POLITY Flashcards
(42 cards)
DOES UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION) ACT (UAPA) DEFINE THE WORD TERROR OR TERRORIST?
NO UAPA DOESN’T DEFINE THE WORDS TERROR OR TERRORIST, IT DEFINES A TERRORIST ACT AS ANY ACT COMMITTED WITH INTENT TO THREATEN THE UNITY, INTEGRITY, SECURITY, ECONOMIC SECURITY OR SOVEREIGNTY OF INDIA OR WITH INTENT TO STRIKE TERROR OR LIKELY TO STRIKE TERROR IN THE PEOPLE OR ANY SECTION OF THE PEOPLE IN INDIA OR IN ANY FOREIGN COUNTRY.
FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT (FIU) INDIA IS HEADED BY?
WHOM DOES IT REPORT TO?
FUNCTION?
FIU IS AN INDEPENDENT BODY WHICH REPORTS DIRECTLY TO THE ECONOMIC INTELLIGENCE COUNCIL HEADED BY THE FINANCE SECRETARY.
THE UNIT CAN ENQUIRE THE OFFENDERS ON MATTERS RELATED TO MONEY LAUNDERING.
PROCESS OF INCLUDING OF COMMUNITIES UNDER LIST OF STs?
1 ORIGIN OF PROPOSAL- FROM RESPECTIVE STATES OR UNION TERRITORY GOVERNMENT.
2 PROCESSING BY OFFICE OF REGISTRAR GENERAL OF INDIA- PROPOSAL SENT TO UNION TRIBAL AFFAIRS MINISTRY WHICH SENDS IT TO OFFICE OF REGISTRAR GENERAL OF INDIA (ORGI).
3 ROLE OF NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED TRIBES- IF ORGI APPROVES THE PROPOSAL IS FORWARDED TO THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED TRIBES.
4 APPROVAL BY CABINET- ONLY AFTER THE CONCURRENCE OF THESE INSTITUTIONS, THE PROPOSAL GOES FORWARD TO THE CABINET TO BRING IN THE APPROPRIATE AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION (ST) ORDER, 1950.
5 FINAL DECISION- RESTS WITH PRESIDENT’S OFFICE.
BENEFITS OF INCLUSION OF COMMUNITIES UNDER LIST OF STs?
1 RESERVATION:- IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS UNDER ARTICLE 15(4) OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION.
IN POSTS AND SERVICES UNDER ARTICLE 16(4), 16(4A) AND 16(4B) OF THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION.
2 REPRESENTATION:- RESERVATION OF SEATS FOR STs IN THE LOK SABHA UNDER ARTICLE 330.
RESERVATION OF SEATS FOR STs IN PANCHAYATS ARTICLE 243D.
LOKUR COMMITTEE 1965 IS ASSOCIATED WITH?
IT WAS SET UP TO LOOK INTO CRITERIA FOR DEFINING SCHEDULE TRIBES.
BHURIA COMMISSION (2002-2004) IS ASSOCIATED WITH?
THE BHURIA COMMITTEE (1991) RECOMMENDATIONS PAVED THE WAY FOR THE ENACTMENT OF THE PESA ACT, 1996.
BHURIA COMMISSION (2002-2004) FOCUSED ON A WIDE RANGE OF ISSUES FROM THE FIFTH SCHEDULE TO TRIBAL LAND AND FORESTS, HEALTH AND EDUCATION, THE WORKING OF PANCHAYATS AND THE STATUS OF TRIBAL WOMEN.
XAXA COMMITTEE (2013) IS ASSOCIATED WITH?
THE COMMITTEE WAS MANDATED TO EXAMINE THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC, EDUCATIONAL AND HEALTH STATUS OF TRIBAL COMMUNITIES AND RECOMMEND APPROPRIATE INTERVENTION MEASURES TO IMPROVE THE SAME.
CHAIRMAN OF 16TH FINANCE COMMISSION?
ARVIND PANAGARIYA.
THE POWERS TO ALLOW A CENTRAL AUTHORITY TO CONSTITUTE THE SUPREME COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE (SCLSC) ARE CONFERRED BY?
SECTION 3A OF THE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITIES ACT, 1987.
RULES TO DECIDE THE NUMBER, EXPERIENCE, AND QUALIFICATIONS OF THE SCLSC ARE DEALT BY?
RULE 10 OF THE NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY (NALSA) RULES, 1995.
CHAIRMAN AND OTHER MEMBERS OF SUPREME COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE ARE NOMINATED BY?
CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA WHO SHALL ALSO APPOINT THE SECRETARY TO THE COMMITTEE.
MEMBERS OF SUPREME COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE?
UNDER RULE 10 OF THE NALSA RULES, THE SCLSC SHALL CONSIST OF NOT MORE THAN NINE MEMBERS, INCLUDING EX OFFICIO MEMBERS SUCH AS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR INDIA ; JOINT SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MINISTER OF LAW AND JUSTICE; ADDITIONAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EXPENDITURE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, OR HIS NOMINEE AND THE REGISTRAR GENERAL OF THE SC.
NEW RULES FOR ALLOCATION OF SYMBOLS TO REGISTERED UNRECOGNIZED POLITICAL PARTIES (RUPPs)?
1 AUDITED ACCOUNTS OF THE LAST THREE FINANCIAL YEARS.
2 EXPENDITURE STATEMENTS OF LAST TWO ELECTIONS.
3 SIGNATURE OF THE AUTHORIZED OFFICE BEARER OF THE PARTY ARE NEEDED FOR ALLOCATION OF SYMBOLS.
AFTER FURNISHING THESE DETAILS, RUPPs WILL BE ELIGIBLE FOR CONCESSION OF COMMON SYMBOL ALLOTMENT.
WHAT ARE REGISTERED UNRECOGNIZED POLITICAL PARTIES (RUPPs)?
RUPPs ARE EITHER NEWLY REGISTERED PARTIES OR THOSE WHICH HAVE NOT SECURED ENOUGH PERCENTAGE OF VOTES IN THE ASSEMBLY OR GENERAL ELECTION TO BECOME A STATE PARTY, OR THOSE THAT HAVE NEVER CONTESTED ELECTIONS AFTER BEING REGISTERED.
REQUIREMENT FOR ALLOCATION OF SYMBOLS?
COMMON SYMBOLS ARE PROVIDED TO RUPPs (REGISTERED UNRECOGNIZED POLITICAL PARTIES) BASED UPON AN UDERTAKING THAT THEY WOULD PUT UP AT LEAST 5% OF TOTAL CANDIDATES WITH REGARD TO SAID LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY ELECTION OF A STATE.
CAN FLOOR TEST BE USED AS A MEDIUM TO RESOLVE INTERNAL PARTY DISPUTES OR INTRA PARTY DISPUTES?
NO FLOOR TEST CANNOT BE USED AS A MEDIUM TO RESOLVE INTERNAL PARTY DISPUTES OR INTRA PARTY DISPUTES SAID THE SUPREME COURT IN A JUDGEMENT OF 2023 AGAINST GOVERNOR OF MAHARASHTRA TO CALL FOR A FLOOR TEST.
SUPREME COURT JUDGEMENT IN SR BOMMAI CASE (1994) AND NABAM REBIA CASE (2015)?
THE COURT SAID THAT WHEN THE GOVERNOR HAS OBJECTIVE REASONS TO BELIEVE THAT THE INCUMBENT GOVERNMENT DOES NOT COMMAND THE CONFIDENCE OF THE HOUSE, HIS CALL FOR A FLOOR TEST IN HIS DISCRETION CANNOT BE TERMED AS CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION.
WHICH EXAMS ARE PUBLIC EXAMINATIONS DEFINED IN THE PUBLIC EXAMINATIONS (PREVENTION OF UNFAIR MEANS) BILL 2024?
A PUBLIC EXAMINATION IS DEFINED AS ANY EXAMINATION AUTHORITY LISTED IN THE SCHEDULE OF THE BILL OR ANY SUCH OTHER AUTHORITY AS MAY BE NOTIFIED BY THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT.
1 UPSC- CSE, CDSE, CMSE, ESE.
2 STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION (SSC) WHICH RECRUITS FOR GROUP C(NON TECHNICAL) AND GROUP B (NON GAZETTED) JOBS IN CENTRAL GOVERNMENT.
3 RAILWAY RECRUITMENT BOARDS (RRB) WHICH RECRUITS GROUP C AND D STAFF IN INDIAN RAILWAYS.
4 INSTITUTE OF BANKING PERSONNEL SELECTION (IBPS) WHICH RECRUITS AT ALL LEVELS FOR NATIONALIZED BANKS AND REGIONAL RURAL BANKS (RRB)
5 NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY (NTA) WHICH CONDUCTS THE JEE (MAIN), NEET-UG, UGC-NET, THE COMMON UNIVERSITY ENTRANCE TEST (CUET) ETC.
APART FROM THESE ALL MINISTRIES OR DEPARTMENTS OF THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND THEIR ATTACHED OFFICES FOR RECRUITMENT OF STAFF WILL ALSO COME UNDER THE PURVIEW OF NEW LAW.
THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT CAN ADD NEW AUTHORITIES IN THE SCHEDULE THROUGH A NOTIFICATION AS AND WHEN REQUIRED.
WHAT IS A NON COMPOUNDABLE OFFENSE?
IN WHICH THE CASE CANNOT BE WITHDRAWN BY THE COMPLAINANT EVEN WHEN THE COMPLAINANT AND THE ACCUSED HAVE REACHED A COMPROMISE AND A TRIAL MUST NECESSARILY FOLLOW.
PUNISHMENT UNDER THE PUBLIC EXAMINATIONS (PREVENTION OF UNFAIR MEANS) BILL 2024?
- SECTION 9 OF THE BILL STATES THAT ALL OFFENCES SHALL BE COGNIZABLE, NON-BAILABLE, AND NON-COMPOUNDABLE WHICH MEANS THAT AN ARREST CAN BE MADE WITHOUT A WARRANT AND BAIL WILL NOT BE A MATTER OF RIGHT; RATHER, A MAGISTRATE WILL DETERMINE WHETHER THE ACCUSED IS FIT TO BE RELEASED ON BAIL.
- PUNISHMENT FOR “ANY PERSON OR PERSONS RESORTING TO UNFAIR MEANS AND OFFENCES” CAN BE THREE TO FIVE YEARS IN PRISON, AND A FINE UP TO RS 10 LAKH, IF THE CONVICT FAILS TO PAY THE FINE, “‘AN ADDITIONAL PUNISHMENT OF IMPRISONMENT SHALL BE IMPOSED, AS PER THE PROVISIONS OF THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023,”SECTION 10(1) OF THE BILL SAYS.
- UNDER SECTION 10(2), A SERVICE PROVIDER WHO IS ENGAGED TO PROVIDE “SUPPORT OF ANY KIND COMPUTER RESOURCE OR ANY MATERIAL, BY WHATEVER NAME IT MAY BE CALLED” FOR THE CONDUCT OF THE EXAMINATION CAN BE FINED UP TO RS 1 CRORE, ALONG WITH OTHER PENALTIES.
- SECTION 11(1) SAYS THE PUNISHMENT FOR ORGANIZED CRIME WILL BE “IMPRISONMENT FOR A TERM NOT LESS THAN FIVE YEARS BUT WHICH MAY EXTEND TO TEN YEARS” AND A FINE “WHICH SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN ONE CRORE RUPEES”.
WHAT IS ORGANIZED CRIME AS PER THE PUBLIC EXAMINATIONS (PREVENTION OF UNFAIR MEANS) BILL 2024?
IT IS DEFINED AS UNLAWFUL ACTIVITIES BY A GROUP OF PERSONS COLLUDING IN A CONSPIRACY TO PURSUE OR PROMOTE A SHARED INTEREST FOR WRONGFUL GAIN IN RESPECT OF A PUBLIC EXAMINATION.
WHAT IS A PROPORTIONALITY TEST?
THE TEST TO DECIDE WHETHER AN ACTION IS A REASONABLE RESTRICTION (REGARDING FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS) IS THE PROPORTIONALITY TEST.
WHAT DOES QUID PRO QUO MEAN?
A FAVOUR OR ADVANTAGE GRANTED IN RETURN FOR SOMETHING.
WHAT DOES RPA ACT, 1951 SAY REGARDING ELECTORAL BONDS?
WHAT FINANCE ACT, 2017 DID?
WHAT SC SAID?
1 SECTION 29C OF RPA 1951 REQUIRES PARTIES TO PREPARE A REPORT DETAILING THE DONATIONS RECIEVED BY THEM IN A FINANCIAL YEAR.
THEY ARE REQUIRED TO DECLARE ALL CONTRIBUTIONS HIGHER THAN RS 20,000 AND SPECIFY WHETHER THEY WERE RECIEVED FROM INDIVIDUALS OR COMPANIES.
2 FINANCE ACT 2017 AMENDED THE RP ACT. IT SAID THE REQUIREMENT TO DECLARE ALL DONATIONS IN EXCESS OF RS 20,000 WOULD NOT APPLY TO DONATIONS RECIEVED THROUGH ELECTORAL BONDS.
3 SC STRUCK DOWN THE AMENDMENT AS THE ORIGINAL REQUIREMENT TO DISCLOSE CONTRIBUTIONS OF MORE THAN RS 20,000 DID AN EFFECTIVE JOB OF BALANCING VOTERS RIGHT TO INFORMATION WITH THE RIGHT TO PRIVACY OF DONORS.