pollution Flashcards
(71 cards)
ACIDIFICATION OF FRESHWATER
rainfall
Natural pH of rainfall 5.6 -> reaction of CO2 and rainfall (carbonic acid)
- Anthropogenic acidification (burning fossil fuels, SO2, NOx, acid rain (pH <5.6 as low as 3.5 – in E. USA and C Europe)
ACIDIFICATION OF FRESHWATER
Causes of acidification:
1) Industrial atmospheric pollution (SO2, H2S) coal power stations sulphuric acid (China, US, Russia)
2) NOx from car exhausts (nitric acid w/ rainfall) (China, India, USA)
3) Land use change – afforestation – enhanced acidification processes (coniferous trees)
ACIDIFICATION OF FRESHWATER
Buffering can vary!
- Wet deposition BEDROCK (limestone high buffering, Granite low buffering)
- Dry deposition trees major interceptors compared to moorland (absorbed into vegetation)
ACIDIFICATION OF FRESHWATER
Key impacts:
- Soil buffering decreases (esp with afforestation) areas with low buffering capacity vulnerable
- Ionic changes in soil may cause Al3+ release (becomes mobile at low pH), increase conc in water, makes freshwater more oligotrophic, makes complexes with phosphate making it biologically unavailable. (AL LIABLE AT LOW PH AND TOXIC TO AQUATIC LIFE)
ACIDIFICATION OF FRESHWATER
Key impacts: e.g. river wye
- Water acidification (River Wye, Wales) – Ledger 2025.
o Exacerbated by land use, afforestation of conifers, increased deposition of gases (interception by canopy) increased acidity from litter fall, increased base cation uptake (Ca, Mg) decreases buffering, more rapid runoff to drainage ditches (reduced potential for buffering by soils)
ACIDIFICATION OF FRESHWATER
- BIODIVERSITY LOSS ACROSS AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS:
fish
pH<5 harmful to eggs, fry and adult particulary where Na and Ca low
blood high levels of Na, Ca, need to be replaced (active transport, gills)
in acid water H+ absorbed in preference, excessive loss of Na ions can cause mortality
can see decline of healthy fish stock, Arcitic Charr, Brown trout in Scottish lochs (Turnpenny, 1989)
ACIDIFICATION OF FRESHWATER
BIODIVERSITY LOSS ACROSS AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS:
o macroinvertebrates
Al3+ and H+ dominate and absorbed instead of essential nutrients (Na, K, Ca)
Gammarus (freshwater shrimp) v. sensitive, mayflies (<6.5 lose baetidae), stoneflies most tolerant (dominate pH 4-5)
* grazers acid sensitive (mayflies, snails, shrimp)
* shredders acid tolerant (stoneflies, peat waters)
ACIDIFICATION OF FRESHWATER
BIODIVERSITY LOSS ACROSS AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS:
o microbial communities
fungi – reduce nutrient processing, reducing decomposition, more leaf litter available for shredders
algae – shifts in assemblages (esp, diatoms) influences primary production and food availability to grazers
ACIDIFICATION OF FRESHWATER
recovery
legalisation reduced SO2, NOx emissions, some chemical recovery, biological recovery much slower and often incomplete
ORGANIC POLLUTION
Mechanisms of organic pollution:
SOURCE
domestic sewage, urban runoff, industrial waste, agriculture (sewage 11,00 million l per day) – WWF website 2025
ORGANIC POLLUTION
Mechanisms of Organic Pollution: oxygen depletion
due to microbial breakdown of organic matter (oxygen sag – oxygen levels decline downstream from a pollution source as decomposers metabolise waste materials, worst case scenario, anoxic)
ORGANIC POLLUTION
Mechanisms of Organic Pollution: suspended soils
reduce light penetration and smother habitats
ORGANIC POLLUTION
impact on biota: microorganisms
sewage fungus dominates, Sphaerotilus)
ORGANIC POLLUTION
impact on biota: algae
initial decline due to light reduction, recovery leads to blooms of filamentous algae (Stigeoclonium), diatoms, cyanobacteria
ORGANIC POLLUTION
impact on biota: invertebrates
tolerant species (worms, chironomids) increase, sensistive species (mayflies, Gammarus) decrease
ORGANIC POLLUTION
impact on biota: fish
mobile species may avoid pollution, and severe incidents eliminate sensitive fish like salmonids
ORGANIC POLLUTION
Biodiversity and ecosystem function:
hypothesis
1) Species are primarily redundant
- Species are at least partially substitutable
ORGANIC POLLUTION
Biodiversity and ecosystem function:
hypothesis
2) Species are primarily singular
- Implies species make unique contribution to ecosystem functioning
ORGANIC POLLUTION
Biodiversity and ecosystem function:
hypothesis
3) Species are idiosyncratic or unpredictable because their impacts are context-dependent
- Means species contributions depend on various abiotic and biotic factors
ORGANIC POLLUTION
- Diversity stability hypothesis
ecological communities will decrease in ability to recover from disturbance and productivity as no. of species decreases (Johnson 1996)
ORGANIC POLLUTION
- Redundancy hypothesis
the loss of a few rivets (species) may go unnoticed but beyond a threshold losses can dive a catastrophic collapse (Ehrlich&Ehrlich 1981)
ORGANIC POLLUTION
- Keystone species hypothesis
some species may have disproportionately large influences on processes
ORGANIC POLLUTION
Anthropogenic perturbation lead to
non-random extinctions
- Tolerances to acidification, organic pollution are species-specific and related to: body size, physiology, morphology, life history
ORGANIC POLLUTION
Jonsson 2002: stimulating species loss following perturbation:
assessing effects on process rates
- Three species witin the shredder functional feeding group have different tolerance to pollution: crustacean, caddisfly, stonefly