Prep 02 Flashcards
(250 cards)
Describe your approach to mentoring a junior engineer to ensure they are set up for success.
My approach to mentoring a junior engineer focuses on structured growth and empowerment.
Initial Onboarding and Skill Assessment
I start by understanding their current skill set and learning style. We’ll collaboratively define initial goals, focusing on foundational cloud concepts and our team’s specific technologies.
Hands-on Learning with Support
I provide well-defined, manageable tasks that incrementally increase in complexity. I encourage them to attempt solutions independently, but ensure I’m readily available for questions and guidance. We’ll pair program frequently in the beginning, gradually reducing the frequency as they gain confidence.
Regular Feedback and Code Reviews
Consistent, constructive feedback is crucial. This includes regular one-on-one check-ins to discuss progress, challenges, and career aspirations. Detailed code reviews are a primary learning tool, focusing not just on bugs, but on best practices, scalability, and security within our cloud environment. I emphasize the “why” behind suggestions.
Encouraging Ownership and Exploration
As they progress, I push for greater ownership of features and projects. I encourage independent research and exploration of new cloud services or solutions, fostering a mindset of continuous learning. I’ll also help them identify internal and external resources for professional development.
Celebrating Success and Learning from Failures
Finally, I ensure we celebrate successes, no matter how small, to build confidence. Equally important, I frame failures as learning opportunities, emphasizing post-mortems as a chance to grow rather than assign blame.
When answering about mentoring, what should I state as my primary goal?
The goal is not just task completion, but fostering the junior engineer’s long-term confidence and self-sufficiency.
What 3-step mentoring process can I describe in my answer?
Describe a process of: 1) Assigning a well-defined initial task, 2) Providing support through pairing and guidance, and 3) Conducting a constructive code review focused on learning.
In my answer about mentoring, what key action should I emphasize?
Emphasize asking guiding questions rather than giving the solution directly; this teaches them how to solve problems.
How can I describe a successful mentoring outcome?
The engineer not only finished their task but later applied the same concepts independently to a new, different problem.
How would you effectively onboard a new team member to get them productive quickly?
To effectively onboard a new team member for quick productivity in a cloud environment, I’d implement a structured, phased approach:
- Pre-Boarding & Setup (Before Day 1):
- Provision Accounts: Ensure all necessary cloud platform (AWS/Azure/GCP) accounts, IAM roles, SaaS tool access (Jira, Slack, Confluence, Git), and development environment access are set up and tested.
- Hardware Ready: Laptop/peripherals configured and shipped (if remote).
- Welcome Pack: Share a “welcome” email with first-day logistics, team contacts, and a high-level overview of their first week.
- Day 1 - Immersion & Introductions:
- Personal Welcome: A warm welcome from the manager and key team members.
- Team & Project Overview: High-level introduction to the team’s mission, current projects, and how their role contributes.
- Initial Setup Assistance: Dedicated time (and a buddy) to ensure all local development environments, cloud CLIs, and necessary tools are installed and working. First successful “Hello World” or equivalent simple task.
- HR & Admin: Ensure all essential HR/IT paperwork is clear and completed.
- Week 1 - Foundations & First Contributions:
- Buddy System: Assign an experienced team member as a primary point of contact for daily questions and informal guidance.
- Documentation Deep Dive: Point them to key internal documentation: team wikis, architecture diagrams, coding standards, CI/CD pipelines, and cloud resource definitions (IaC).
- Codebase Tour: A guided tour of the core codebase, key services, and deployment processes.
- First Small Task: Assign a very small, isolated task (e.g., a documentation update, a minor bug fix, or adding a simple logging statement) that can be completed, reviewed, and deployed within the week. This builds confidence and familiarises them with the entire development lifecycle.
- Regular Check-ins: Daily informal check-ins with their manager and buddy.
- Month 1 - Integration & Deeper Understanding:
- Project Context: Deeper dives into current project goals, key stakeholders, and upcoming features.
- System Architecture Review: Explain the broader cloud architecture, common patterns, security considerations, and monitoring tools.
- Knowledge Transfer: Gradual handover of domain-specific knowledge from team members.
- Code Review Participation: Encourage active participation in code reviews, both receiving feedback on their contributions and providing feedback on others’ (under guidance).
- Independent Tasks: Gradually assign more complex, yet still well-defined, tasks, increasing their autonomy.
- One-on-One: Bi-weekly formal 1:1 with manager to discuss progress, challenges, and career aspirations.
Throughout the process, emphasize an open-door policy for questions, provide constructive and timely feedback, and celebrate small successes to build confidence and momentum. The goal is to get them contributing meaningfully within days, and independently within weeks.
For onboarding, what is the main goal I should communicate?
The goal is to make the new member feel welcome, connected, and able to make their first meaningful contribution quickly.
What preparation steps can I mention to show I am proactive about onboarding?
Mention preparing their accounts, hardware, and access before day one, along with a small, well-documented starter project.
What is a key action for a new hire’s first week?
Assign them an ‘onboarding buddy’ and schedule introductory 1-on-1s with yourself and key team members.
What is a good, concrete goal for a new team member’s first sprint?
The goal should be for them to successfully merge their first small piece of code or documentation into production.
As a Tech Lead, how would you foster a positive and inclusive team culture?
As a Tech Lead, fostering a positive and inclusive team culture is paramount. Here’s my approach:
* Lead by Example:
* Transparency: Be open about decisions, challenges, and successes (where appropriate).
* Respect & Empathy: Treat every team member with respect, actively listen to their perspectives, and acknowledge their feelings.
* Humility: Admit mistakes and be open to feedback from anyone on the team.
* Cultivate Psychological Safety:
* Blameless Post-Mortems: Focus on process and system improvements after issues, not individual blame.
* Encourage Questions & Ideas: Create an environment where asking “dumb questions” or proposing unconventional ideas is encouraged, not ridiculed.
* Safe Space for Disagreement: Promote healthy debate and constructive conflict, ensuring everyone feels heard and valued, even when opinions differ.
* Promote Inclusive Communication:
* Active Listening: Genuinely listen to understand, rather than just to respond.
* Diverse Voices: Actively solicit input from all team members, especially quieter ones, in meetings and discussions.
* Clear & Concise: Ensure communications are clear, avoiding jargon where possible, and accessible to everyone.
* Recognize Contributions: Publicly and privately acknowledge individual and team efforts.
* Champion Growth & Development:
* Mentorship & Coaching: Actively mentor junior engineers and encourage peer-to-peer learning.
* Learning Opportunities: Support access to training, conferences, and new technologies.
* Stretch Assignments: Provide opportunities for team members to step outside their comfort zone and grow.
* Value Diversity & Individuality:
* Recognize Unique Strengths: Understand and leverage each team member’s unique skills, experiences, and perspectives.
* Cultural Sensitivity: Be mindful and respectful of different cultural backgrounds, holidays, and working styles.
* Work-Life Balance: Encourage healthy boundaries and flexibility to support personal well-being.
By consistently applying these principles, the goal is to build a high-performing team where everyone feels safe, respected, valued, and empowered to contribute their best work.
What is the foundation of a great team culture that I should mention?
Psychological safety, where team members feel safe to ask questions, make mistakes, and challenge ideas respectfully.
How can I show that I model the right behaviour for a good culture?
By explaining that you lead by example: admitting your own mistakes, listening actively, and never blaming individuals for failures.
What is a practical process that supports a positive culture?
Running regular, blameless post-mortems for failures and constructive, action-oriented retrospectives for sprints.
How do you handle disagreements in a way that supports the culture?
By framing them as ‘team vs. problem,’ not ‘person vs. person,’ and using structured frameworks for decision-making.
Imagine you disagree with a technical decision made by your manager or a senior architect. How would you handle that situation professionally?
When disagreeing with a senior, what should my first step be?
First, listen carefully to fully understand their perspective, their goals, and the constraints they are working with.
When disagreeing with a decision, how should I present my counter-argument?
With data and logic, not just opinion. Prepare a concise case with pros/cons, cost analysis, or Proof-of-Concept results.
What principle must I ultimately follow in a disagreement?
The ‘disagree and commit’ principle. It’s vital to debate respectfully, but you must fully support the final decision once it’s made.
What is the wrong way to handle a disagreement with a senior?
Arguing in a public forum, being purely emotional, or going around them to undermine their decision.
A Product Manager wants a feature you know will create significant technical debt. How would you manage this conversation?
Start by acknowledging the product manager’s goals to foster a collaborative spirit. Frame the technical debt as a direct business risk, explaining its “interest” will slow future development and increase bugs. Propose a compromise, such as a simpler initial version or dedicating a future sprint to refactoring. Clearly articulate the long-term impact on team velocity, product quality, and developer morale. Document the final decision and the agreed-upon plan to manage the debt transparently.
In a technical debt discussion, what is my primary role?
To be the advocate for the system’s long-term health by clearly and calmly explaining the consequences of the decision.
In a disagreement, explain why saying no, is good or bad and explain your selection.
Simply saying ‘no’ or ‘that’s bad practice.’ You must explain the ‘why’ and the future impact.
What is a constructive way to explain technical debt?
Quantify the debt with an analogy: ‘This shortcut will save us 2 days now, but will likely cost us 3 weeks of refactoring work next quarter.’