Polity- Constitution and Political system Flashcards
(753 cards)
Promulgation of Ordinance?
- Article 123 grants such powers to Prez
- An ordinance may be concerned with any subject that the Parliament has the power to legislate on and also has the same limitations as the Parliament to legislate according to the distribution of powers between the Union, State and Concurrent Lists. Thus, An ordinance can be issued only on those subjects on which the Parliament can make laws. And, An ordinance is subject to the same constitutional limitation as an act of Parliament. Hence, an ordinance cannot abridge or take away any of the fundamental rights
- There are three limitations with regard to the ordinance making power of the executive. They are:
i. The President can only promulgate an ordinance when either of the two Houses of Parliament is not in session.
ii. The President cannot promulgate an ordinance unless he is satisfied that there are circumstances that require taking ‘immediate action’.
In Cooper case, (1970), the Supreme Court held that the President’s satisfaction can be questioned in a court on the ground of malafide. This means that the decision of the President to issue an ordinance can be questioned in a court on the ground that the President has prorogued one House or both Houses of Parliament deliberately with a view to promulgate an ordinance on a controversial subject, so as to bypass the parliamentary decision and thereby circumventing the authority of the Parliament. The 38th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1975 made the President’s satisfaction final and conclusive and beyond judicial review. But, this provision was deleted by the 44th Constitutional Amendment Act of 1978. Thus, the President’s satisfaction is justiciable on the ground of malafide
iii. Ordinances must be approved by Parliament within six weeks of reassembling or they shall cease to operate. They will also cease to operate in case resolutions disapproving the ordinance are passed by both the Houses.
- President can also withdraw an ordinance at any time. However, his power of ordinance-making is not a discretionary power, and he can promulgate or withdraw an ordinance only on the advice of the council of ministers headed by the prime minister.
- An ordinance like any other legislation, can be retrospective, that is, it may come into force from a back date.
- It may modify or repeal any act of Parliament or another ordinance.
- It can alter or amend a tax law also.
- However, it cannot be issued to amend the Constitution.
- The rules of Lok Sabha require that whenever a bill seeking to replace an ordinance is introduced in the House, a statement explaining the circumstances that had necessitated immediate legislation by ordinance should be placed before the house
Repromulgation of Ordinance?
An ordinance can be re-promulgated only thrice
SC in DC Wadhwa case (1987), ruled that successive repromulgation of ordinances with the same text without any attempt to get the bills passed by the assembly would amount to violation of the Constitution and the ordinance so repromulgated is liable to be struck down
Fundamental Rights: intro/significance/purpose?
- Magna Carta of India
- uphold the equality of all individuals, the dignity of the individual, the larger public interest and unity of the nation.
- Political democracy;
- limitations on tyranny of executive and arbitrary laws of legislature
- aims to establish a ‘govt laws of men and not of men’
- named so coz guaranteed and protected by consti, fundamental law of the land ANDcoz they are most essential for all-round developmentof individuals
Features of FRs?
- some only to citizens, others to citizens, foreigners or legal persons
- NOT absolute bt qualified. Reasonable restrictions. thus, strike a balance betn rights of individual and rights of society as a whole, betn individual liberty and social control.
- Mostly against arbitrary action of state; some against states’s actions and against action of pvt individuals
- Some negative, others positive (conferring certain prvileges on persons)
- They are justiciable
- defended and guaranteed by SC
- nt sacrosanct or permanent- Consti Amend Act, basic str
- suspended during National emergency, except Art 20 and 21
- scope of ops limited by Art31A, Art 31B adn Art 31C
- Art 33- application to armed forces can be restricted or abrogated by Parliament
- Art 34- application can be restricted during martial law
- Most of them dirctly enforceable, while a few enforced by framed laws-Such a law can be made only by the Parliament and not by state
legislatures so that uniformity throughout the country is maintained
(Article 35)
Defn of state?
- Art 12
- All local authorities like improvement trusts, etc.
- All other authorities, that is, statutory or non-statutory authorities like
LIC, ONGC, SAIL, etc. - According to the Supreme Court, even a private body or an agency
working as an instrument of the State falls within the meaning of the ‘State’
under Article 12.
Art 13?
- Judicial Review
- Article 13 (2): Parliament and thestate legislatures are clearly prohibited from making laws that may take away or abridge the fundamental rights guaranteed to the citizen
- term ‘law’ includes:
- Permanent laws enacted by the Parliament or the state legislatures;
- Temporary laws like ordinances issued by the president or the state
governors; - Statutory instruments in the nature of delegated legislation (executive legislation) like order, bye-law, rule, regulation or notification; and
- Non-legislative sources of law, that is, custom or usage having the force of law.
- Further, Article 13 declares that a constitutional amendment is not a law and hence cannot be challenged; However, Keshavanand Bharati case
Article wise FRs?
- Art 14-18: right to Equality
- Art 14: equality before law and equal protection of law
- Art 15: Prohibition of Discrimination
- Art 16: Equality of opp in public employment
- Art17: abolition of untouchability
- Art 18: Abolition of titles
- Art 19: Right to freedom
- Art 20-22: Rights to liberty
- Art 20: conviction of offences
- Art 21: Protection of life and personal liberty
- Art 22: against arrest and arbitrary detention
- Art 21A: Right to elementary education
- Art 23-24: right against exploitation
- Art 23: human trafficking and forced labor
- Art 24: child labor
- Art25-28: Right to freedom of religion
- Art 25: freedom of religion
- Art 26: freedom to manage religious affairs
- Art 27: Freedom from payment of taxes for promotion of any religion
- Art 28: Freedom from attending religious instruction or worship in certain educational institutions
- Art 29-30: Cultural and Educational rights:
- Art 29: Protection of language, script and culture of minorities
- Art 30: Right of minorities to establish and administer
educational institutions
- Art 32: consti remedies-WRITs
*
FR available only to citizens and not to
foreigners?
- 15
- 16
- 19
- 29 (language, script and culture of minorities)
- 30 (minorities educational insti)
FR available to both
citizens and foreigners
(except enemy aliens)?
- Art 14
- Art 20
- Art 21
- Art 21A
- Art 22,23,24,25,26,27,28
T/F: Art 21A (right to elementary education) is extended to foreigners too.
T
Art 14?
- citizens and foreigners
- ‘person’ also includes legal persons
- State shall not deny any person ‘equality before law’ or ‘equal protection of law’.
- ‘equality before law’ vs ‘equal protection of law’
- SC:
- where equals and unequals are treated differently, Article 14 does not apply
- ‘Rule of Law’ as embodied in Article 14 is a ‘basic feature’ of the constitution
- forbids CLASS legislation bt permits reasonable classification bt classification should not be arbitrary, artificial or evasive. Rather, it should be based on an intelligible differential and substantial distinction.
- Exceptions
‘equality before law’ vs ‘equal protection of law’?
- Equality Before Law:
- british Concept
- connotes (a) the absence of any special privileges in favour of any person, (b) the equal subjection of all persons to the ordinary law of the land administered by ordinary law courts, and (c) no person (whether rich or poor, high or low, official or non-official) is above the law.
- The concept of ‘equality before law’ is an element of the concept of ‘Rule of Law’, propounded by A.V. Dicey, the British jurist. His concept has three aspects
- Absence of Arbitrary Power: no man can be punished except for a breach of law
- Equality Before Law
- Primacy of Rights of individual and that the consti is the result of those rights as defined and enforced by the courts
- Equal Protection of Law:
- American concept
- connotes: (a) the equality of treatment under equal circumstances, both in the privileges conferred and liabilities imposed by the laws, (b) the similar application of the same laws to all persons who are similarly situated, and (c) the like should be treated alike
without any discrimination - Thus, the former is a negative concept while the
latter is a positive concept.
Exceptions to rule of equality before law?
- Immunities enjoyed by President and Guv-
- not answerable to any court for the exercise and performance of the powers and duties
- No criminal proceedings shall be instituted or continued against in any court during his term
- No process for the arrest or imprisonment shall be issued from any court during his term
- No civil proceedings against him during his term of office in any court in respect of any act done by him in his personal capacity, whether before or after he entered upon his office, until the expiration of two months next after notice has been delivered to him.
- publication in a newspaper (or by radio or television) of a substantially true report of any proceedings of either House/SLs
- MP or MLA in respect of anything said or any vote given by him in the
Legislature or any committee thereof - Art 31C- laws mad by the state for DSP in clause (b) or (c) of Art 39, cannot be challenged on Art 14 grnds. SC: “where Article 31-C comes in, Article 14 goes out”
- foreign sovereigns (rulers), ambassadors and diplomats enjoy immunity from criminal and civil proceedings.
- UNO and its agencies diplomatic immunity
Art 15?
- TWO provisions:
- State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of
- religion
- race
- caste
- sex
- Place of Birth
- no citizen shall be subjected to any disability, liability, restriction or condition on grounds only of
- religion
- race
- caste
- sex
- Place of Birth
- State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only of
wrt access to shops, restaurants, hotels, public entertainment, use of wells, tanks, ghats, roads or places of public resort maintained wholly or partly by State funds or dedicated to the use of general public
- Second Provision prohibits discrimination both by the State and private individuals, while the first provision prohibits discrimination only by the State
- exceptions
Exceptions to Art 15?
- state is permitted to make any special provision for women and
children eg. free education of children - permitted to make any special provision for the advancement of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the
scheduled castes and scheduled tribes - empowered to ———–”——————- regarding their admission to educational institutions including private educational institutions, whether aided or unaided by the state, except the minority educational institutions. (93rd CAA 2005)
T/F: Reservations for backward classes are an exception to Art 15.
F
Despite the previous f/c, SC , in Jan 2022, while uphelding the 27% quota for OBCs in All India Quota seats for NEET, reiterated that reservations for backward classes were not an exception but an extension of the principle of equality under Article 15(1) of the Constitution.
- This is seen as a positive discrimination in the Indian Context.
Art 16?
- equality of opportunity for all citizens in matters of employment or appointment to any office under the State
- no discrimination for employmnt or office under the state on grounds only of
- religion
- race
- caste
- sex
- descent
- place of birth
- place of residence
- Three exceptions
Three exceptions to art 16?
-
Parliament can prescribe residence as a condition for certain employment
or appointment in a state or union territory or local authority or other
authority; currently only Telangana and andhraP - State can provide for reservation of appointments or posts in favour
of any backward class that is not adequately represented - A law can provide that the incumbent of an office related to religious or
denominational institution or a member of its governing body should
belong to the particular religion or denomination.
Art 17?
- abolishes ‘untouchability’ and forbids its practice in any form
- Untouchability (Offences) Act 1955—-> amended in 1976 as Protection of Civil rights act 1955.
- PoCR 1955 defines civil right as any right accruing to a person by reason of the abolition of untouchability by Article 17
- term ‘untouchability’ has not been defined either in the Constitution or in the Act
- Mysore HC: not its literal or grammatical sense bt the ‘ practice as it had developed historically in he country’
- It refers to the social disabilities imposed on certain classes of persons by reason of their birth in certain castes. Hence, it does not cover social boycott of a few individuals or their exclusion from religious services, etc.
- Under PoCA, A person convicted of the offence of ‘untouchability’ is disqualified for election to the Parliament or SL.
- SC: right under Article 17 is available against private individuals and it is the constitutional obligation of the State to take necessary action to ensure that this right is not violated
Art 18?
- Four Provisions:
- Titles:
- CONFERRING: Indian state cannot confer any title (except a military or academic distinction) on any body, citizen or a foreigner
- ACCEPTING frm foreign state:
- Indian citizen: cannot
- foreigner: if holding any office of profit or trust under the state, needs consent of Prez
- Present, Emoluments or Office: For both an Indian citizen or a foreigner holding any office of profit or trust under the state, needs consent of Prez.
- Titles:
- 1996: SC upheld validity of national awards-as the are not hereditary titles of nobility and do not amount to titles.
National awards instituted in? revived in?
- 1954
- discontinued in 1977; revived in 1980
Art 19?
- Freedom of speech and expression
- assemble peacefully
- form associations or unions or cooperative societies (97th CAA,2011)
- move freely
- reside and settle
- practice any profession, occupation, trade or business
- These six rights are protected against only state action and not private
individuals. - available only to the citizens and to shareholders of a company but not to foreigners or legal persons like companies or corporations
- ‘reasonable’ restrictions only on the grounds mentioned in the Article 19 itself
Art 19: freedom of speech and expression: includes?
- propagate own or others’ views
- freedom of press
- commercial ad
- against tapping of phone
- RT telecast i.e Govt has no monopoly on e-media
- against bundh called
- RT know abt govt activities
- Freedom of Silence
- against imposition of pre-censorship on a newspaper
- RT demonstrate or picket bt not RT strike
Art 19: freedom of speech and expression: reasonable restrictions?
- soverignty and integrity of India
- security of state
- friendly foreign relations
- public order
- decency or morality
- contempt of court
- defamation
- incitement to an offence