Policies relating to social class + deprivation Flashcards
(132 cards)
What are the five policies relating to social class
- Sure Start Centres (New Labour)
- Educational Maintenance Allowance (New Labour)
- Free School Meals (New Labour)
- Early Academies (New Labour)
- Pupil Premium (Coalition)
Policies Relating to Social Class
External Factors
What Statistical Analysis is in the course notes?
Five items
• Middle-class children, on average, perform better than working-class children throughout school.
• They do better at GCSE, stay longer in full-time education and take 80% of university places.
• The gap starts as early as three years old and gets wider as the children get older.
• John Jerrim (2013): Even the most talented children are being left behind in education if they were from a lower-class background.
• High achieving boys from the most advantaged family background are two and a half years ahead of their counterparts from the least advantageous households by the age of fifteen.
What are the three broad categories of external factors that affect differential achievement by social class
- Material Deprivation
- Cultural Deprivation
- Cultural Capital
Describe Material Deprivation
A lack of money and the material necessities that money can buy.
What did Douglas (1964) identify in his study The Home and School?
Five items
- Poor housing conditions e.g. overcrowding: can make study at home difficult
- Poor diet and ill health: may mean tiredness at school, making learning more difficult, more absence, falling behind with lessons
- Low income: may mean lack of educational books and toys at home, no computers available, no money for school trips, sports equipment, calculators
- Part-time jobs e.g. paper rounds or shop work, esp. after 16: may create conflict between competing demands of study and paid work.
- While Douglas conducted his analysis in the 1960s, recent sociological evidence suggests that there are around 4.2 million children living in poverty in the UK, who likely experience similar difficulties.
What did Gibson & Asthana (1999) identify in their study “Cycle of Deprivation”?
Six items
- Poverty affects the educational performance of children.
- Higher levels of sickness in poorer homes that may mean more absence from school and falling behind with lessons.
- Low income may mean that educational books and toys are not bought. There may be a lack of money for out-of-school trips, sports equipment, and other ‘hidden costs’ of free state education.
- Student loans and tuition fees for university is likely to be a source of anxiety to those from poorer backgrounds, deterring them from higher education.
- Schools themselves may suffer disadvantages compared to those in more affluent middle-class areas. E.g. 90% of ‘failing’ schools are located in deprived areas.
- Young people from poorer families are more likely to have part-time jobs, such as paper rounds, babysitting or shop work. This becomes more pronounced after the age of 16, when students may be combining part-time work with school work
Recent Evidence for Material Deprivation
The 2020 A Level exam results fiasco. Discuss.
The 2020 A Level exam results fiasco showed the gap between the materially deprived and materially advantaged still remains. Ofqual’s algorithm that was applied to the centre assessed grades saw students from richer areas predicted grades reduced by 7 percentage points, in the poorer areas this figure doubled to 15 percentage points. Students in the lowest performing schools (often in the most deprived areas) were much more likely to have their results reduced, in some cases by 2 or 3 grades in comparison to the grade awarded by their teacher. (NB – the algorithm was taken away after mass outcry and protests so students did receive their original centre assessed grades. There is a chance that materially deprived students still suffered due to teacher labelling – but this would be an internal factor).
Recent Evidence for Material Deprivation
Working Class children at university. Discuss
W/C children are more likely to drop out of university because of debt problems (16.1% drop out at London Metropolitan – a university with a large working-class intake – compared to 1.5% at Oxford which has a relatively middle class intake).
Recent Evidence for Material Deprivation
Flaherty (2002) Fear of Stigmatisation. What does this study show?
Flaherty (2002): Fear of Stigmatisation. Her study showed that although 20% of students were entitled to Free School Meals, many didn’t take them as they didn’t want to be stigmatised (negatively labelled) as being poor by their peers or teachers.
Recent Evidence for Material Deprivation
Sutton Trust (2010). What did this show about the admissions to university and Material Deprivation?
Sutton Trust (2010): Private school students (7% of school population) are 55 times more likely to get into Oxford or Cambridge and 22 times more likely to get into a high ranked university than state-school students entitled to free-school meals.
Arguments Supporting Material Deprivation
• Marxists would highlight the importance of this factor as evidence for the myth of meritocracy.
• Poverty is closely linked to educational under-achievement. E.g. 90% of ‘failing’ schools are located in deprived areas.
Arguments Against Material Deprivation
• The working class are much better off financially than they were 50 years ago, but the gap in achievement has not decreased. Some people argue that poverty today is not as ‘bad’ as it was 50 years ago (the growing use of food banks and rising numbers of homeless might suggest otherwise though).
• Could be viewed as too deterministic. Some children from poor families do succeed in education. For some children, experiencing material deprivation may be an incentive to work harder so they are not in the same position as their parents in the future.
• Cultural, religious or political values may create and sustain motivation, despite poverty. For example, poor Chinese students do nearly as well as rich Chinese students, showing that cultural factors such as positive attitudes have a greater impact than material factors.
• The quality of the school may play an important part. Poor children who go to grammar schools or are awarded scholarships and bursaries for private schools will obviously have a very different experience to those who attend state schools. This shows that school ethos (an internal factor), must also play a part.
• Cultural deprivation theorists argue that it is the cultural failings and disinterest of working-class parents that leads to class differences, rather than income alone.
What is Cultural Deprivation?
A lack of certain norms, values, attitudes and skills. In the context of education, those necessary for educational success.
Give three examples of cultural deprivation
- Lack of intellectual development
- Poor attitudes & values
- Linguistic deprivation
Arguments Supporting Cultural Deprivation
• We acquire basic values, attitudes and skills needed for educational success through primary socialisation.
• But middle class (m/c) children are socialised into this ‘cultural equipment’ more adequately than working class (w/c) children.
• So w/c children grow up culturally deprived
Describe how Working class children gain a Lack of Intellectual Development
Working class children are deprived of educational books, toys and activities at home that would develop their intellect.
What did Douglas write in 1964 on Lack of Intellectual Development within the Working Class?
Douglas (1964) - W/c parents are less likely to support their children’s intellectual development through educational activities at home (e.g. reading to them).
Melanie Philips wrote The NEETS in 1997. What did this cover on the topic of Lack of Intellectual Development?
• Melanie Philips is a New Right journalist who argues that working class and underclass children lack intellectual development due to ‘family disorder’ and a ‘flight from parenting’.
• She argues that modern Britain is characterised by a rapidly increasing number of broken families in which the effective socialisation of children has become disrupted. She suggests inadequate parenting is more likely to be found in one-parent families, reconstituted families, unmarried families, or where various partners come and go in the family’s lives. This means children lack effective development.
Lack of Intellectual Development.
Attitudes and Values
Barry Sugarman (1970) - Immediate Gratification
What did Sugarman write?
• Barry Sugarman notes that the different occupations of working class and middle class may account for the differing attitudes towards education amongst the children of the two classes.
• Middle class occupations emphasise room for continuous professional advancement, and planning for the future, which encouraged an attitude of deferred gratification, where the middle classes put off enjoyment in order to work hard so it will benefit them in the future.
• Sugarman argued that this is not the case for working class or occupations, as these tend to lack opportunities for career progression. He argued that this fosters an attitude of immediate gratification, where one seeks enjoyment of the moment than sacrificing for future reward.
• This is linked to the concept of fatalism – where the working class accept their situation rather than trying to change it.
• These values are passed onto children, disadvantaging the working-class children in school.
Basil Bernstein (1977) Elaborated vs Restricted Speech Codes
What did he write?
Bernstein argued that ability to use language is key to success at school:
• Reading and understanding books
• Writing clearly
• Ability to explain oneself clearly in speech and writing
If these skills are not developed fully in the family, then children will be at a disadvantage when they enter education.
Basil Bernstein (1977) Elaborated vs Restricted Speech Codes
Bernstein differentiated between two types of language. What are these called?
• Restricted Code
• Elaborated Code
Basil Bernstein (1977) Elaborated vs Restricted Speech Codes
Bernstein differentiated between two types of language.
Define Restricted Code.
• Closed communication that uses a limited vocabulary
• Informal, simple, everyday language, sometimes ungrammatical and with limited explanation and vocabulary
• Cannot be understood easily out of context
• Adequate for everyday use with family or friends because the context is understood by both speakers and so detailed explanation is not required
• Used by both m/c and w/c people, but lower w/c people are mainly limited to this form of language use
Basil Bernstein (1977) Elaborated vs Restricted Speech Codes
Bernstein differentiated between two types of language.
Define Elaborated Code.
• Open communication that uses a wide vocabulary
• Formal, complex language following formal grammar rules and using a wide vocabulary – descriptive and rich
• Can be easily understood out of context
• The sort of language used by strangers and individuals in a formal context, where explanation and detail are required – e.g. teachers in the classroom, writing a business letter, in a job interview
• Used mainly by m/c people
Basil Bernstein (1977) Elaborated vs Restricted Speech Codes
How does familiarity of Elaborated Code improve education?
Their use of elaborated code puts m/c children at an advantage in schools:
- It is the code that is used in schools, in textbooks, writing essays and examination questions and in class discussion
- Its usage develops analytical thinking in a way that the restricted code does not.
- This then means that the w/c are disadvantaged. They are more likely to come into conflict with teachers and not understand academic language.