Problem of evil Flashcards
david hume on the problem of evil
the problem of evil is the rock of atheism
evil
morally wrong acts
suffering
consequences of evil
moral evil
evil wrought by human actions
natural evil
evil wrought by the breakdown or malfunctioning of the natural world
jl mackie inconsistent triad
an omnibenevolent, omnipotent god cannot exist at the same time as evil however thiests believe in all 3
monism
evil does not exist, it is an illusion and what we feel are false feelings
dualism
there are two coexisting substances: good and evil
swinburne
god is like a parent that allows a child to grow up (allows us to make mistakes etc resulting in evil)
theodicy definition
‘in defence of a righteous god’
an attempt to justify the existence of god in the face of evil and suffering
the iranaen theodicy
soul making/soul deciding
soul making
genesis 1:26 ‘let us make man in our image and after our likeness’
the iranaen theodicy
god’s image/likeness
humans were created imperfect with the form (image) of god but not the content (likeness) of god
being in god’s image involved having intelligence, morality, and personality yet lacked completion
completion would be gained through development of courage, honour, generosity, kindness and love: becoming god’s likeness
human perfection has to be developed rather than ready made
the iranaen theodicy
free will
true goodness requires free will
man was created with true moral autonomy and had the freedom to make moral decisions
- free will has the potential for disobedience and evil, goodness has to be developed by free choice
-potential to grow into the likeness of god is found in responsible moral choices
the iranaen theodicy
epistemic distance
the natural world had to be designed with the possibility of causing harm and god had to stand back from creation and remain at an epistemic distance/distance of knowledge and therefore not obviously influence decisions
god cannot intervene and remove evil and suffering as this would compromise free will
the iranaen theodicy
hick
this world is a vale of soul making not a paradise
the iranaen theodicy
universalism
all people will eventually be saved and go to heaven
the iranaen theodicy
in the end
eventually evil and suffering will stop and everyone will develop into god’s likeness
everyone will eventually be rewarded in heaven, some immediately whilst others progress towards heaven in purgatory which refines them
the iranaen theodicy
criticisms
omnipotence
god has the power to create a perfect human/humans, ridding the need for evil and suffering
-however, this would mean perfection is ready made when the iranaen theodicy says god’s likeness needs to be earned and developed
the iranaen theodicy
criticisms
jesus
the argument is contrary to jesus’ teachings who was sent by god to reduce evil and suffering
jesus is supposed to be a likeness to god and therefore a perfection and shouldnt have suffered but he did
the iranaen theodicy
criticisms
born evil
people with mental illnesses commit evil but not out of choice
the iranaen theodicy
criticisms
heaven for all unjust
the concept of heaven for all contradicts religious texts which promise punishment for the unrighteous
heaven for all makes moral behaviour pointless and there is no incentive to do good
the iranaen theodicy
criticisms
quantity and gravity of suffering
the quantity and gravity of suffering in this world is unacceptable
why does our world need to contain the extent and severity found in events such as the holocaust
the iranaen theodicy
criticisms
love
suffering can never be an expression of god’s love
dz phillips: it is never justifiable to hurt someone in order to help them
augustinian theodicy
soul making/deciding?
soul deciding
decides where your soul ends up