrates

A

The greatest opponent of the Sophists, challenging them at almost every level.
Socrates’s motto: “The unexamined life is not worth living.”
Socrates queried everybody on every philosophical topic: knowledge, being, truth, meaning, justice, love, beauty, death, etc.
He professed to know nothing, being on a permanent quest for knowledge.
Irony as a tool of analysis.
He became the first
recorded martyr for philosophy.

24
Q

PLATO

A

Plato’s goal in Republic: to establish a complete account of ontology,
epistemology, ethics, social and political philosophy, psychology, and
philosophy of art through a series of dialogues with Socrates as the
spokesman.
Plato’s Main Philosophical Ideas:

Ontology: two main divisions—the “intelligible world” at the top and the
“visible world” below, the latter being a mere copy of the former.
Intelligible world divided into the “Forms” at the top and “Formal
Concepts” below, the latter being a mere copy of the former.

25
Aristotle
Aristotle’s analytical division of objects—but not a real division—in terms of form (the “whatness” of the object) and matter (the “thisness” of an object); a substance is an object with form and matter. Change: * Each substance (e.g., acorns or humans) strives to actualize its potentiality (a teleological explanation of change—a movement toward a goal). The four causes: (a) material, (b) formal, (c) efficient, and (d) final ([b] and [d] are teleological). The Prime Mover: The perfection toward which everything and everyone strives to move, consciously or unconsciously.
26
in order for an individual to be balanced and a city to be just, what do each of the three attributes/societal roles need?
Reason/Ruler-------- Wisdom Spirit/Solider-----------Courage Appetite/Worker----------moderation
27
According to Aristotle, the highest goal (telos) of humans is
Happiness
28
Aristotle’s Golden Mean would identify the virtuous condition between cowardice and foolhardiness.
Courage
29
Epicurus
happiness is pleasure (hedonism), whose understanding requires a theory of desire. True happiness is the fulfillment of necessary, natural desires and the avoidance of vain desire, leading to a calm life of sobriety and simplicity. Pleasure is the absence of pain.
30
Zeno or Citium/Cyprus
Stoicism Freeing oneself from all worldly connections Stoic behaviour: passionless acceptance of whatever comes your way.
31
Skepticism
The skeptics cast doubt on almost all claims to knowledge, restricting knowledge exclusively to the data of the senses, or in some cases, rejecting sensorial knowledge as well. The goal of the rejection of the possibility of knowledge: Ataraxia, unperturbed peace of mind, a particular mental and emotional state involving a suspension of judgmen
32
Augustine
he problem of predestination: Does God’s omniscience entail predestination? If an individual’s future is predetermined, how can the individual be blamed for his sin? Solutions: God is not in time, therefore to say that God knows the future is inaccurate. God’s knowledge does not cause sin. God only punishes sins of free will: If a person can sin, wants to sin, and does sin, that sin is a free act.
33
John Scotus Eriugena
First metaphysical system builder in four centuries. deeply influenced by Neoplatonism. The Divisions of Nature: First method of division: “Things that are” (Platonic Forms) and “Things that are not” (everything else, including God!). Second method of division: (1) God, (2) the Platonic Forms, (3) the physical World, and (4) (again) God. God as Beginning and End, Creator and Goal of creation.
34
Anselm
The ontological argument for God’s existence. If the fool who says in his heart “there is no God” can conceive of God, then God must exist. 1. “Existence is a perfection.” 2. If God lacks existence, he is imperfect. 3. But, by definition, God is all-perfect. 4. Therefore, God exists (by definition). The Platonic features of the ontological proof: The argument is purely a priori (based purely on logic, not on observation).
35
Averroes(MUSLIM) and Maimonides(JEWISH)
Reintroduction of Aristotle Are faith and philosophy compatible, complimentary, or incompatible?
36
Aquinas
Thomas is interested in “natural theology ,” where philosophy and theology overlap. Integrates Aristotelian philosophy to Christianity Thomas traces observable causes and effects to a “first cause”—God. If there were no first cause, there would be no effects at all. Therefore, God’s existence can be logically deduced from observable causes and effects. Proof of God: cosmological
37
William of Ockham
Ockham (Occam)’s Razor: “Plurality is not to be assumed without necessity.” Effect on metaphysics
38
Epistemology is the theory or study of
Knowledge
39
Decartes
Rationalist Copernican revolution (Geocentrism and Heliocentrism) Seeking a foundation for epistemology Radical Doubt Four innate ideas Radical dualism
40
Knowledge based on reason/logic is called
A priori
41
Knowledge based on observation/experience is called
A posteriori
42
Hume attempted to prove Causality, but ran into a problem. What do we call this problem
Inception
43
Spinoza
Discovers a logical error on Descartes’s part which, when corrected, solves the problem of dualism, replacing it with a form of pantheism. Descartes’s error: defining substance as “absolutely independent,” and claiming there are two substances. Spinoza’s correction: There is one substance, God (= nature, = pantheism).
44
Leibniz
Rationalist Reinstitute humanity’s special status Three principles: Identify Sufficient Reason Internal Harmony
45
Hobbes
ny form of civil society is better than the “state of nature.” One escapes the “state of nature” with a “social contract”: Each citizen agrees to surrender her “natural right” to self-protection (right to violence) if all others agree to do the same. Each citizen agrees to transfer his right to violence to the “sovereign”
46
Locke
Empiricist Application of Occam’s Razor Simple and complex ideas Primary and secondary qualities God given rights- ife, liberty, and possessions.” Social contract
47
Berkeley
the whole of human knowledge in terms of sense data and linguistic constructs, replacing “physical substance” with permanent relations among sense data (Ockham’s razor). So-called physical objects are “collections of ideas.” Only God is more than sense data: His esse is not percipi.
48
Hume
Empiricist Analytic - synthetic distinction Causality Priority Contiguity Necessary Connection Hume’s Fork
49
Kant
Synthetic a priori Three faculties of the mind Intuition Understanding Reason Categorical imperative Deontological approach The phenomenal world: the world as known by the human mind, and . . . The noumenal world: the world impenetrable by the human mind.
50
Hegel
Absolute Idealism: The history of the world as the history of ideas. The Dialectic: thesis—antithesis—synthesis Applications of the Dialectic: Metaphysical example: the history of the world begins with God’s dialectical thought of “Being” and “Nothingness” synthesizes into Becoming
51
Schopenhaue
“The world as idea”: We do not directly know ultimate reality; we only know the world as presented to the senses passing through the categories of time, space, and causality (Kant). “The world as will”: hints found in the world as idea that ultimate reality (the noumenal world) is an uncaring, seething, irrational force of reproductive and destructive powers that end only in death.
52
Kierkegaard
The Father of Existentialism Passion, decision, action Objective and subjective thought “...the immediacy and fragility of our existence against the backdrop of eternity.”
53
Marx
Feuerbach as mentor Alienation View on religion View on capitalism The haves and the have nots
54
Nietzsche
Lies as primary language Will to power Ubermensch Slave morality God is dead
55