PP TEST 1 Flashcards

(70 cards)

1
Q

what is a laypersons view of personality?

A
  • a collection of adjectives that describe a person
  • denote what is different about a person
  • consistent over time and situations
  • Traits are present/absent (have vs have not)
  • explanation for behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

how do Psychologist’ view personality?

A
  • an organized collection of adjectives that describe a person
  • relatively consistent over time and situations
  • traits are normally distributed along a continuum
  • explanation for personality
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

units of personality

A
  • not just a single behaviour
  • a set of behaviours that cohere to produce a detectable, recognizable pattern
  • traits reflect a predisposition to respond to a set of stimuli in a functionally equivalent way
    • ex: avoids eye contact when meeting new people, fidgets when in large groups, blushes & stutters when others pay him/her attention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is personality Psychology?

A

-Larsen and Buss
- “Personality is the set of psychology traits and mechanisms within the individual that are organized and relatively enduring and that influence his/her interactions with, and adaptations to, the intrapsychic, physical, and social environments” (p. 3)
- “personality is the set of psychology traits…”
-ex: introversion/extraversion
- conscientiousness
- “impression management”
- Narcissism
- ““… and mechanisms within the individual …”
- mechanisms have:
- an input or trigger (e.g., a cue, situation)
- a decision, process, etc. (e.g., an appraisal)
- an output (e.g., some response, behaviour)
e.g., ways of dealing with stress,
achievement motivation, fear of failure
-“… that are organized and relatively enduring…”
- organized: some order, coherence (not random; with a cause and consequence)
- enduring: relatively stable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Domains of Knowledge

A
No single, unifying meta-theory for personality
- Historically …
   - Psychodynamic Theories 
       (e.g., Sigmund Freud)
   - Humanistic Theories (e.g., 
          Carl Rogers)
     - Learning Theories (e.g., B. F. Skinner)
Domains of knowledge 
- Trait Perspective
- Behavioural Genetic  
 - Perspective
- Biological Perspective
- Evolutionary Perspective
- Psychodynamic Perspective
- Cognitive/Experiential 
  - Perspective
 - Narrative Perspective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

why so many perspectives?

A
  • personality draws from other areas of psychology
    (personality in the middle)
  • but focuses on individual differences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is the Goal of personality psychology?

A
  • describe and explain the person and people

Idiographic vs Nomothetic Approach (Allport, 1937)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

idiographic

A
  • every person is unique
  • idiographic: every person is unique.
  • Case study approach. e.g., What makes you tick? What are your goals, aspirations…
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

nomothetic

A
  • general laws that apply to most, if not all, people.
  • e.g., What are basic dimensions of personality?
  • How do Introverts differ from Extraverts?
  • How do attachments in infancy influence relationships in adulthood?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

McAdams 3 levels of personality

A
  • How do we make sense of people
    1) Traits - (introverted, dominant, shy)
    2) Personal Concerns (goals, motives, coping styles)
    3) Identity (life story; meaning & purpose in one’s life)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Personality as a system

A
  • personality is a system within a system

- a system is a set of interrelated parts (ex- the solar system, a university)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Personality as a set of interrelated parts

Personality as a system

A
  • McAdams’s levels, Larsen et al.’s domains …

- Each part links to some other subdiscipline of Psych

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

As a subdiscipline within Psychology

Personality as a system

A
  • Personality psychologists use methods & approaches shared by other psychologists
    • Focus on behaviour (including thoughts, feelings…)
    • Scientific method
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Assumptions of personality psychology

A

“Determinism”
- Behaviour has reasons, we may not know them
Verifiable and replicable
- Method saying what was done so that experience can be repeated
“Value free”
- Designing questions in a way that’s falsifiable
Empirical
- Based on observations and data
Systematic (ex- controlled conditions, manipulate one thing and hold everything constant)
- Manipulate one thing, everything else is held constant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Science and Truth…

A
  • Science has nothing to do with truth!!
  • Scientists never “prove anything”
  • Instead, science is a way of arriving at “consensus”
    • Popper: “truth can’t be empirically demonstrated”
    • Einstein: “1000 observations cant prove me right, but 1
      observation can prove me wrong”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Theory …

A

“A set of propositions or hypotheses that purport to explain a phenomenon”
- Why is it that this happens?
General statements that explain relations among phenomena, observations, etc.
- Usual about connects or relations between things
Falsifiable, but not necessarily directly testable (because it is too general)
ex - Evolution by Natural Selection
distinctive features of human nature (physical and psychological) have developed by small increments over many generations because of the “selective advantage” they gave our ancestors.
Selective advantage in terms of reproductive success & survival
Drivers of evolution is reproduction and survival

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

A Subtheory

A

Parental Investment Theory
The sex that invests more in offspring should be more choosy about potential mates than the sex investing less in offspring.
Applies to all sexual creatures not just humans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Predictions (Hypotheses)

A

Testable
Derived from the theory
Conditional statements (if…then….)
Variables operationalized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

An Empirical Test

A

Empirical evidence is the information received by means of the senses, particularly by observation and documentation of patterns and behavior through experimentation.
ex:
- Attractive male/female confederate approaches members of opposite sex on campus
Confederate: “Hi, I’ve been noticing you around campus lately, and I find you very attractive.”
Then Confederate asks either:
“would you go out on a date with me tonight?”
“would you go back to my apartment with me tonight?”
“would you have sex with me tonight?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Neuroticism

A

Feeling like they are being persecuted, thinkinking they will die from sickness, anxious, depressed, worrier, moody, easily provoked - emotionally all over the place
Range going from emotional stability to neuroticism - most people in the middle of the two, very few people at the extremes
How do you measure where people are on the scale?
Can only see behaviours
Once multiple go together can call it a personality trait

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

what are the four types of data gathering methods

A
  • observer data
  • test data
  • life outcomes data
  • self report
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

self report

A

Ex - questionnaire, interview

Ask them - person reporting on themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Observer data

A

Ex - ask experts or those who know the target person
Parents, siblings, husband
- Advantages?
- More accurate, not subjective to social desirability bias
Can see things that you may not even notice in yourself
- Disadvantages?
- Multiple people may see you differently - lacking reliability
- Often do not show the same things about yourself to all people
- Some parts of you that they don’t have access to
- Some people project outward a different feeling than what’s on the inside (act)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Test Data

A

Ex - observing behaviour, recording blood pressure
Getting your actual response to something, how you behave in a particular situation - how fast is heart rate in certain situation
- Advantages?
- Can not really have a lot of bias
- Ability to observe behaviour
- Disadvantages?
- Have to establish that this test has validity
- Time consuming and expensive - a lot have to be done one participant at a time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Life outcome data
Ex - marriage, divorce, GPA, longevity, criminal record May be publicly available - Advantages? - accurate due to them being official records - Have real life consequences - Disadvantages - May not apply to the whole population - Could take a while - some associated with death - Things could have multiple causes - having multiple partners might not mean that you're a bad partner
26
How do we assess personality?
Self-Report: e.g., a questionnaire - generate a bunch of questions and asked to rate yourself items should cover range of the concept - worry - irritability - coolness under fire - resilience - Moodiness * items should differentiate highs from lows - determined by how you respond to these questions * avoid potential biases (e.g., social desirability, yea-saying or acquiescence) Asking question that everyone or no one should agree with Reverse scoring Advantages? - “The go to method” - because it's easy and inexpensive Disadvantages? - Risk of biases - Some people do not know how they would respond in certain situations if they haven't actually been in it
27
Alternate Uses test
What else can paper clips be used for ? Test of creativity Fluency: - how many different uses can you come up with Originality: - How many other people come up with the same answers Flexibility: - Range in things - all interrelated in same categories vs a large range Elaboration: - How complicated is the alternate use
28
Remote Associates Test
What 4th word goes with.... manners , round, tennis? - table Ache, hunter, cabbage? - head
29
Validity
the extent to which test/indicator measures what is supposed to measure
30
Reliability
Degree to which test/indicator represents “true” level of trait being measured -Refers to “repeatability”, consistency, or precision of scores - As a measure of personality, expect consistency If low reliability, either: - Not a personal construct (too variable) or - Too much error of measurement (random error)
31
Face validity
If i read that item or look at that test, does it look like its measuring that construct
32
Predictive or criterion validity
The extent to which the test or measure related to some other factor outside the test that it's supposed to relate to - Does it correlate with exterior factor
33
Convergent validity
Are they all pointing in the same direction (multiple tests all prove the same thing)
34
Construct validity
Have we measured this construct well, does it have all other components of validity - must have all the other elements of validity to have construct validity
35
Generalizability
To what extent does our test/indicator remain valid in new contexts, different populations? - Does the test apply outside the lab - can we apply it to a totally different group of people and still get similar results
36
Self - monitoring of expressive behaviour
Self-Monitoring (Snyder, 1974) - debating going on in personality psychology at the time - Some people consistent, some highly variable in trait expression - For some people, we can quickly infer their traits; others are more chameleon-like. - Some people are better able at reading and adapting their behaviour to the situation than are others - High self-monitor is someone who is - Good at reading social cues and adapting behavior to fit the situation - Can play different roles according to the situation - Low self-monitor is someone for whom - W Y S I W Y G (what you see is what you get)
37
What is a trait?
Trait” - Means a stroke, line ( in drawing) - A “sketch” of a person contains many lines and strokes - When we describe a person in terms of traits, we are - giving a “sketch” - A “sketch” does not capture everything, but it covers essentials
38
Traits are…
Like other aspects of personality, - Internal, not observable - Relatively stable, enduring features - Patterned Reflect a predisposition to respond to a set of stimuli in a functionally equivalent way - Quantifiable : can measure them using numbers Unipolar or bipolar - Do the opposite end of that distribution have unique names (different names at each end) Vs. “types - Divides people into this or that (ex-thinking or feeling) - Problem - people who are around the middle could shift and get a different title of what they are
39
Assumptions about Traits
Different people respond in a qualitatively different way to the same stimulus - Behaviour is not entirely determined by situation or environment Ex - some get anxious in social situations, other do not - What is it about you that causes you to act in certain ways in differing situations
40
Three approaches to identify the most important traits
- Theoretical approach - Statistical approach - Lexical approach
41
Theoretical Approach
A theoretical approach attempts to understand the root causes of something, and construct a predictive model that explicitly says when the event will happen again - Trait to be developed / assessed is suggested by theory Ex - “abnormality is continuous with normality” Narcissism, psychopathy are traits with implications for behaviour in normal populations
42
Statistical approach
Start with large pool of trait descriptors, and then group them by meaning (semantics), gradually eliminating redundant/similar terms - then let data tell how they are supposed to go together - no theory to guide selection of traits, or how they are organized; traits are descriptive
43
2 types of Narcissism
Grandiose vs. Vulnerable Narcissism - Grandiose: high self-esteem, overestimate one’s abilities, dominant, exploitative, exhibitionism - Vulnerable: defensive, insecure, sensitive to criticism, fake high self-esteem Aspects common to both: self-centered, disagreeable, antagonistic, exaggerated sense of self-importance
44
Machiavellianism
Based on writings of Niccolo Machiavelli, 16th century italian politician - The prince: advice on how to be a successful politician Manipulative use of flattery & deceit, cunning, pragmatic, opportunistic View of others as weak, self-serving and untrustworthy Disregard for conventional morality A personality trait? Christie & Geis (1970): MACH-IV - wrote book
45
Machiavellianism
Based on writings of Niccolo Machiavelli, 16th century italian politician - The prince: advice on how to be a successful politician Manipulative use of flattery & deceit, cunning, pragmatic, opportunistic View of others as weak, self-serving and untrustworthy Disregard for conventional morality A personality trait? Christie & Geis (1970): MACH-IV - wrote book
46
Psychopathy
Highly impulsive, thrill-seeking, low empathy, guiltlessness & fearlessness (callousness), superficial charm, antisocial behaviour Common in prison populations A psychiatric disorder, but also subclinical trait?
47
The “Dark Triad”
Narcissism, Machiavellianism, & Trait Psychopathy have much in common low empathy/callous, unemotional manipulative, exploitive each related to Extraversion, (low) Agreeableness … but also distinctions: Impulsivity, aggression, sex distinguishes Machs & hi trait Psychopathy Narcissists seek ego-boost, hi trait Psychopathy and Machs seek instrumental gain
48
How many trait dimensions?
When trait terms are factor analyzed so that each factor is uncorrelated with other factors, five factors emerge Regardless of - Age of S’s (adolescents to very olds) - Gender - S’s rating self, partner, friend, stranger
49
The Five Factor Model (CALLED THE BIG 5)
Five trait factors are: - Neuroticism vs. Emotional Stability - Extraversion vs. Introversion - Openness to Experience vs. Conventional - A.k.a “culture,” “intellect” - Agreeable vs. Disagreeable - Conscientiousness vs. Carelessness
50
Importance of the big 5
Serves an organizing function: - Every trait descriptor has something in common with one of these five latent traits - Every new trait concept that comes along should have something in common with one or more 5 factors - Ex - self-monitoring loads on E & O - Narcissism loads on E & A - People seem to understand self & others (in terms of traits) along 5 dimensions
51
Implications of a Circumplex
- No beginning & no end - Traits close together are similar - Diagonal traits are opposites - Further from origin = stronger, more intense
52
MMPI
Has been one of the most widely used assessment tools for psychiatric disorders… - Measure of social desirability, anxiety, ego resilience Potential Problems: - Needs to be updated and retested every decade or so - May not be applicable across cultures
53
Trait Stability Over Time
1) Rank Order | 2) Mean level
54
Mean level (stability)
- You can go up or down but you maintain overtime - Do not change a lot over an extended period of time in regards to the 5 traits - Correlation T1 - T2
55
Rank Order
- You can go up or down but you maintain overtime - Do not change a lot over an extended period of time in regards to the 5 traits - Correlation T1 - T2
56
What is Standard Deviation
the standard deviation is a measure of the amount of variation or dispersion of a set of values. A low standard deviation indicates that the values tend to be close to the mean of the set, while a high standard deviation indicates that the values are spread out over a wider range
57
Do people Change?
Summary: - Some change from teens to 20s, the pretty stable from age 30 onwards - Trends indicate improvements (more C, A less N) Do people change? How? - Major life events - Break up, losing a loved one to death
58
Posttraumatic Growth
Almost all of us will experience a trauma or majority adversity in our lifetime… Most people say that major life events caused lots of good things “Changed my priorities and values” “I have become more self confidence because I never know that i would be able to handle something like that” After trauma / adversity, most people report positive changes - Changes priorities / values - Increased self-confidence - New identity / purpose Is this personality change? Traits aren't everything
59
Life satisfaction after Adversity
Long term changes in life satisfaction after major events - Study done in germany - surveys of thousands of people every year, ask you questions about life satisfaction and what's happened in your life the past year - Have been following people for several years(15) can see how life changes impact them - Point is that most events that we view as major life changing events we tend to bounce back within a couple years (other than disability)
60
Life Events and Trait Change
Looked at the effect of marriage on extraversion - From pre to marriage extraversion goes down, not a lot All these effects seem to be random, not really predictable and are really small - they are statistically significant because they are large sample size - Personality is remarkably stable
61
Change or Continuity in Adulthood?
Dispositional (trait) changes - Not seeing a lot of trait change - in terms of 5 values Changes in values, beliefs, world views - Based off self report surveys - after big event has happened, asking people whats changes Changes in Goals, meaning & purpose in life - Aspects of personality but not traits Changes in identity and life narrative - Part of personality is how we tell our life story, trama will change how you tell that story
62
Personality Stability in Childhood
Personality vs. Temperament Temperament: precursor of personality seen in infants - Emotional reactivity - Activity level - How much energy - Sociability - How well do they get along with other people (strangers) - Observable in infants, relatively stable / enduring - Assumed to have biological bases - See it almost from day one - How do you measure? - have to rely on parents, get bias
63
How Measure Temperament?
- Parental report - Bias because parents don’t see their child as bad or falud - Behavioural observation - Problem: - Need to show that temperament is relatively stable, yet repertoire of behaviours changes wkly
64
Inhibited vs, Disinhibited
- Kagan (1989) proposed that infants differ on tendency to be inhibited / disinhibited - biologically-based , yet somewhat malleable - Something that you are born with but it also can change - Moderately stable from infancy to 7 years - Inhibited children are shy, fearful, emotionally reactive - Disinhibited children are spontaneous, outgoing, sociable very social
65
Source of inhibited Temperament
Diathesis stress model - 2 sources of information that come together - biological & environmental Biological determinants - The way your brain responds to perceived threats amygdala , hypothalamus -> sympathetic nervous system Inhibited children have lower threshold for activation Environmental determinants - Family environments - Marital quarrels - Dominating older sibling
66
Criticism of Marshmallow Studies
Mischel’s studies done with preschoolers at Stanford U (high SES sample) Is delay of Grat an acquired skill due to an inherited individual difference (ex- temperament, intelligence) He saw it as something that was malleable - would give the kids stegies “Think of this as a picture, rather than food” Watts, Duncan & Quan (2018) replication: Large sample of 4 year old from 10 sites in USA Kids of college-educated moms vs. no college edu. 7 min delay (instead of 15) Follow up at grade 1 & age 15 (achieve, behav. probs)
67
Is the Child Father of the man?
Almost every child that was born in 1972 in town was recruited into study, stayed in touch with kids even if they moved to different parts of the county - kids tested every couple years- unique opportunity to see how stable personality is Do temperaments predict adult personality? Is how you are as a child predict how you will be as an adult One unusual study: 1000+ children born in Dunedin, NZ in 1972-73 Tested at ages 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 18, 21 & 26 Retention rate of 96% - only 4% have dropped out of study over the years
68
Temperament Clusters
- Under-controlled - irritability, distractibility, trouble sitting still, emotional lability - inhibited - sluggish, shy, fearful, upset by strangers, not impulsive - Confident - eager on tasks, responsive to examiner, adapt quickly - Reserved- uncomfortable, self-critical, able to focus on tasks - Well-adjusted- some initial caution, but warmed up to examiner, self-confident, persevered on challenging tasks - Wanted to know how this predicted things going forward
69
Do Temperaments Predict Adult Personality?
At age 26, self-report and friend / spouse report traits - Self-report: - Negative emotionality (~Neuroticism) - Constraint vs. Disinhibition (~Conscientiousness) - Positive Emotionality ( ~Extraversion) Friend / spouse report: Big Five Traits (N, E, A, C, O)
70
Pathways from Temperament to Trait | 5 ways
1- Learning processes: temperament diffs might influence what & how children learn (e.g., inattentive) 2 - Environmental elicitation: temperament diffs elicit different reactions from the environment Siblings, parents, teachers - shape how you grow up 3- Environmental construal: temperament diffs may influence how children understand and process info about their environments (e.g., threatening, hostile) Some kids see things in the environment as much more threatening as other kids would see it as 4- Social Comparisons: comparisons with others may affect self-concept Comparison to peers 5 - Environmental Selection: Children may choose environments consistent with their temperament Can't sit still - chose to be in areas of high stimulation `Argue that its nature with nurture - both work together