Physical attractiveness Flashcards

1
Q

What is physical attractiveness?

A

How appealing we find a person’s face - important factor in formation of romantic relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Symmetry

A

People with symmetrical faces are rated as more attractive - signal of genetic fitness

Shackleford and Larsen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

social norms

A

Rapid changes in partner preferences due to changing social norms

Tamas Bereczkei

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Neotenous features - neoteny

A

Baby-face - neotenous features eg widely separated and large eyes, delicate chin and small nose - more attractive - trigger protective or caring instinct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The halo effect

A

Someone that is physically attractive is seen with positive traits
How one distinguishing feature (physical attractiveness) has disproportionate influence on our judgements of a person’s other attributes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Dion - 1972

A

What is beautiful is good
- Physically attractive people consistently rated as kind, strong, sociable and successful compared to unattractive people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Self-fulfilling prophecy

A

Behaving more positively towards people we view attractive so they behave more nicely in return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who came up with the matching hypothesis?

A

Walster and Walster - 1969

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The matching hypothesis

A

We look for partners who are similar to ourselves in terms of physical attractiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Walster et al design?

A

Study to test matching hypothesis called ‘The computer dance’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Procedure of the design?

A

Male and female students invited to dance - rated for physical attractiveness by objective observers and completed questionnaire about themselves
Told data about themselves and information would be used by a computer to decide their partner for evening
Actually paired randomly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Findings?

A

Hypothesis - not supported
Most liked partners - most physically attractive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What did Berschied et al find?

A

Replicated study - each participant was able to select their partner from varying degrees of attractiveness
Participants tended to choose partners who matched them in physical attractiveness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conclusion?

A

Tend to choose partners whose attractiveness matches our own
Choice of partner is a compromise - risk rejection in selecting most attractive people so we settle on those who are in our league physically

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

EVAL - research support for halo effect

A
  • Strength - physical attractiveness associated with halo effect
  • Attractive people rated as more politically knowledgeable and competent
  • Halo effect persisted even when participants knew the person had no particular expertise
  • Implications for politics - dangers for democracy if politicians judged due to being physically attractive
  • Palmer and Peterson
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

EVAL - evolutionary explanation

A
  • Some female features considered attractive across cultures - white hispanic and asian men rated as highly attractive
  • Small nose, large eyes, prominent cheekbones, high eyebrows
  • Cunningham et al
  • What is considered physically attractive consistent across different societies
  • Symmetry is a sign of genetic fitness
  • Makes sense at evolutionary level
17
Q

EVAL - research challenging the matching hypothesis

A
  • Limitation - matching hypothesis not supported by real-world research
  • Taylor et al - studied activity logs of popular online dating site
  • Real-world test - measures actual date choices not just preferences
  • Online daters sought partners who were more physically attractive than them
  • Undermines validity as contradicts central prediction
18
Q

Counterpoint

A
  • Choosing individuals for dating could be considered different situation from selecting partner for romantic relationship
  • Meta-analysis of 17 studies - Feingold
  • Significant correlation in ratings of physical attractiveness between romantic partners
  • Support for matching hypothesis from studies of real-world established romantic partners
19
Q

EVAL - individual differences

A
  • Most of evidence highlights role of physical attractiveness in initial formation of romantic relationships
  • Evidence some people to not attach much importance to attractiveness
  • Touhey - measured sexist attitudes of men and women (MACHO scale)
  • Low scores - relatively unaffected by physical attractiveness when judging the likeability of potential partners