Private Nuisance and Rylands v Fletcher Flashcards

(32 cards)

1
Q

What was the main issue in Hunter v Canary Wharf [1997]?

A

High rise buildings prevented TV signal to flat

C must have a legal interest in the affected land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In Tetley v Chitty [1986], what must the defendant do to be liable for nuisance?

A

D must create the nuisance or allow it to continue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What caused the nuisance in Cocking v Eacott [2016]?

A

Daughter’s barking dog caused a nuisance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What factor do courts consider regarding location in Barr v Biffa [2012]?

A

The courts will take into account the character of a location.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was significant about the timing of Coventry v Lawrence [2014] SC?

A

Racetrack existed before the residents’ homes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

In St Helen’s Smelting v Tipping [1865] HL, what does location become irrelevant to?

A

Location is irrelevant when physical damage is caused.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What type of event can amount to a nuisance according to Crown River Cruises v Kimbolton [1996]?

A

Even a one-off event can amount to a nuisance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the ruling regarding low-level noise in Murdoch v Glacier Metal [1998]?

A

Low level noise is unlikely to be unlawful.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the issue in Bridlington Relay v Yorks Electricity [1965]?

A

Overhead power cables interfered with TV signal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does extra sensitive use imply in the context of nuisance?

A

Extra sensitive use can be claimed if ordinary use would also cause damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the impact of the test for sensitivity in Network Rail v Morris [2004]?

A

The test for sensitivity is now one of reasonable foreseeability.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was significant about the case Fearn v Tate Gallery [2023] SC?

A

Important case on various elements of unlawfulness (LDDSRM).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does social utility mean in the context of damages in Dennis v Ministry of Defence [2003]?

A

Social utility means that damages might be awarded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What type of activities are likely to amount to a nuisance according to Christie v Davey [1893]?

A

Activities motivated by malice are likely to amount to a nuisance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the outcome in Hollywood Silver Fox Farm v Emmett [1936]?

A

Foxes miscarried following gunshot into the air.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does the case Allen v Gulf Oil [1981] illustrate about statutory authority?

A

Where Parliament authorises it, the nuisance continues.

17
Q

What statutory requirement is highlighted in Marcic v Thames Water [2004] HL?

A

A statutory requirement for ADR must be followed.

18
Q

What was the ruling in Miller v Jackson [1977] regarding cricket balls?

A

No injunction was granted to ensure tradition continued.

19
Q

What does a partial injunction do according to Kennaway v Thompson [1981]?

A

A partial injunction limits but doesn’t stop D’s activity.

20
Q

What does the case The Wagon Mound [1966] establish about foreseeability?

A

C’s losses must be reasonably foreseeable.

21
Q

What damages were caused by the oil refinery in Halsey v Esso [1961]?

A

Damages for loss of amenity represent the loss in value of the land.

22
Q

What was the main issue in Rylands v Fletcher [1868]?

A

D’s reservoir flooded C’s mine.

23
Q

What does an accumulation refer to in Giles v Walker [1890]?

A

An accumulation is a naturally occurring ‘gathering’.

24
Q

What happened in Hale v Jennings [1938]?

A

A fairground attraction chair flew off ride.

25
What was the outcome of Rickards v Lothian [1913] regarding liability?
D is not liable for the act of a stranger.
26
What does non-natural use mean in Transco v Stockport MBC [2003]?
Non-natural was defined as 'extraordinary and unusual'.
27
What was the impact of the chemical leak in Cambridge Water v East’ Counties Leather [1994]?
Chemical leak contaminated borehole.
28
What is required for a dangerous thing according to Read v Lyons [1946]?
The dangerous thing must leave land D controls.
29
What was the outcome in Stannard v Gore [2012]?
Fire escaped but dangerous thing (tyres) did not.
30
What does the case Cambridge Water v East’ Counties Leather [1994] indicate about damage?
Damage caused must be reasonably foreseeable.
31
What does Nichols v Marsland [1876] state about acts of God?
D is not liable for an act of God.
32
What does Green v Chelsea Waterworks [1894] state about statutory authority?
D is not liable when acting with statutory authority.