Filter theory Flashcards

1
Q

Filter theory

A

Explanation of relationship formation
Different factors reduce available romantic partners to smaller pool
- All the romantic partners potentially available to us are reduced by a series of filters to a limited collection of people we would like to form a relationship with

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Field of availables

A

Entire set of potential romantic partners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

field of desirables

A

Reduced number after partners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Social demography

A

Includes physical proximity, social class, ethnic group, age and educational level
- Leads to homogamy - forming relationships with people who are socially and culturally similar to ourselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Similarity in attitudes

A

important - especially early in a relationship when such similarities encourage deeper self-disclosures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Kerckhoff and Davis

A

Similarity of attitudes important to develop romantic relationships - only couples less than 18 months - encourages greater and deeper communication and promotes self-disclosure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Byrne

A

Consistent findings that similarity causes attraction - law of attraction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Complementary

A

Meeting each other’s needs becomes more important later in the relationship

Kerckoff And David - Need for complementarity more important for long-term couples - adds depth to relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Research support

A
  • Strength from Kerckhoff and Davis
  • Longitudinal study - both partners in dating couples completed questionnaires to assess two main factors - similarity of values and complementarity
  • Closeness measures by questionnaire seven months later
  • Closeness associated with similarity of values for couples less then 18 months
  • Complementarity predicted closeness for longer relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Counterpoint

A
  • Levinger
  • Studies failed to replicate findings
  • 18 month cut off to distinguish between short and long term
  • Filter theory is undermined by the lack of validity of its evidence base
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Problem with complementarity

A
  • Limitation
  • Markey and Markey - lesbian couples of equal dominance were the most satisfied
  • Their sample of couples had been romantically involved for a mean time of more than 4 1/2 years
  • Similarity of needs rather than complementarity may be associated with long-term satisfaction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Actual versus perceived similarity

A
  • Limitation
  • Actual similarity matters less in a relationship
  • Montoya et al - meta-analysis - actual similarity affected attraction only in short-term lab interactions
  • Real-world relationship - perceived similarity was stronger predictor
  • Perceived similarity may be an effect of attraction and not cause
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Social change

A
  • Demographic factors reduce field of availables - homogamy
  • Role of filters change over time - online dating and apps - location not a big factor
  • Social changes have led to relationships that were less common 30 years ago
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly