The Tort of Negligence Flashcards

(29 cards)

1
Q

What case established the incremental approach to Duty of Care (DOC)?

A

Robinson v Chief Cons of W Yorks [2018] SC

Old lady was pushed over during arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was established in Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] regarding Duty of Care?

A

Manufacturers owe a duty of care to their consumers

Decomposed snail found in bottle of ginger beer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Hill v Chief Cons of West Yorks [1998] establish about police duty of care?

A

Police owe a duty of care to the public, but not to prevent crime

Mother of Yorkshire Ripper’s last victim sued police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the significance of Robinson v Chief Cons of W Yorks [2018] SC in relation to police duty?

A

Established DOC: police to the public

Old lady was pushed over during arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Nettleship v Weston [1971] establish about the duty of care of drivers?

A

Drivers owe a duty of care to other road users

Learner driver crashed into lamppost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What principle was established in Bolam v Friern HMC [1957] regarding medical professionals?

A

Doctors owe a duty of care to their patients

Doctor chose not to give muscle relaxant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does Walker v Northumberland CC [1995] establish about employer responsibility?

A

Employers owe a duty of care to their employees

Social worker suffered a 2nd breakdown on return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was established in Kent v Griffiths [2000] regarding emergency services?

A

Emergency services owe a duty of care to those in need

Ambulance was inexplicably delayed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was the outcome of Capital & Counties v Hamp CC [1997]?

A

Fire officer ordered sprinklers to be switched off

Case discusses the duty of care in emergency situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990] HL establish about accountants?

A

Accountants owe a duty of care, but not to future shareholders

Company accounts contained an error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What concept did Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks [1856] explain?

A

Breach of Duty of Care

LJ Alderson explained breach of DOC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In Nettleship v Weston [1971], how was the learner driver judged?

A

Judged at objective standard

The law takes no account of lack of skill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What standard of care is raised in Bolam v Friern HMC [1957]?

A

Standard of care is raised for those with special skill

Doctor chose not to give muscle relaxant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What was the outcome of Mullin v Richards [1998] regarding children?

A

Children owe an age-appropriate standard of care

15 yr old girls got into a ruler fight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What did Roe v Minister of Health [1954] determine about foreseeability?

A

Defendant will be judged on what the reasonable man would foresee

C was paralysed by contamination in a test tube

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was significant about Bolton v Stone [1951] HL?

A

The greater the probability of harm, the more likely a breach has occurred

Cricket ball over fence was a rare occurrence

17
Q

What does Miller v Jackson [1977] illustrate about frequency of occurrences?

A

Cricket ball over fence was a frequent occurrence

Highlights the importance of frequency in assessing breach

18
Q

What standard is raised in Paris v Stepney BC [1951] HL regarding serious injury?

A

A risk of serious injury raises the standard of care

One-eyed employee was blinded

19
Q

In Latimer v AEC Ltd [1952] HL, what does a burden of removing risk imply?

A

A burden of removing the risk may mean no breach

C slipped on a flooded factory floor

20
Q

What was the significance of Watt v Hertfordshire CC [1954]?

A

The more important the defendant’s activity, the less likely the court will find him in breach

Heavy jack was not secure on fire engine

21
Q

What happened in Day v High Performance Sports [2003]?

A

Climber froze and fell from climbing wall

Case discusses liability in sports activities

22
Q

What was established in Tomlinson v Congleton BC [2004] HL regarding signs?

A

Ignored signs and entered lake in park

Highlights personal responsibility in dangerous situations

23
Q

What conclusion was drawn in McWilliams v Arrol Ltd [1962] HL about safety harnesses?

A

‘But for’ defendant’s breach of duty of care, claimant must not have been injured/died. There must be no novus actus interveniens

Worker was known not to want a safety harness

24
Q

What was the outcome of Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington HMC 1968 regarding arsenic poisoning?

A

C died at home from arsenic poisoning

Case discusses causation in negligence

25
What was the conclusion in Wilsher v Essex AHA [1988] HL regarding multiple causes?
Baby born blind with multiple causes ## Footnote Discusses the complexity of establishing causation
26
What test for remoteness was established in The Wagon Mound [1961] PC?
Established the test for remoteness ## Footnote Welding ignited nearby oil spill
27
What exceptions to the Wagon Mound remoteness test were identified in Hughes v Lord Advocate [1963] HL?
Exceptions to the Wagon Mound remoteness test ## Footnote Child was burned when he climbed down manhole
28
What did Bradford v Robinson Rentals [1967] establish regarding frostbite?
Employee suffered frostbite when delivering van ## Footnote Highlights the impact of duty of care in work environments
29
What triggered the return of ME in Page v Smith [1996]?
Minor RTA triggered return of ME ## Footnote Discusses psychological injury in negligence cases