Private M&A Flashcards

Readings (16 cards)

1
Q

Klausner & Subramanian – The Economic Structure of Business Transactions Chapter II

A

Contracts in M&A allocate risk under uncertainty and information gaps using tools like MAC clauses, warranties, and strategic design—not to eliminate risk, but to manage it efficiently.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Dierickx & Koza – Information Asymmetries: How Not to Buy a Lemon

A

Information asymmetry in M&A leads to adverse selection and distrust, which parties mitigate through tools like warranties, earnouts, and relational trust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Claire Hill – Why Contracts Are Written in Legalese

A

Contracts stay complex and archaic not for clarity but due to lawyer habits, risk-aversion, and a system that rewards precedent over simplification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Choi & Triantis – Strategic Vagueness in Contract Design

A

Vagueness in contracts—especially MAC clauses—is a deliberate strategy to reduce costs, preserve flexibility, and enable renegotiation under uncertainty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Cathy Hwang – Deal Momentum

A

Non-binding agreements function as soft commitments that build deal momentum through reputational and organizational signaling, not enforceability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Practical Law – Warranties and Indemnities

A

Warranties offer broad risk allocation and disclosure incentives, while indemnities target specific risks with easier recovery—both central to M&A risk management.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Rafal Zakrzewski – Representations and Warranties Distinguished

A

Warranties and representations have different remedies; only representations allow misrepresentation claims—precise drafting is crucial to limit or expand liability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Klausner & Subramanian – Deals: The Economic Structure of Business Transactions Chapter III

A

Earnouts and CVRs bridge valuation gaps in M&A by aligning incentives, but are risky and complex to implement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Brian Quinn – The Performance of Earnouts in Corporate Acquisitions

A

Earnouts are better seen as tools for managing shared uncertainty—not as signals of seller confidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gilson & Schwartz – Understanding MACs: Moral Hazard in Acquisitions

A

MAC clauses promote seller investment by protecting against buyer walkaways for market-wide events, not just value drops.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Eric Talley – On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Contractual Conditions

A

MACs mainly allocate uncertainty, with clauses adapting to ambiguity by excluding systemic risks and focusing on firm-specific harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Subramanian & Petrucci – Deals in the Time of Pandemic

A

COVID-19 shifted focus from MACs to ordinary course covenants as the key termination tool in M&A, prompting major drafting changes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Bobby Reddy – Locked Box vs PPA in UK/US PE

A

UK PE prefers locked box pricing for certainty and clean exits; US favors post-closing adjustments for buyer protection, though locked box is gaining US interest.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Sean Griffith – Representation and Warranty Insurance (RWI)

A

RWI shifts post-closing liability from sellers to insurers, enabling clean exits and faster deals, but raises concerns about moral hazard and adverse selection.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Stephen Bainbridge – LVMH/Tiffany MAC Dispute

A

The LVMH–Tiffany case shows MAC clauses are hard to invoke legally but useful as renegotiation tools; post-COVID, MAC clauses now more often include explicit pandemic carveouts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

BM Brazil v Sibanye (2024 EWHC 2566)

A

The court held no valid MAE occurred; Sibanye’s attempt to terminate the deal failed, affirming the high legal bar for invoking MAE clauses under English law.