prejudice theories Flashcards
(30 cards)
who made the social identity theory
Tajfel
what are the stages of social identity
- social categorisation
- social identification
- social comparison
social categorisation
we categorise ourselves and others as members of social groups, the in-group and out-group
social identification
we adopt the identity of our in-group then behave accordingly
we conform to the social norms of the group and our self-esteem becomes linked to the group
social comparison
to maintain group and self esteem, we compare the in-group with out-groups
we show in-group favouritism and out-group negative bias
Tajfel’s minimal group studies
his lab experiments found that when boys were placed in arbitrary groups and asked to allocate point to other boys they consistently awarded more points to boys on their team
- high level of empirical support for theory
Jane Elliot
Blue Eyes/Brown Eyes field experiment
when children placed into groups based on eye colour they quickly developed prejudice and discriminatory behaviours not observed when all seen as one group
applications of social identity theory
explains how racism is a taught behaviour
Wetherall
in minimal group studies Polynesian children more generous to out-group than white children in New Zealand so some cultural norms emphasise cooperation
opposed social identity
limitations of social identity theory
- reductionist, only explains group behaviour not individual differences, authoritarian personality better as it is specific to where one person is on the F-scale
- reduces cause of prejudice down to one factor (categorisation) so too simple
- theories grounded on studies may be limited if they lack gen/validity
- opposed by realist conflict theory
who made realistic conflict theory
Sherif
what is the basis of realistic conflict theory
intergroup hostility can arise due to competition over perceived valuable, scarce resources (situational factors) leading to prejudice against the out-group
when resources are abundant the groups cooperate in harmony
negative interdependence
individuals can only achieve their goal via failure of competitor
zero sums fate
if one side gains the other loses
super-ordinate goals
goals that require cooperation of different social groups
increase exposure and reduce hostility
Sherif’s Robbers Cave study
supports RCT
- found boys who were strangers at a summer camp quickly developed prejudice against other groups when competition was introduced, but superordinate goals lead to more out-group friendships
- however groups hostile even before competition so creation of groups alone can cause prejudice, social identity better e.g. in-group fav
application of realistic conflict theory
- ability to predict prejudice in real life e.g. in Rwanda Hutus killed 800,000 Tutsis over 3 months after economic downturn and competition for political power
Dollard
supports RCT
- prejudice against German immigrants increased in USA as jobs grew scarce
weaknesses of realistic conflict theory
- cannot measure exact cause of prejudice, we don’t know if scarce resources are a cause or consequence
- no guarantee that superordinate goals work in long term, prejudice may only reduce in the people working together not their whole groups
- failure to achieve can worsen prejudice
Aronson et al
‘jigsaw technique’
- reduction in racial tension when each child in a mixed race classroom had to complete part of a whole assignment and was dependent on other children to also perform well
so superordinate goals reduce tension when implemented consistently
Deutsch + Collins
increased social contact with out-groups reduces effects of stereotypes e.g. integrated housing projects had lower prejudice than segregated housing projects
why does an authoritarian personality increase prejudice
- more likely to socially categorise into strict in-groups and out-groups
- strict upbringing means they can’t express hostility correctly and displace it onto minorities
strengths of authoritarian personality for prejudice
- considers dispositional factors and individual differences
- F-scale valid due to objective and scientific uses as a tool to measure personality
limitations of authoritarian personality for prejudice
- doesn’t explain how whole social groups can be prejudiced as not everyone has an authoritarian personality
- F-scale flawed due to acquiescence bias as all questions worded in same direction, may just measure tendency to agree with everything