poverty reduction Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

adams et al 2004 what are the 4 main ways viewing poverty reduction and conservation

A

1) poverty and cons separate policy realms
2) poverty critical constraint conservation
4)cons not comprimise povert reduction
5)poverty reduction depends living resource conservation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

kaimouitz, skeil 2007 why conservation must include pov reduction

A

-recourses vital lives
- most outside pas
-need particportary aproach
-poor should be compensated strict protection
-only effective have trust locals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

liesher et al 2013 how does cons relying onnon timber forest products

A

-create poverty traps
-overexploitation
-unpredictable incomes
-middle men
-output biod uncertan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

liesher et al 2013 what different stratagies cons and poverty reduction

A

-non-timber forest products
-com based enterprises
-PES
-eco-toursim
-local managed marine area
-mangrove conservation
-e,ployment pa
-agroforestry
-grassland maangment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

liesher et al 2013 what main challanges integrating poverty reduction and conservation

A

-house holds high physical , social capital more likely to benefit
-elite capture
-high disparities and inequalites within communites
-lack hard evidence links poverty and biod

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

conclusion link pov and cons liesher et al 2013

A

cons unlikly meet need poor need focus suatinable socail economic dev with links to cons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

swich et la 2014 how much do we know links es and poverty allievation

A

gaps knowledge
-how change occur and how stop pov by using resouses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

brockington and wilkie 2015 what are the main contestions with PAs

A

-historical- displacement people
-conceptual - waht sort of nature do parks conserve
-political- land rights , land grapping convtion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

brockington and wilkie 2015 what are main iisues managing PA

A

-physical and economic displacement
-lack of quality data
-working out who entitled compensation- more people effected just indigenous
-governance - are protecting local or state benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

gardner et al 2013 what lessons can we learn from sucessful com cons madagasca

A

-need multiple use
-co managed local com and ngo
-legal tecnical empowment recourse users
-try reduce dependece natural resouses
-important have saftey net
-marine easier to manage more renewable resorce
where opportunity cost need compensation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

mace et al 2014 how have views nature cons changed over time

A

1)nature for itself- intact habitat no people
2) nature despite people
3) nature for people
4)people and nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

naidoo et al 2019 how much higher wealth do people have near PA

A

17%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how pas improve wellbeing naidoo et al 2019

A

1) pas increase household wealth when also tourism - money spent house hold assets
2) increase income spent food and nutrition
3) abundance animals sold income - money can be spent
4) pas improve envi and water quality = benefits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

redford et al 2008 should cons be supporting poverty

A

no only o.025% world poor in extrmely wild places cons not help much poverty but could be useful create partnerships least acessbile places

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

sanderson et al 2003 what is needed to change to make cons and povert compatible

A

-freeze agri expansion, recover degraded land , enhance land already human use
-scale down rural develomnet , enhnace low output producers
- redesin animal husbandary emphasise indignous breed, low heard density , husbandry techniques benfit poor
-sustian fisheries small scale common proterty regime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

whats world bank definition poverty

A

-less $2.15 day

17
Q

what factors make up multidimention poverty indicator

A

-health
-education
-living standarsa

18
Q

define pov reducution

A

lift people out pov

19
Q

define pov allievation

A

adress some simptoms pov

20
Q

define pov prevention

A

stop people fallingpov

21
Q

how millenum ecosystem assessment link to poverty

A

-ecs approach human wellbeing show link nature and human wellbeing

22
Q

what key finding MEA link to poverty

A

-biod rich = more es
-degradation harm poor
-hard find clear causal relationship biod and pov
-do decrease biod- decline welbeing

23
Q

2019 IPBES why biod important

A

help achieve SDGs oov, hunger and wellbing
need holisitc view cons

24
Q

what examples wording IPBES 2019 report

A

-mother earth, system life
-nature benfit people
-living harmony nature

25
how much exteme poor live rural areas castenda et al
80%
26
why do poor desproporttly depend on nature
isolated -lack infrastrucutre -markets -educatoin -opportunites
27
how are natural resouses saftey net poor
-back up option when other income fail eg seasonal gap filler lack crops
28
why biod important saftey net poor
-resourses harvested free -few technical bariier exploitation -same place many poor
29
whats the view of migrants and resorce extaction
recourse degradors -in times stress head to research rich areas and as lack barriers to entry exploit resources
30
whats jones et al 2018 view of migrants and NR
migrants not exceptional resource degradors, not more likly to degrade than locals
31
Why does NR play limited role on poverty reduction
-used employment last resort -act as poverty trap as NR not valuable enough escape poverty -fully alleviate pov must break dependence NR
32
what issues growing affluence
more envi destruction overconsume resouces
33
pullins 2013 finding impact cons and pov
-opportunity cost norn more by the poor -com around pa pooer average
34
woodhouse 2018 what tradeofs exist cons
-between soical and ecological outcomes - different soical outcomes -between different social groups
35
why cons and poverty sperate realms
-not connected -invest in pov reduction misalocate cons resourves if pov cause destruction must protected more area
36
view: why pov critical contraint on cons
-cons fail dont adress pov -focus income generating activities , alternative livlyhood, dev intevention
37
view why cons should comprimise pov reduction
-people first -cons not undermine pov reduction -achieve code conduct, impact assessment , safeguarding , participortary planning, gov, compensation
38
view why pov reduction depend on recourses cons/
-poor depend on nr -livlihood imporved through cons -achieve pa, s, resource managment , com managment , s. yield
39
How much can fisher make tsimembo-manambolomaty Gardner 2013
$1562 =750% mean income