Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

BIOM*3210 > Post-Midterm 2 Content > Flashcards

Post-Midterm 2 Content Flashcards

1
Q

How does times of uncertainty or lack of perceived control influence belief in CTs?

A

Circulation of rumours/misinformation/falsehoods increases

Government and public health info is contradictory or unclear (inevitable)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is it easy to believe confident but unreliable claims during times of uncertainty?

A

CTs provide simple answers for unanswered Qs (tendency towards wrong answers over no answer at all)

Allows people to retain a sense of perceived control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why is it psychologically comforting for some people to believe in CTs

A

We don’t like to think that out of the blue something terrible can happen, and would sometimes rather blame highly organized, evil people than accidents`

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do CTs provide an enemy to blame?

A

Give a scapegoat for disruption to people’s lives and motivate people for collective self-defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do CTs provide a sense of being the hero

A

People believe the scapegoat is truly evil and they are “the people” against the “power bloc”

Otherwise good people can perform violent acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How and why do CTs provide a chance to be an expert

A

The holder of the CT possessed hidden, important knowledge not held by the “experts”

The less we know about something the more confident in what we believe about it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Explain the irony of people who believe in CTs

A

They are unusually fearful of being the victim of a hoax, yet CTs are hoaxes created to manipulate the public

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Personality traits associated with conspiracy belief:

  • Low agreeability
  • Narcissism
  • Machiavellianism
  • Desire for Uniqueness
  • Openness to experience
A

Distrust

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Personality traits associated with conspiracy belief:

  • Distrust
  • Narcissism
  • Machiavellianism
  • Desire for Uniqueness
  • Openness to experience
A

Low agreeability (less likely to get along with others)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Personality traits associated with conspiracy belief:

  • Distrust
  • Low agreeability
  • Machiavellianism
  • Desire for Uniqueness
  • Openness to experience
A

Narcissism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Personality traits associated with conspiracy belief:

  • Distrust
  • Low agreeability
  • Narcissism
  • Desire for Uniqueness
  • Openness to experience
A

Machiavellianism (cold and manipulative)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Personality traits associated with conspiracy belief:

  • Distrust
  • Low agreeability
  • Narcissism
  • Machiavellianism
  • Openness to experience
A

Desire for uniqueness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Personality traits associated with conspiracy belief:

  • Distrust
  • Low agreeability
  • Narcissism
  • Machiavellianism
  • ## Desire for Uniqueness
A

Openness to experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Personality traits associated with conspiracy belief (6):

A

Distrust, low agreeability, narcissism, machiavellianism, openness to experience, desire for uniqueness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The more someone believes in conspiracy theories, the less likely they are to….

A

trust scientific facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What happens when scientists try to present evidence to disprove a CT and what is one possible reason

A

It makes the false beliefs even stronger

Repeating the CT strengthens the belief (mistake familiarity with truth)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain what happens to the first to point the finger

A

They are less likely to be perceived as the source of deceit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q
  • Small group
  • Variable effectiveness (whistle blowing is common)
  • Local
  • Transient duration (leaks occur)
  • Motivated by greed/personal gain
  • Limited abilities by factors beyond control
A

Characteristics of REAL conspiracies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q
  • 100s to 1000s of people are in on it
  • Unerring
  • Global scale
  • Perpetual
  • Conspirators are inherently evil
  • Unlimited ability to maintain control
A

Characteristics of FAKE conspiracies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is an example of unwarranted credibility

A

Donald Trumps endorsement of:
- wind farms cause cancer
- he won the 2020 election
- MMR vaccine causes autism
- Obama is not an American
- global warming is a hoax

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What does belief in medical conspiracies demonstrate

A

The inherent ability to believe mere speculation with no concern for evidence

Tendency to confirm; if we can imagine a claim being true, we ignore contradictory evidence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What does belief in medical conspiracies demonstrate

A

The inherent ability to believe mere speculation with no concern for evidence

Tendency to confirm; if we can imagine a claim being true, we ignore contradictory evidence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What drug was hastily approved by the UK government as an oral treatment for COVID-19 in November 2021?

A

Molnupiravir

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What were the original Molnupiravir claims

A

Reduces risk of COVID-19 related deaths and hospitalizations by 50%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the issue with preprints

A

Not peer reviewed (not unusual during COVID)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

T/F the molnupiravir human RCT used to guide the UK decision made claims of efficacy

A

F (it looked at the viral burden in the nasopharynx and clearly stated it should not be used to guide clinical decisions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What study was the basis of the UK decision to stockpile Molnupiravir

A

MOVe OUT

An interim analysis of an unpublished, in-progress trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Was MOVe OUT done on in or out-patients (with decisions directed towards hospitalized patients)

A

Out-patients (not hospitalized)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What was the MAIN issue for the MOVe OUT trial

A

Conclusions were based on analysis of only half of the originally planned participants (interim analysis)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What is the issue with stopping a trial early based on positive results

A

High false-positive risk (effect looks much stronger than it really is)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Why did MOVe OUT stop the trial early

A

Not based on rigorous statistical testing but on rushed assessment of the data

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Is it normal for a trial to originally show a very large risk but when it is eventually published the risk is significantly lower?

A

NO (the authors that looked at the study called it unprecedented and hinted at scientific fraud)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What is the issue with Merck funding the study

A

High COI (they are the manufacturers of the drug)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Discuss the method of analysing MOVe OUT data

A

Inappropriate (using the correct test showed no effect)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

How did MOVe OUT treat lost to follow up patients

A

As deaths (inappropriate)

If data were analysed correctly, would have seen no effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Describe the PANORAMIC Molnupiravir study and its findings

A

20x the sample size of MOVe OUT
Preliminary analysis showed no effect of Molnupiravir, but that it does reduce symptom duration by 4 dats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

What other drug besides Molnupiravir was the topic of a similar scandal

A

Oseltamivir (influenza scare)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

what is another word for a difference-in-differences analysis

A

An observational study (cannot infer causation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

When is an RCT not needed? (3)

A
  • drugs that do not heal (ex. anaesthetic; fluorescein dye)
  • when effects are immediate (ex. lancing an abscess)
  • when the body is incapable (ex. insulin; thyroxine)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

What is the duration for effects to be considered immediate?

A

seconds to minutes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

What direction is random error

A

No direction (can make interventions appear more or less effective with equal frequency)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What direction is systematic error or bias

A

Unidirectional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

How can random error be minimized

A

Can’t be minimized in a single trial, but performing systematic reviews (large number of studies) evens out the random error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

How can systematic error be minimized

A

Following CONSORT (performing a well-designed trial)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

Why are many research findings not reproducible

A

Researchers exaggerate their findings

45
Q

Where is exaggeration most often encountered in research papers

A

In the abstract conclusions (58%)

46
Q

When press releases do not exaggerate…

A

A minority of news stories do

47
Q

When press releases exaggerate…

A

A large majority of news stories do

48
Q

What proportion of the time do universities exaggerate findings (in health advice, causation claims, and inferences from animals to humans)

A

1/3 of the time

49
Q

Who is responsible for exaggeration in health science news

A

the research institutions (we should be able to fix most of the problem)

50
Q

What is the purpose of CONSORT?

A

To ensure that whatever was done in the study was DESCRIBED thoroughly (whether it was done well or not)

51
Q

What is the purpose of GRADE

A

To assess the QUALITY of the science of one or more RCTs

52
Q

What is the BODY of EVIDENCE

A

The group of RCTs that meets the minimum standards to be assessed

53
Q

  • INCONSISTENCY
  • INDIRECTNESS
  • IMPRECISION
  • PUBLICATION BIAS
A

RISK of BIAS

54
Q

The GRADE process includes an examination of:
- RISK of BIAS
-
- INDIRECTNESS
- IMPRECISION
- PUBLICATION BIAS

A

INCONSISTENCY

55
Q

The GRADE process includes an examination of:
- RISK of BIAS
- INCONSISTENCY
-
- IMPRECISION
- PUBLICATION BIAS

A

INDIRECTNESS

56
Q

The GRADE process includes an examination of:
- RISK of BIAS
- INCONSISTENCY
- INDIRECTNESS
-
- PUBLICATION BIAS

A

IMPRECISION

57
Q

The GRADE process includes an examination of:
- RISK of BIAS
- INCONSISTENCY
- INDIRECTNESS
- IMPRECISION
-

A

PUBLICATION BIAS

58
Q

The GRADE process includes an examination of: (5)

A
  • risk of bias
  • inconsistency
  • indirectness
  • imprecision
  • publication bias
59
Q

The quality of the evidence can be graded as: (4)

A
  • high
  • moderate
  • low
  • very low
60
Q

What is a quality of evidence grade of HIGH

A

very confident that the true effect is similar to the estimate of the effect

61
Q

What is a quality of evidence grade of MODERATE

A

the true effect is probably similar to the estimate of the effect, but there is a chance it is different

62
Q

What is a quality of evidence grade of LOW

A

The true effect might/could be substantially different from the estimate of the effect

We don’t know the effect of the treatment

63
Q

What is a quality of evidence grade of VERY LOW

A

The true effect is probably substantially different from the estimate of the effect (probably much smaller)

There were multiple routes for entry of bias in most studies

64
Q

How does GRADE evaluate risk of bias

A

Looks at ~6 CONSORT items (randomization, allocation concealment, blinding, selective reporting, etc)

Each paper is scored for each CONSORT item as:
- low risk (+)
- unclear risk (?)
- high risk (-)

65
Q

What is inconsistency in a SR

A

Unexplained heterogeneity of results across studies

66
Q

What are signs of inconsistency

A
  • CI’s have minimal or no overlap (suggests variation is more than random chance)
  • large differences between means/point estimates
  • statistical tests of heterogeneity (I2)
67
Q

Explain I2 test

A

ranges from 0-100%
0 = very consistent (random chance)
100 = very inconsistent (complete heterogeneity)

68
Q

How does GRADE assess indirectness

A

PICO

Populations
Interventions
Controls
Outcomes

Research is conducted in the POPULATION we want to provide answers for

RCTs include the INTERVENTIONS we are interested in and compare these to the appropriate CONTROLS

OUTCOMES of interest have actually been measured and not a poor surrogate

69
Q

How is imprecision evaluated using GRADE

A
  • large CI
  • is there an OIS?
  • is there sufficient number of events?
70
Q

What is the OIS

A

Optimal information size (if you combine participants from all studies, is the number larger than the sample size needed for a single adequate study)

71
Q

How is publication bias evaluated using GRADE

A

funnel plots (want symmetry)

72
Q

What is a meta-analysis

A

Take all the data from all RCTs and assess it as if it is data from one massive trial

73
Q

What is the value of a SR

A

Its estimates of certainty (the actual grading of the evidence) because it tells you if the results are believable or not

74
Q

T/F SR will use observational studies if there are no RCTs available

A

T

75
Q

What was the conclusions of the Wakefield (1998) study

A

There was no link between the MMR vaccine and the condition described (ASD)

76
Q

Where did Wakefield make claims of the MMR-autism link
a) Study
b) Press release

A

b

77
Q

What were the COI in the Wakefield study

A
  • he received $430,000 to find a link
  • he filed a patent for a single vaccine
78
Q

What did Brian Deer find about the medical records used in the Wakefield study

A

Wakefield manipulated data on patient histories, descriptions and diagnoses to make it look like he had discovered a novel syndrome

79
Q

  • medical community cast as a villain
  • vaccine fear is resistant to evidence
  • physicians threatened with murder
  • more infections and deaths
A

fear of vaccines

80
Q

GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES of WAKEFIELD (1998):
- fear of vaccines
-
- vaccine fear is resistant to evidence
- physicians threatened with murder
- more infections and deaths

A

medical community cast as a villian

81
Q

GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES of WAKEFIELD (1998):
- fear of vaccines
- medical community cast as a villain
-
- physicians threatened with murder
- more infections and deaths

A

vaccine fear is resistant to evidence

82
Q

GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES of WAKEFIELD (1998):
- fear of vaccines
- medical community cast as a villain
- vaccine fear is resistant to evidence
-
- more infections and deaths

A

physicians threatened with murder

83
Q

GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES of WAKEFIELD (1998):
- fear of vaccines
- medical community cast as a villain
- vaccine fear is resistant to evidence
- physicians threatened with murder
-

A

more infections and deaths

84
Q

GLOBAL CONSEQUENCES of WAKEFIELD (1998): (5)

A
  • fear of vaccines
  • medical community cast as a villain
  • vaccine fear is resistant to evidence
  • physicians threatened with murder
  • more infections and deaths
85
Q

What is the issue with Medical Hypotheses

A

It welcomes “probably untrue ideas”

86
Q

What are the issues with the study about mercury-based preservatives and autism risk

A
  • the MMR vaccine never contained mercury
  • the authors of the opinion piece included a marketing consultant
  • the opinion piece was not peer-reviewed
87
Q

T/F when mercury-based preservatives were removed from vaccines in 2001 it changed the rate of autism

A

F

88
Q

What were the results of the CDC study finding no MMR-autism link?

A

Death threats by the anti-vaccine community

89
Q

What is happening with herd immunity and the vaccine controversy

A

Herd immunity is essential for children that cannot develop or hold an effective vaccine titre

Parents who refuse to vaccinate benefit from herd immunity while helping to impair and dismantle that protection

90
Q

What is the known reason for the increase in autism rates

A

Changing definitions (ex. including Aspergers may have doubled the number of children under the definition of ASD)

91
Q

What is the risk for the most serious side effect from the MMR vaccine (allergic reaction)

A

1/1,000,000

92
Q

Explain pseudoscience used in the MMR-autism debate

A
  • using papers that were withdrawn due to data manipulation
  • using reviews that purposely excluded data showing no link or included studies that actually saw no link but then claim they did have a link
  • using studies with clear COI
  • ignoring contradictory papers
93
Q

when does selection bias most often occur

A

controversial topics or when COI are present

94
Q

what is the issue with the VAERS database

A

it is an online vaccine adverse effect reporting system and should not be used to draw links of causation, yet it is used as scientific evidence against vaccines

95
Q

what is citation diversion

A

citing a paper but claiming it has a different meaning

96
Q

what is a dead end citation

A

citing a paper that does not contain comments addressing the claim you are using it to support

97
Q

what is citation transmutation

A

converting a hypothesis to fact through the act of citation alone

98
Q

what are the two inherent tendencies that drive anti-vax beliefs

A
  • tendency to accept a false answer over no answer
  • tendency to believe (emotionally charged) stories over data
99
Q

what can the medical community do to combat vaccine resistance

A
  • use stories and get them circulating online
  • develop skills to help you identify reliable medical info
  • license to practice medical science
100
Q

What is the def’n of evidence based medicine (EBM)

A
  • the integration of the best available evidence with clinical expertise and patient values in pursuit of the best possible outcomes
101
Q

what is the best research evidence

A

Clinically relevant and patient centered
- accuracy and precision of diagnostic tests
- power of prognostic markers
- efficacy and safety of therapeutic and preventative treatments

102
Q

what is clinical expertise

A

The ability to rapidly identify:
- health state/diagnosis
- benefits/risks of interventions
- personal values and expectations

103
Q

what are patient values

A

unique preferences, concerns and expectations

104
Q

  • track down the best available evidence to answer these questions
  • critically appraise the evidence for its validity and usefulness
  • implement the results into clinical practice
  • evaluate performance
A

convert information needs to answerable questions (formulate the problem)

105
Q

The essential steps in the science of EBM:
- convert information needs into answerable questions
-
- critically appraise the evidence for its validity and usefulness
- implement the results into clinical practice
- evaluate performance

A

track down the best available evidence to answer these questions

106
Q

The essential steps in the science of EBM:
- convert information needs into answerable questions
- track down the best available evidence to answer these questions
-
- implement the results into clinical practice
- evaluate performance

A

critically appraise the evidence for its validity and usefullness

107
Q

The essential steps in the science of EBM:
- convert information needs into answerable questions
- track down the best available evidence to answer these questions
- critically appraise the evidence for its validity and usefulness
-
- evaluate performance

A

implement results into clinical practice

108
Q

The essential steps in the science of EBM:
- convert information needs into answerable questions
- track down the best available evidence to answer these questions
- critically appraise the evidence for its validity and usefulness
- implement the results into clinical practice
-

A

evaluate performance

109
Q

The essential steps in the science of EBM: (5)

A
  • formulate the problem
  • track down the best available evidence
  • assess evidence for validity and usefulness
  • implement
  • evaluate

BIOM*3210 (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions